Culture Over 50% Of Liberal, White Women Under 30 Have A Mental Health Issue. Are We Worried Yet? - Women posting Ls


1619179690170.png


A 2020 Pew Research study reveals that over half of white, liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental health condition at some point. Does this mean there's a correlation between progressive ideas and mental health?


It’s a common tactic of the politically charged on either side (and normally perceived as a cheap one at that) to take the particular adherents of an ideology and equate that diehard worship to mental illness.

Conservatives label younger liberal generations as snowflakes or as having Trump derangement syndrome if they didn't like the past president; liberals and progressives label right-leaning individuals or conservatives as racists, bigots, misogynists, etc. Resorting to this type of lowbrow behavior might once have been seen as an excuse not to address the actual issues or beliefs at hand, but now ad hominem attacks are more common than not.

But what if what was once a cheap shot or a personal insult has actually been found to bear scientific correlation between the individuals who hold progressive ideologies and an increased risk of mental illness? That’s exactly what Pew Research has found — and all politics aside, the shocking diagnosis of over 50% of liberal women with some form of mental health medical diagnosis is a public health concern that no one seems to be discussing, let alone taking seriously.

Women and Mental Illness


For whatever reason, we’re not talking about the risk of mental illness women in general face, especially compared to men.

Women are 40% more likely to develop depression than men. Due to lower levels of serotonin, we’re also more likely to have anxiety and depression because of that deficiency. There are also certain life experiences, like childbirth for example, which can lead to these diagnoses. 1 in 7 women will be diagnosed with postpartum depression in the year following childbirth. Postpartum depression in particular is a condition that leaves its victims feeling powerless and without confidence or assurance in their own abilities as a mom or caregiver — many women with postpartum depression describe feeling like failures.

Women are 40% more likely to develop depression than men.

Conditions like depression and anxiety thrive in silence, but there also seems to be a lack of confidence in women when it comes to knowing our own bodies, and instead our mental problems are written off as being too overly “emotional.” (Think about how many times someone has described you or another woman as emotional.) While hormones do obviously play a role in the development of mental health, for better or for worse, it’s possible to minimize or downplay the risks our mental health is facing if they’re written off as a “hormonal” issue, whether it’s our medical professionals or even ourselves engaging in that mindset.

But biology and hormones aside, what about the choices we actively engage in? The behaviors we indulge, the beliefs and convictions we hold as more important than all the others? The people we spend our time with, the actions we devote our energy to, and the news we consume? Is that negatively impacting our mental health, or even more importantly, leading to medical diagnoses?

Here’s What the Study Found


The study in question — which, by the way, isn’t from a news source or media outlet but Pew Research for heaven’s sake — is, when all’s said and done, pretty damning.

Interestingly enough, the study, which is titled Pew American Trends Panel: Wave 64, was dated March 2020 — over a year ago. Yet it took a Ph.D. candidate in political science posting about the study on Twitter for it to garner even a smidge of attention.

The study, which examined white liberals, moderates, and conservatives, both male and female, found that conservatives were far less likely to be diagnosed with mental health issues than those who identified as either liberal or even “very liberal.” What’s more, white women suffered the worst of all. White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives.

1619179850788.png


Zach Goldberg, the doctoral candidate in question, consolidated the study’s info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter. But it’s important to note that he clarified the following: “I didn't write this thread to mock white liberals or their apparently disproportionate rates of mental illness (and you shouldn't either). Rather, this is a question that's underexplored and which may shed light on attitudinal differences towards various social policies." He’s right.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified psychiatrist who’s treated mental disorders for over 30 years, agrees and adds that white liberalism thrives on supposedly championing “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed,” who they continuously see as “wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited, and victimized” with little to no agency of their own (A view that often mutates into the infantilizing and patronizing of certain groups within a narrative).

When those raised to think reality is subjective bump up against objective reality, there can be mental health consequences.

