- Joined
- Mar 27, 2019
Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
Commitment to the simps. When you market yourself to a thirsty audience, you can't afford dry spells.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Well, here's the thing. June already has an instagram. It's just that no one in this thread checks her updates there. (I don't have an Instagram account). So if someone wanted to look at her instagram and how regularly she updates it, we would get an idea of how committed she is to her simps.
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
At least June shaving her simphole means that the carpet matches the drapes.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Oh god. I hope she shaves it! Why did you have to give me that mental image?
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
china right now is unironically closer to nazism / national socialism than it is to any other ideology
>totalitarian state control of public and private life
>complete domination of politics by the singular ruling party
>state-capitalist economy that combines public ownership and private enterprise
>strong nationalism and patriotism used to unify and rally the people
>harsh treatment of hostile minorities (uighurs)
>increasingly aggressive and confrontational foreign policy
>ambition to dethrone the ruling global powers
it's all there. Xi does not have as much unquestioned personal authority as hitler did, and he doesn't have a hitler tier cult of personality around himself either, but other than that it's a pretty similar situation overall
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2013
She pulls her hair out, so she either shaves it to prevent herself from doing it or she's just yanking it out. Either way she's the reason she's bald up top as much as she's the reason she's hairless down below.
Meriasek
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 16, 2020
Ok yeah, that we don't know. But if she wears a wig constantly and compulsively rips out her hair it'd make sense if she'd shave her head, too.
...
So she probably doesn't.
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
Damn China sounds based. If only it wasn't full of Chinese people.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
I was trying not to be explicit here but I guess I'm not explaining myself very well. I'm saying that I hope her trichotillomania only applies to the hair on her head and not that she's ripping her pubes out too.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
Numerous companies get into trouble for selling personal information, "doxxxing" is pretty much illegal there unless it's "well intentioned". There's also various shitty hate speech laws that pretty much only prosecute Hans that don't like them minorities and so called "cyber harassment" policies. Basically in China, anyone but the state evading a citizen's privacy can be criminalised. Here, both are allowed. Google is allowed to fuck around with personal information, and the FBI is allowed to bug people's vehicles as long as it's done on public property (a parking lot for example).
In China, the infrastructure, transport and ISPs, cellular companies, oil and mining etc are state owned. The "private enterprise" plays by state rules, they have to abide by environmental regulations and other protectionist measures. Borderline socialist.
The rest are completely lopsided Western projection, which all began with Trump. I made an autistic post about the so called "Uygurs" in the Voosh thread. Basically, I hate those camps but minorities enjoy far more benefits than the supermajority, more than being Black in America. That's the exact opposite of national socialism. There's enough Hans to breed all of them out, yet these commies have autistic rules on interracial marriage. There's said to be up to 1 million in those camps, of course asserted without any evidence. I personally think it's way lower (maybe 150k), but even 1 isn't justified. This is based on the estimate of Chinese ISIS soldiers, being around 5,000-15,000.
People see China as an uprising "global power", and yet get confused at the last two points. That's like poking a bear and not expecting it to maul one's face off. It started with the "Sick man of the East", now it's "they want to dethrone us". Yeah, same shitty rhetoric used on the Nips. It's gonna be India getting the ChiCom treatment in the next decade, as all those globohomo consooomer brands move out of China because paying $5 an hour is getting too much when they can do $0.5 in SEA and India.
The rest are completely lopsided Western projection, which all began with Trump. I made an autistic post about the so called "Uygurs" in the Voosh thread. Basically, I hate those camps but minorities enjoy far more benefits than the supermajority, more than being Black in America. That's the exact opposite of national socialism. There's enough Hans to breed all of them out, yet these commies have autistic rules on interracial marriage. There's said to be up to 1 million in those camps, of course asserted without any evidence. I personally think it's way lower (maybe 150k), but even 1 isn't justified. This is based on the estimate of Chinese ISIS soldiers, being around 5,000-15,000.
People see China as an uprising "global power", and yet get confused at the last two points. That's like poking a bear and not expecting it to maul one's face off. It started with the "Sick man of the East", now it's "they want to dethrone us". Yeah, same shitty rhetoric used on the Nips. It's gonna be India getting the ChiCom treatment in the next decade, as all those globohomo consooomer brands move out of China because paying $5 an hour is getting too much when they can do $0.5 in SEA and India.
There's also no dumb spiritual race bullshit and pseudoscientific pagan crap going on there. If you try to compare similarities, you'd be surprised that many states kind of resemble national socialism. Trump fits many of the points, with cult of personality added. Biden fits some, add in demonisation of the different. Bibi ticks all the boxes besides one-party (China has 8, but they are a unitary state, the parties won't disagree much with each other, though they've done it historically and nothing stops them from doing it in the future), and ticks a lot of the gay spiritual race/chosen people bullshit too.
