Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    3,844
Late reply but what the hell even qualifies as an incel?

Edit: Like is it just being a virgin at a certain age? Is it being a virgin and wishing you weren't? Or do you have to OURIGHT identify with the movement to be considered one?
 
Last edited:
Late reply but what the hell even qualifies as an incel?

Edit: Like is it just being a virgin at a certain age? Is it being a virgin and wishing you weren't? Or do you have to OURIGHT identify with the movement to be considered one?
If you want sex and cannot get it without paying for a prostitute you're an incel, this doesn't mean you have to be a virgin to be an incel. You have to be able to get sex consistently and on demand to not be considered one.
 
If you want sex and cannot get it without paying for a prostitute you're an incel, this doesn't mean you have to be a virgin to be an incel. You have to be able to get sex consistently and on demand to not be considered one.
I don't understand what that means "get sex consistently and on demand."

What if you want sex but simply lack the energy and motivation to ask people out? Does that count as an incel too? I personally don't think so. The logic you show me just seems flawed and wrong.
 
Late reply but what the hell even qualifies as an incel?

Edit: Like is it just being a virgin at a certain age? Is it being a virgin and wishing you weren't? Or do you have to OURIGHT identify with the movement to be considered one?
Basically being a virgin, or deprived of sex long enough without reciprocity, and wishing you weren't.
Different than volcels, who are either waiting for marriage or have sworn off sex entirely.

"Identifying" with the movement has nothing to do with it, as many "anti-incels" are either obsessive "male feminist" redditors and/or fedora'd "nice guys" who RESPEKT WHAMEN, both of which fall into the incel category more often than not.

Some people can't be in it because of immutable factors such as their race, height or facial bone structure. You cannot lift and shower your way out of inceldom if you're a 5'2 or if you're indian ect..
Well that's because shorties don't deserve to pass their shitty, short genes on so
 
I don't understand what that means "get sex consistently and on demand."

What if you want sex but simply lack the energy and motivation to ask people out? Does that count as an incel too? I personally don't think so. The logic you show me just seems flawed and wrong.
The word literally just means involuntarily celibate which means you want sex but can't get it. You sound like you're coping though if you really want it though.
 
Some people can't be in it because of immutable factors such as their race, height or facial bone structure. You cannot lift and shower your way out of inceldom if you're a 5'2 or if you're indian ect..
You can, but you're not willing to put in the work.
Very, very few things are insurmountable. Physical traits matter less than the incel circlejerks want you to believe. Yes, you can get laid at 5'2. You can get laid if you're indian, you can get laid if your face is shite. You can even have meaningful and fullfilling relationships.
But here's the problem: You are not willing to adjust your standards. If we keep the silly attractiveness numbers, the problem is that incels that are way below average refuse to even consider women below like a 7. Now women are much more likely to actually date less attrative men, BUT those less attractive men usually have an advantage over equally unattractive incels: They have a personality that is not the equivalent of Chernobyl's reactor 4.
It's not how you look. It's who you are.
 
Back