The people responsible for these crimes? As Rossiter tells it: “poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization, and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: ‘Big Business,’ ‘Big Corporations,’ ‘greedy capitalists,’ ‘U.S. Imperialists,’ ‘the oppressors,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the powerful,’ and ‘the selfish’.”

That’s pretty much an exhaustive list of every grievance and every perpetrator that progressives see as responsible for these injustices which plague our disenfranchised communities while moderates and conservatives seemingly sit idly by unconcerned with anything but their own privilege.

But as the study exemplifies, the champions of these causes (white women in particular) aren’t exactly living the liberated utopia they believe we all should be living.

Taking It Seriously


It’s truly unfortunate that so many women are facing these kinds of issues, and that this prevalence of mental illness among progressive women might be being weaponized for political purposes. If there’s one thing this topic deserves, it’s delicacy and empathy. We should feel compassion for these women, especially if we’ve struggled with mental health ourselves.

But at the heart of the matter is this: Progressivism is an ideology that supposedly demands equality for all, and one that keeps score to an exhausting degree. The privilege between social classes, between races, between men and women, between religious and non-religious, and more, all have to be constantly monitored, and “inequality” has to be exposed for the purposes of “accountability.” That kind of behavior isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsustainable. In all honesty, it’s understandable that anxiety and depression thrive in these kinds of environments when we’re focusing on every minute, problematic issue in our world and not able to take comprehensive, productive action to solve all these problems.

Progressivism demands equality for all and keeps score to an exhausting, unsustainable degree.

There's also the unrelenting focus on oppression, verbal violence, and micro-aggressions. We know that building resiliency against hardship is the best weapon against depression and anxiety, yet progressive ideology forces its followers to wallow in feelings of helplessness and victimhood. Instead of empowering women and minorities with self-knowledge, strength of character, and resilience to hardship, progressivism encourages victims to stay in a place of fear and helplessness.


Closing Thoughts


It’s not just significant that the women suffering from mental health issues are white (though we’ll get to that) but especially that they’re so young. The age range of those most affected was 18-29. These women are students, employees, moms, daughters, wives, and friends. They have goals and ambitions, yet who knows how hampered their day-to-day lives are by the conditions they’ve been diagnosed with.

But it’s also key that white individuals are usually at the forefront of these movements, whether or not they're the group being adversely affected. As most of us know by now, white guilt and savior narratives are pretty much as bad as any genuinely racist agenda because it robs the very group they’re trying to help of their own voice.

We should be having the difficult conversations this topic requires. But if you take a quick look at the state of our political discourse nowadays, we might not be ready for it.



So not only TDS is true, female libtards are certified lunatics compared to their conservative counterparts.

Really makes you think.
 
Okay, but how much of this increase is comprised of ((women))

I also want to add to the career vs motherhood debate- many households don't have that choice anymore. A breadwinner/homemaker setup is impossible for the working class and is growing increasingly impossible for the vanishing middle. The only way for women to be stay at home moms is landing rich providers (unlikely) or being single welfare queens (frowned upon, and rightly so).

Either women have to start vacating the workforce en masse, raising the value of men's labor and reducing competition, or start flocking to work-from-home positions and try to juggle homemaking and work from an easier position. Women have been doing the latter due to COVID, with mixed results.

I personally would love to be a SAHM, but unless I suddenly happen upon a fuckload of money that ain't happening anytime soon. Kids are fucking expensive.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the difference is there.
I think it's just that liberal people go to a therapist more often so they get diagnosed more often as well.

Yes, but then yuo'd have to ask why liberals go more to a therapist.

Women who aren't liberal often have no time to think about how sad they are feeling.
 
I think a large part of it is due to them always being on contraceptives but don't quote me on that.
This is common enough elsewhere in the world and the white women in those countries are not totally pilled out.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: LurkNoMore
Probably because they're more likely to get actual treatment for mental illnesses instead of denying they have problems or blaming it on demons or satan or whatever (which is what led to cows like fitveganginger having her blatantly obviously eating disorder go untreated to the point of her evolving into a munchie because lying about having cystic fibrosis is less shameful to fundies than admitting to having a mental illness like an eating disorder).

