5574
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Explain to me then what gender is.the problem with your comparison is that it only works if gender & sex were the same thing or were a unified object. but i disagree that they're unified, so it falls apart in my way of seeing things. if i agreed they were one in the same, i would agree with your point. but i disagree that gender = sex, so i disagree with your point
The point wasn't about AGP. Even the most hardcore HSTS is only as much of a woman as I am Napoleon.with that said, even if gender = sex, i don't think AGPs apply to that because they clearly don't truly believe they're women for the sake of having an identity. they tell themselves that to justify their perverted sexuality so that they have an excuse to be sex pests. however, when talking about non-AGPs & non-HSTSs, i think it would be a half napoleon rather than no napoleon since the gender identity lines up, which is half for half in the napoleon example
Explain to me then what gender is.
The point wasn't about AGP. Even the most hardcore HSTS is only as much of a woman as I am Napoleon.
But how is that different from how your precived identity interact with your physical body? Say for an example if some guys precived identity was Napoleon yet his body wasn't that of Napoleon.my definition of gender identity - `the way your personality/identity interacts with your biological sex`
biological sex - `genitalia, chromosomes, bone density, etc`
i think that gender identity exists because we human beings need a way to connect our personalities/identities to our bodies, so gender identity kind of serves as a bridge between them. gender identity disorders, therefore, are when the identity doesn't line up with your sex, which results in transgender people - AGP/HSTS on the other hand requires your gender identity to be male & sex to be male, since AGP/HSTS is a function of cis male sexuality
in my case, you would call me a cisgender male because i "feel" like a male, & my biological sex is "male". me "feeling like a male" is what my gender identity does, without a gender identity i wouldn't have any emotional or personality connection to my body.
in other words, your gender identity is a component of your when it comes to your biological sex. it's responsible for how you perceive yourself, & whether your body is the right fit for you or not. my gender identity is responsible for me having feelings like being really uncomfortable with people calling me female/referring to me femininely
But how is that different from how your precived identity interact with your physical body? Say for an example if some guys precived identity was Napoleon yet his body wasn't that of Napoleon.
His precived identity would be a component of his personality responsible for helping him understand & connect to his body, & whether his body is the right fit for him or not and all that. So why is he insane when a transwoman isn't?
Anyways, back on topic, anyone wanna deathpool on when the original herd hits 50% population death? I'm calling that it'll happen around August.
But let's just split up being Napoleon into two parts then. You have the physical part of (it i.e having the body of Napoleon), and the mental part of it (i.e believing that you are him). Also there's a spectrum to being Napoleon. His children were basically 50% Napoleon and their children were 25% Napoleon and so on, therefore there's people who are more Napoleon than others. I don't see how much more something can be a spectrum.>how is napoleon vs not napoleon different from gender/sex vs not gender/sex
because whether you are napoleon or not is a binary thing. whether you are male or female etc is a bit more like a gradient, because in my view you could identify as a male but have a vagina or you could identify as a female but have a penis. i think that would make transgenderism sort of be a gradient experience since i believe that gender & sex are connected things but not the same thing. i think our disagreement ultimately will come down to whether we agree/disagree that gender = sex
the napoleon argument only works if we both agree that gender & sex are exactly the same thing since the question is "are you a specific person or not" is a binary question. a napoleon is a unified whole of an object. if a napoleon were split up into two parts as i split up gender & sex, then your argument would make sense from my view
It is the same thing; a binary.>how is napoleon vs not napoleon different from gender/sex vs not gender/sex
with my system of seeing things, AGPs don't count as transgender because the gender part of their mind isn't "female", it's "male".
If you showed that video to someone who didn't know anything about the tranch they would assume everyone involved is male. That true and honest woman's voice is deeper than a lot of dudes I know, including myself.
"true and honest woman" is a jokey way of referring to TiMs who are especially obviously men.> That true and honest woman's voice is deeper than a lot of dudes I know, including myself.
Wait, I've missed something. Is there an actual female tran living there now?
That's... brave.
Transgenderism is ultimately human hubris. It is a giant "fuck you" to nature (or God if you prefer) by altering the very foundation of your identity. It is humans flouting the laws of nature (and potentially social mores) for their own gain.
Speaking of which.so do they realise that the desertification has occured? this is incredible to follow