An old post but it bears repeating. I remember when kinksters had a phrase "YKINOK," standing for "your kink is not ok" that they vilified as a backwards attitude. As long as something involves consenting adults it's fine, they said.
It's becoming clear that having a humiliation-related kink reflects something deeply wrong within a person. They get off on having no boundaries and this usually seems to translate to having no respect for other people's boundaries either. I've heard from girls who are into the Lolita fashion scene that men with sissy fetishes will use their pictures to create caption porn and also show up at their events to leer. Any man who's into this can be counted on to not care about the feelings of people who he uses as "models" of his sissy self, it happens every single time they interact with one of these guys.
It goes without saying that the trans community is rife with this, their vision of womanhood is one of degradation and they want to play out this degradation in every arena possible. It's a kink that naturally pushes a person toward non-consensual behavior, because true degradation requires an unwilling target; once you've acquiesced to being degraded in some way you can't say that it's really degrading. For a person like this to get a sexual thrill requires that they keep pushing boundaries, because once a behavior is accepted the thrill goes away.
For Stefonknee, the first time he dressed as a little girl it got his rocks off like nothing ever before. But then it became routine and it wasn't enough. He had to parade around in public in his 6-year-old getup, play with his dom's actual grandchildren and then move to worse things. Troons have to fill the matches on Her, walk around diapered in public and "wrestle" with kids at Drag Queen Story Hour, otherwise there's no point to what they're doing.
Here's the thing--everything you're talking about?
These are people who are making people who are
not consenting and/or adults get involved in their fetishes. The whole 'consenting adults' thing means you're respecting others' boundaries...and they don't believe other people get to
have boundaries. (The It's Ma'am rampage? That's expecting somebody you just dragged into your scene to know your boundaries and respect them--except, well, you didn't ask them if they wanted to be involved
or make sure everybody in the scene knew the soft and hard limits.)
Some of this may be because the kinkster community's had a
serious influx of people whose ideas of how shit like consent works and how kink works comes from things like
50 Shades of Grey which are basically the kinkster equivalent of those mysterious pornographic scrawls on the bathroom walls that appear to have been done by somebody who
somehow has managed to never have never seen a penis
or a vagina. (With the same disturbing implications. The '24/7/365 lifestyle' thing is supposed to
stay in the definitely-a-fantasy porn, for example.)
But the mainstream bizarro version has pretty much ignored a
huge amount of what's involved in getting consent--and a huge number of the people espousing this disturbingly rapey shit are the same people who will REEEEE about rape culture and all.
End of the day?
It's sex pests all the way down, here.
This is also why I
don't find it believable when they claim they have gender dysphoria--and troons are more likely to instead just insist you're transphobic truscum for saying that you aren't trans without it, anyway. What they're
actually got is a runaway humiliation fetish/AGP disaster. With lots of rapey goodness because of
course they've got to have
that in there.