Also it's been known for years than men aren't less likely to develop mental illnesses, they're just way less likely to seek treatment and diagnosis because they face so much stigma for doing so.

Btw tumblrina snowflake types generally don't have half the shit they claim to, bored upper middle class suburban girls like pretending to have mental illnesses they don't actually have as an edgy fashion statement. If you take the claims of girls who claim vaporwave is a gender and pokemon fanart is racist at face value, you're almost as retarded as they are.
 
Last edited:
Glad there is now data to support my decades-long perspective that liberalism is a mental illness and a blight upon the human condition.

Now to work on quarantining the afflicted. Preferably somewhere off planet.
 
Mental illness has been regularly associated with neuroticism, and neuroticism has been regularly linked with progressive/tankie ideas over many years and in many countries. Medicine has just been very polite about drawing this link in terms the general public would understand or screech about. There are more examples than just those granular study, by the way, this gets studied rather a lot, because identifying predispositions/risk factors for schizophrenia, BPD, etc. is a high priority for mental health.
Aside: I would probably blame the relatively fewer neurotic conservatives/"right-wingers" that exist for the batshit conspiracy side of the aisle, but that's my gut feeling. Unlike general political leanings & personality types, specific beliefs are much too muddy to break down with any reliability. Neurotic progs could be progressives because the great turtle in the sky told them to and no one would know the difference, math does not read minds, but the trend can be observed without knowing why.


Instead, people who are prone to anxiety and depression tend to gather around those sorts of narratives. The fact that they're anxious and depressed at the moment is multifaceted, but often comes down to just personality types integrated over time.
Do you have any more links to studies linking liberalism/leftism with neuroticism? I’ve noticed this trend but I would love to have peer reviewed studies to throw at them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: talk sh1t
I also want to add to the career vs motherhood debate- many households don't have that choice anymore. A breadwinner/homemaker setup is impossible for the working class and is growing increasingly impossible for the vanishing middle.
I really wonder, now that you mention it. Is it that it's largely impossible now, or is it the product of families trying to live beyond their means?

When I ponder marriage and when I see other men do the same, despite what you mention and despite the plausibility of your thesis, we're largely unconcerned with the woman's earning potential, which wouldn't make sense in a society where both husband and wife have to work to make ends meet. We may be interested in the job a woman has in terms of status, or even what the presumed work it took to get to that position says about her character in the context of the rest of her known character, but we're not really thinking or talking about the combined power of our incomes and what that enables when we're looking at marriage partners not least of all because "what's hers is hers and what's his is also hers". And we're certainly not inclined to ask our wives to pick up a job to ease any financial strife-- it just happens that a lot of women now are career women by the time courting starts.

Probably because they're more likely to get actual treatment for mental illnesses instead of denying they have problems or blaming it on demons or satan or whatever (which is what led to cows like fitveganginger having her blatantly obviously eating disorder go untreated to the point of her evolving into a munchie because lying about having cystic fibrosis is less shameful to fundies than admitting to having a mental illness like an eating disorder).
Then you can pull up the parallel (in regards to mental disorder) or analogous (in regards to claims of demonic troubling, so we at least have the starting grounds to assume that we're talking about the same thing manifested in different subcultures) survey results.

Putting aside that not every conservative is a fundamentalist (the religious right-- even assuming it to be all fundies-- was apparently always a minority, however catered-to, in right-wing politics), I can easily say that anything that can't be gleaned by simple observation (e.g. single motherhood) is happening to whatever extent in whatever community but they just. Don't. Respond adequately. Either they're not responding to surveys properly, or they're not allowing diagnoses to be given, or whatever.

At that point the question of whether they have similar rates, or similar rates but manifested as an unaccounted arguable analogue, remains unanswered by anything except preexistent biases against fundamentalists.
 
