Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[DocHoliday1977]

So forgive me if I don't believe you, Tony et al.

 

[Maw]

I should have pretended to like you and talked you into meeting me and then shot you in the head, Tony. Cause it sounds like that's the only thing that's going to stop you. Geriatric pervert.

Havent you claimed like 50x in this thread to have miscarried Tony’s child? Keep your stories straight. No wonder no one believes you. Not even your teachers, that’s why they failed you and you went crazy until you got kicked out of Colorado Technical University.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Havent you claimed like 50x in this thread to have miscarried Tony’s child? Keep your stories straight. No wonder no one believes you. Not even your teachers, that’s why they failed you and you went crazy until you got kicked out of Colorado Technical University.

Donald, didn't you post your penis to Twitter in a jealous frenzy?

Havent you claimed like 50x in this thread to have miscarried Tony’s child? Keep your stories straight. No wonder no one believes you. Not even your teachers, that’s why they failed you and you went crazy until you got kicked out of Colorado Technical University.

And why you didn't get re-elected? Is it because you are a lunatic who abuses presidential power?

Havent you claimed like 50x in this thread to have miscarried Tony’s child? Keep your stories straight. No wonder no one believes you. Not even your teachers, that’s why they failed you and you went crazy until you got kicked out of Colorado Technical University.

No, I haven't. I've never been around anywhere near Tony Robbins.

The Kimberly Guilfoyle Sexual Harassment Allegations Get Even Darker

Including, according to a new report, making her Fox News assistant massage her bare thighs.

www.vanityfair.com

"The draft complaint also alleged that Guilfoyle spoke incessantly and luridly about her sex life, and on one occasion demanded a massage of her bare thighs; other times, she said, Guilfoyle told her to submit to a Fox employee’s demands for sexual favors, encouraged her to sleep with wealthy and powerful men, asked her to critique her naked body, demanded that she share a room with her on business trips, required her to sleep over at her apartment, and exposed herself to her, making her feel deeply uncomfortable."

Geez, #supertypoonkimberlyguilfoyle

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Donald Trump Jr. if you verbally attack me again in any way, shape, or form or contact me in any way shape or form, I am going to file a restraining order on you, your father, and your "girlfriend", do I make myself clear?

So, essentially, you want a gag order? You know those are unconstitutional (Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) ), right? That being said, permanant injunctions are rarely granted (Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982) ).

Spoiler: Citations

"Any [gag order] comes to this Court with a 'heavy presumption' against its constitutional validity"
"An injunction should issue only where the intervention of a court of equity "is essential in order effectually to protect property rights against injuries otherwise irremediable." "
"The Court has repeatedly held that the basis for injunctive relief in the federal courts has always been irreparable injury and the inadequacy of legal remedies. "

Hint, your situation is not one where you would get such an injuctions. Same goes for the gag order.

the evidence is on this thread that people read

There is no evidence here that would grant you any injuction or a gag order.

When I tell you to go away, I expect people who weren't raised in a barn to fuck

There is nothing forcing us to go away.

I will take up a fight to ensure you do learn this simple behavior attitude. And I will win

You will lose.

Bradley Cooper
View attachment 2107702
View attachment 2107703

Text shows you doubting that the sender is Bradley, but now you claim it's bradley?

Evidence proves you wrong

Literally does not. Nothing you posted is any evidence that proves anything other than that you fell for some catfish scams and trolls. That's ignoring that most of it would be inadmissable in court.

This account messaged me for a few weeks. I never sent any personal information.


That was in 2013. In 2014

"These two unconnected events a year apart are actually connected, trust me"

View attachment 2107934
View attachment 2107940
View attachment 2107942
View attachment 2107944
View attachment 2107940

2015 fake nude pics of me sent out from a fake facebook account. Posted above.
2016
View attachment 2107946
2017
This guy messages me sending his face pic
View attachment 2107961
View attachment 2107960View attachment 2107950
2018
The Bradley texts
This from you sacks of shit:

2019
View attachment 2107973
View attachment 2107977

So I think it's all of you. I think you all get involved because you are a large group of deviants with no souls.

I don't respect any of you. At all. @LoverofPi

All this proves is that you fell for some obvious scams and trolls.

You and your stupid multiple accounts

Why do you think we have multiple accounts?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Why do you think we have multiple accounts?

So you are admitting you are the scam and trolls? From Tony?

So, essentially, you want a gag order? You know those are unconstitutional (Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) ), right? That being said, permanant injunctions are rarely granted (Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982) ) "An injunction should issue only where the intervention of a court of equity "is essential in order effectually to protect property rights against injuries otherwise irremediable." " " The Court has repeatedly held that the basis for injunctive relief in the federal courts has always been irreparable injury and the inadequacy of legal remedies. ".
Hint, your situation is not one where you would get such an injuctions. Same goes for the gag order.

I'm pretty sure I said restraining order, youtube lawyer.

You will lose.

TL;DR Probably not, youtube lawyer.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

So you are admitting you are the scam and trolls?

1. That's not the part of my post you quoted.
2. No.

From Tony?

Also, no. I have never met or talked to Tony.

I'm pretty sure I said restraining order, youtube lawyer.

Restraining order against speech is a gag order. Nevertheless, restraining order is still an injuction, and therefore my citations about them still very much apply.
Also, I'm Nick now? Nice.

TL;DR Probably not, youtube lawyer

I showed why you'd lose. If you are so certain of your victory, show citations that would show your victory. Spoiler, you can't. Also, if you think I am a lawyer, then why do you (a non-lawyer) think you know better than me?
Also, no, I am not Nick.

Edit: Nick is currently live, so I can't be nick:

 

[DocHoliday1977]

1. That's not the part of my post you quoted.
2. No.

Also, no. I have never met or talked to Tony.

