The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[God of Nothing]

Sorry if this has already been posted

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1384617005785915403

View attachment 2104216
View attachment 2104218

You will never get daddy Trump to come back for epic clickbait's, literally who "reporter."

 

[SmugAutist]

Sorry if this has already been posted

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1384617005785915403

View attachment 2104216
View attachment 2104218

Yeah, no shit. It was pretty clear that Chauvin was being thrown under the bus by the rest of the police department as a sacrifice to appease the blackies. You're an imbecile if you didn't realize this.

 

[DiabeticSP]

How can it be murder AND manslaughter?

Like whatever fuck em maybe he desrved a murder rap but it cant be both murder and manslaughter.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

No, just perspective here. Both can claim self defense in that situation and probably be in the right. Good Samaritan actions can be very broadly defined.

No they can't. If someone does nothing wrong and you assault them then you assaulted an innocent person. No amount of thinking you're in the right gives you justification to do whatever you want you stupid faggot.

 

[Not Really Here]

Stand your ground says “ehhh”. Self defense can also be in the protection of others or property. It’s completely possible for both sides to be correct on self defense there.

They don't have SYG, they have basic Castle Doctrine.

 

[Aib Ld]

They said on CourtTV earlier that the Judge said he will be releasing the jurors' names eventually. Given that, absolutely no rational person would ever vote not guilty on anything. Voting not guilty is a vote to permanently fuck up your own life.

Is it legal to reveal the names of everyone that was in the trial? That sounds like a fucked up rule because of the risk of everyone getting fucked up by their own people. No wonder they voted the police officer guilty to save their own asses, I don't blame them. It's a lose-lose situation of both of them.

 

[AnOminous]

The DA of Minnesota just said that what happened today was not “Justice” because “justice involves restoration.” The conviction of Chauvin is “accountability” but only a small step toward justice.”

I hope our beloved kiwis of color are ready to rake in the reparations $$

Lmao the jury should have also resurrected Floyd and given him a bag of Fentanyl and a Cadillac.

 

[Pargon]

>mobs get a man wrongfully convicted for doing his job
>ITS FINE ITLL NEVER HAPPEN TO YOU STOP WORRYING
Yeah I'm sure that's what Chauvin though. I'm sure that's what Rittenhouse will be thinking when he gets convicted of murder.

But hey it could never happen to you right lol?

i can do my job without killing anyone

it's pretty easy, I've been managing it for over 20 years

 

[milkenjoyer]

Did Trump tweet already? Oh...

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

I gotta say, this was not the result I expected. It really took my breath away.

 

[BibiLivesMatter]

Alright ladies and gent this is how Q's plan is still going along accordingly and is showing now how Trump will create Amerikka 2.0

 

[AmazingEagle]

There will be "mostly peaceful" celebrations.

And "peaceful protests".

 

[COME ON OUT YOU RAPIST]

View attachment 2104193

take a break you're a bit mad

I've found that the internet is overly-forgiving toward those who would riot in response to a verdict yet overtly scornful toward those who would grumble. There are valid reasons to be angry or annoyed over the outcome of this case. Mass police resignation, officers taking full advantage of their lack of obligation to protect anyone (both of which I now presume to be likely) and a glowing precedence for jury intimidation does not benefit anyone other than criminals.

 

[Rekkington]

Sorry if this has already been posted

https://twitter.com/CurtisHouck/status/1384617005785915403

View attachment 2104216
View attachment 2104218

Oh boy Niggers are upset they don't get to be as mad as they were intending to be anyway?

 

[Techpriest]

Is it legal to reveal the names of everyone that was in the trial? That sounds like a fucked up rule because of the risk of everyone getting fucked up by their own people. No wonder they voted the police officer guilty to save their own asses, I don't blame them. It's a lose-lose situation of both of them.

Jury duty is public record. You are being held to account in front of a jury of your peers.

 

[AnOminous]

How can it be murder AND manslaughter?

Because they don't want to be physically ripped limb from limb by a mob of apes.

 

[LurkTrawl]

>mobs get a man wrongfully convicted for doing his job
>ITS FINE ITLL NEVER HAPPEN TO YOU STOP WORRYING
Yeah I'm sure that's what Chauvin though. I'm sure that's what Rittenhouse will be thinking when he gets convicted of murder.

But hey it could never happen to you right lol?

Some people just don't want to process what exactly this entails due to just how fucking awful it is, others are idiotic enough to be happy about the outcome. One thing's for sure though, regardless of how many people recognize the enormity of this verdict, this is a landmark precedent for the justice system in this country and if you don't pass the paper bag test, it's time to leave as soon as possible.

I'm thinking Alaska. Still in the U.S. but far away from all this clown shit.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

i can do my job without killing anyone

it's pretty easy, I've been managing it for over 20 years

Good thing you've never had to handle an nigger ODing then.

 

[Rekkington]

Don't worry guys, when Trump is back as President in August he's gonna fix all of this.

 

[Terminally Online]

How does sentencing work when all 3 are guilty for the same victim?

If the crimes are for the same or substantially similar act, the sentences will usually be served concurrently, meaning he'd only be in jail for until he served the length of the most severe charge.

The alternative would consecutive sentencing where the sentences stack, but it won't be consecutive; it will be concurrent.