Male, White, Young. Generally, anyone who claims they are logical is not. The All Lives Matter rhetoric means he is either a well-palced troll from the left or legitimately not indoctrinated. While he has visited the spot,. it was for unrelated reasons. I have both good and bad signs from him so he remains in the tossup category.
Female, Mixed, Young. All bad signs, I will assume "mixed" means "Half black" as it is the position least likely to be favorable to Chauvin. The "national input" angle is a bad one especially if there is reason to think she has a bias. Which we have in spades. Stays in the Pro-Guilty category and is likely the strongest detractor to Chauvin.
Male, White, Mid-Aged. Good signs all around for a Pro-Acquittal stance. Some pre bias, but is willing to set that aside allegedly. Notably works as an auditor, which means he stands to make money if things burn and a lot of properties go up for sale. Pro-Acquittal, but weakly.
Male, Black, Mid-Aged. Male is good, but their blackness is worth noting as being foreign. Additionally, he is well off, raised in a red state (And likely NOT Somalian since he moved to Minnesota). The addition of French as a language makes me think from one of the French colonies which tend to be VERY anti-ghetto black. Well-paying job area, nuclear family, is doing this out of civic duty. VERY pro-acquittal given the evidence provided to him.
Female, White, Older. Two good signs there, wealthier and works for a living. The lawyer sounds like she knows this will be fucked and is readying her own defense. She has a few red flags in her responses, but overall I am moving her from Pro-Guilty to Tossup.
Male, Black, Mid-Aged. STRONGLY Pro-Acquittal. Wealthy blacks hate Ghetto blacks AND he has expressed Pro-Chauvin views. Has some of the stock discrimination views, but his background is a big open goal for the defense.
Female, White, Older. Lives outside Minneapolis and thus less susceptible to fear. Mostly good statistics. Works in healthcare and likely to better understand how fucked FLoyd's health was. Good statements. Pro-Aquittal.
Male, Black, Mid-Aged. That burglary history is gooood for the defense. And it definitely sounds like he is a wealthier black. Means a good bias against Ghetto Blacks AND Goloyd's history will rub him wrong. Pro Police too. Moving him from Tossup to Pro-Aquittal.
Female, Mixed, Mid-Aged. Bad demographics all around. Good responses, but something about her history rubs me wrong. Tentative Tossup.
Female, White, Older. Nurse is good, likely to spot the issues. The judge can say all he wants about being an expert witness, but she will hold a LOT of sway with the other jurors. Being older makes her less likely to be an issue AND she is from out of Minneapolis proper. I had her as tossup, but moving her to Pro-Aquittal.
Female, Black, Older. Being a grandmother is worrying, The focus on being black as an identifier is worrying. Just all around worrying. Pro-Guilty.
Female, White, Mid-aged. Works in insurance, which means she has a financial stake in watching the city burn. Her answers though are worrying and so she remains in the Pro-Guilty camp.
So we have two tossups moving to Pro-Acquittal with one Pro-Guilty moving to Tossup. Honestly, this jury... isn't half bad. It's 6 - 3 -3 Acquittal - Tossup - Guilty.