Restraining order against speech is a gag order. Nevertheless, restraining order is still an injuction, and therefore my citations about them still very much apply.
Also, I'm Nick now? Nice.

I showed why you'd lose. If you are so certain of your victory, show citations that would show your victory. Spoiler, you can't. Also, if you think I am a lawyer, then why do you (a non-lawyer) think you know better than me?
Also, no, I am not Nick.

Edit: Nick is currently live, so I can't be nick:

Of course, Tony.

1. That's not the part of my post you quoted.
2. No.

Also, no. I have never met or talked to Tony.

Restraining order against speech is a gag order. Nevertheless, restraining order is still an injuction, and therefore my citations about them still very much apply.
Also, I'm Nick now? Nice.

I showed why you'd lose. If you are so certain of your victory, show citations that would show your victory. Spoiler, you can't. Also, if you think I am a lawyer, then why do you (a non-lawyer) think you know better than me?
Also, no, I am not Nick.

Edit: Nick is currently live, so I can't be nick:

Hitch your wagon to their star...Tony Robbins and Donald Trumps. I've got plans for them both and why don't you tag along?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Of course, Tony.

But you said I was Nick, though.

Hitch your wagon to their star...Tony Robbins and Donald Trumps

Incoherent.

I've got plans for them both and why don't you tag along?

Like always, your plans will fail. When is your suit?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

But you said I was Nick, though.

Incoherent.

Like always, your plans will fail. When is your suit?

When I submit it. Richard.

@Useful_Mistake A restraining order is an order not to specifically contact a person due to harassment and abusive behavior. A gag order is an order where people do not discuss a suit out side of court under the direction of a judge.
Are coming to America to slander me for whatever reason, Richard?


My bad, are *you* coming....

 

[Useful_Mistake]

When I submit it. Richard.

You said I was Tony, though. Am I Richard, Tony, or Nick?
Why does it take you so long to submit it? Just do it already, it's not like waiting will make it any better.

@Useful_Mistake A restraining order is an order not to specifically contact a person due to harassment and abusive behavior.

Restraining order is many things. Like a Gag order, or any similar orders, it is almost always unconstitutional (Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965)) and because it is an injunction, it has extremely high requirments to be granted (Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982)). I assure you, you do not meet those requirments.

A gag order is an order where people do not discuss a suit out side of court under the direction of a judge.

Sometimes, yes. It is used in other ways too. FBI letters, for example, come pre-attached with Gag orders even when not concerning matters of lawsuits. An IG report also confirmed this. FBI investigations come with Gag orders too, here's more. Non involved children banned talking about fracking in general forever. Here's more, more, etc. I won't go into the entirety of Gag order history, but without a doubt you are incorrect in your assumption.

Are coming to America to slander me for whatever reason, Richard?

Whose to say I don't already live in US? That being said, why would I need to be in US to slander you? I'm not slandering you, but still.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

@Useful_Mistake...oh for fucks sake.

You said I was Tony, though. Am I Richard, Tony, or Nick?
Why does it take you so long to submit it? Just do it already, it's not like waiting will make it any better.

Restraining order is many things. Like a Gag order, or any similar orders, it is almost always unconstitutional (Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965)) and because it is an injunction, it has extremely high requirments to be granted (Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982)). I assure you, you do not meet those requirments.

Sometimes, yes. It is used in other ways too. FBI letters, for example, come pre-attached with Gag orders even when not concerning matters of lawsuits. An IG report also confirmed this. FBI investigations come with Gag orders too, here's more. Non involved children banned talking about fracking in general forever. Here's more, more, etc. I won't go into the entirety of Gag order history, but without a doubt you are incorrect in your assumption.

Whose to say I don't already live in US? That being said, why would I need to be in US to slander you? I'm not slandering you, but still.

*Yawn

 

[Useful_Mistake]

@Useful_Mistake...oh for fucks sake.

*Yawn

Why can't you just admit your mistake like a normal person?

 

[Synthwave Obsessed]

I like your new profile picture @DocHoliday1977

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I like your new profile picture @DocHoliday1977

It fits her.

Edit: She changed it from a cow to a text message. Lame.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

It fits her

You will lose.

No. You didn't even know the difference between a restraining order and a gag order.
I disrespect you completely as a competent intellectual.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You didn't even know the difference between a restraining order and a gag order.

Disprove even a single thing I said about your case (for example this, or this) or my comment on Gag orders. You can't, because I cited every single thing I claimed. Unlike you, I can backup my assertions. In the words of Alex Jones, Pam, "you're not an intellectual, you're a fake and a fraud".

I disrespect you completely as a competent intellectual.

That's okay, I don't respect you in any way either.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Disprove even a single thing I said about your case (for example this, or this) or my comment on Gag orders. You can't, because I cited every single thing I claimed. Unlike you, I can backup my assertions. In the words of Alex Jones, Pam, "you're not an intellectual, you're a fake and a fraud".

That's okay, I don't respect you in any way either.

Thanks for using Alex Jones as a point of reference for intelligence. And you can click those links.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Thanks for using Alex Jones as a point of reference for intelligence.

You are literally a moron. Read what I wrote again. I cited his words, not used him as a point of reference in terms of intelligence, Learn to read.

And you can click those links.

"Mean links bad! Because see links, argument no valid!"
If links prevent you from countering my argument, it's you that is at fault, not my argument.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You are literally a moron. Read what I wrote again. I cited his words, not used him as a point of reference in terms of intelligence, Learn to read.

"Mean links bad! Because see links, argument no valid!"
If links prevent you from countering my argument, it's you that is at fault, not my argument.

You sound out of control today.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You sound out of control today.

Still waiting for you to prove me wrong. Because if you go to court, you should expect similar arguments to mine to be used against you. Since you can't counter them, you will fail.