I really wonder, now that you mention it. Is it that it's largely impossible now, or is it the product of families trying to live beyond their means?

When I ponder marriage and when I see other men do the same, despite what you mention and despite the plausibility of your thesis, we're largely unconcerned with the woman's earning potential, which wouldn't make sense in a society where both husband and wife have to work to make ends meet. We may be interested in the job a woman has in terms of status, or even what the presumed work it took to get to that position says about her character in the context of the rest of her known character, but we're not really thinking or talking about the combined power of our incomes and what that enables when we're looking at marriage partners not least of all because "what's hers is hers and what's his is also hers". And we're certainly not inclined to ask our wives to pick up a job to ease any financial strife-- it just happens that a lot of women now are career women by the time courting starts.


Then you can pull up the parallel (in regards to mental disorder) or analogous (in regards to claims of demonic troubling, so we at least have the starting grounds to assume that we're talking about the same thing manifested in different subcultures) survey results.

Putting aside that not every conservative is a fundamentalist (the religious right-- even assuming it to be all fundies-- was apparently always a minority, however catered-to, in right-wing politics), I can easily say that anything that can't be gleaned by simple observation (e.g. single motherhood) is happening to whatever extent in whatever community but they just. Don't. Respond adequately. Either they're not responding to surveys properly, or they're not allowing diagnoses to be given, or whatever.

At that point the question of whether they have similar rates, or similar rates but manifested as an unaccounted arguable analogue, remains unanswered by anything except preexistent biases against fundamentalists.
There’s no point in arguing with a retarded, murderous, clump of cells. It just makes you stupider for having wasted your time.
 
There’s no point in arguing with a retarded, murderous, clump of cells. It just makes you stupider for having wasted your time.
Yeah, I wouldn't normally respond to a barely above-water misanthrope that's seemingly not(!) the product of Scott Pilgrim vs. the World about what qualifies as human life or who deserves human dignity. Aside from much anything else being a crapshoot, I wanted to respond to the idea overall and not just her specifically.
 
This is major cope because the study also included a mental health questionnaire (also controlled for a mh diagnosis) & personality profiles. They all look bad for the libs.
Is it bad for libs or are they just more likely to be honest.

Also I was a doctor certified crazy person and put on pills long before I knew what a liberal or conservative was. All I knew about politics was that it was boring adult shit because I was like 7.
Godlessness often leads to mental illness.
If only this weren't A&H and I knew this post was sarcastic.

Forreal fundies are just as completely batshit as their secular counterparts, they're just way less likely to admit it or seek help for it. Even to this day pretty much every fundie mommy blogger has pretty blatent NPD, and most have at least slight munchie tendencies. More god tends to correlate with higher levels of violent insanity, not less.

I feel like tradlarpers on Thunderdome and elsewhere are mostly kids with liberal parents from blue areas trying to spite them who have little prolonged exposure to fundies and other fringe right wing creatures. Having grown up around them I don't think I knew a single fundie family that wasn't massively unhealthy and dysfunctional and whose kids didn't have serious issues. They're just way less likely to actually own up to their problems.
 
Last edited:
Do you have any more links to studies linking liberalism/leftism with neuroticism? I’ve noticed this trend but I would love to have peer reviewed studies to throw at them.
There aren't that many high profile meta-analysis on this subject since it draws undue attention, most of my personal exposure is through bumping into individual studies in the wild, but this lad did a good job (warning: downloads PDF, not dolphin porn I promise) collecting some of the data to share so I don't have to. I can't speak to some of his personal conjectures/analysis, but it bumps roughly with what I know. Figure 3a and 3b are the ones most related to the question I was asked and some of the most stark figures he generates.
Edit: Oh, and a lot of these studies are targeted at millennials these days, so the average rate of crazy has gone up over time, it's just some groups are more crazy than others on average. Social media is a plague.
 
Last edited:
Back