You have to remember that Xi isn't even supposed to be in power. Every 10 years there is supposed to be a change in leadership flipping from Xi's totally not a separate party "coastal communists" to totally not a separate party "inner communists" in primary leadership.
Xi held onto power despite this limitation, which only makes the Hitler comparison even easier.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
What would you even do after 10 years in power straight? 8 years of being president turned Obama into the Cryptkeeper. Not sure how Xinnie the Pooh is keeping up.
Chinese dark magic and aborted Slant eyes.
Seriously though, you have to remember that its pretty much uncontested power. Obama, and every American president, has to fight for every policy they want to enact or stop (for good reason).
Xi can snap his fingers and make everyone in China go into public and start dancing in the nude. Its stressful sure, but not as stressful as a truly Democratic presidency.
DumbDude42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2019
being president of the us is 95% dealing with internal opposition and the petty bickering that is party politics, only 5% actual ruling
being dictator of an authoritarian state on the other hand is like 95% ruling and 5% praying that your internal rivals don't coup to depose you
highlighter_shitposting
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2021
I am not gonna tackle the rest of your retardation here, but please tell me what do you think will happen if Uygurs protest against Xi
Kitten Kalamity
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2021
Borderline socialist but precisely fascist. Mussolini and Hitler both operated with socialism as a basis for their ideology. Their attitude towards private enterprises was one of the main points of deviation. The fascist and Nat-Soc state allowed the existence and (to some extent) flourishing of private enterprise but only in the capacity that it benefitted the state and did not compete with it. The fascist state retains a control of strategically important industries and resources while allowing private actors to continue to function in a heavily restricted form. The idea was conceived as a way for the fascist state to have its cake and eat it too. You avoid all the inefficiencies of socialism while still keeping massive control over private enterprise.
This why Mussolini formulated fascism as a 'spiritual' ideology. All strata of society was to work for the benefit of a higher power; the state. Its why Hitler still considered himself a socialist even without placing the means of production exclusively into the hands of the state or beginning to erase the bourgeoise. If every element of society is only able to work in such a way as to benefit the state then why go through the bloody process of eliminating the bourgeoisie when he can force their personal interest to coincide with those of the state. That's the fascist economic model, let the private sector work for both themselves and the state within the remit you provide and intervene when necessary. As Mussolini put it: "Fascism accepts the individual only insofar as his interests coincide with the state's."
I've included a few extra statements form both Mussolini and Hitler on the nature of the public and private sector within a fascist state.
The Doctrine of Fascism, on the Absolute Primacy of the State:
"For fascism the state is absolute, individuals, and groups relative. Individuals and groups are admissible so far as they come within the state. Instead of directing the game and guiding the material and moral progress of the community, the liberal state restricts its activities to recording the results. The Fascist State is wide awake and has a will of its own...
The State, as conceived and realized by fascism, is a spiritual and ethical entity for securing the political, juridical, and economic organization of the nation, an organization which in its origin and growth is a manifestation of the spirit...
The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporative, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and the spiritual forces of the nation, organized in their respective associations, circulate within the state."
"For fascism the state is absolute, individuals, and groups relative. Individuals and groups are admissible so far as they come within the state. Instead of directing the game and guiding the material and moral progress of the community, the liberal state restricts its activities to recording the results. The Fascist State is wide awake and has a will of its own...
The State, as conceived and realized by fascism, is a spiritual and ethical entity for securing the political, juridical, and economic organization of the nation, an organization which in its origin and growth is a manifestation of the spirit...
The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporative, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and the spiritual forces of the nation, organized in their respective associations, circulate within the state."
1931, in an interview with Richard Breitling
"To put it quite clearly: we have an economic program. Point 13 in that program demands the nationalization of all public companies, in other words socialization, or what is known here as socialism. … The good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners."
1936 Memorandum on the Four Year Plan:
"The job of the Ministry of Economics is simply to set the national economic tasks; private industry has to fulfil them. But if private industry thinks itself capable of doing this, then the National Socialist State will know how to resolve the problem on its own. Nearly four precious years have gone by now. There has been time enough in four years to find out what we cannot do. Now we have to carry out what we can do."
"To put it quite clearly: we have an economic program. Point 13 in that program demands the nationalization of all public companies, in other words socialization, or what is known here as socialism. … The good of the community takes priority over that of the individual. But the State should retain control; every owner should feel himself to be an agent of the State; it is his duty not to misuse his possessions to the detriment of the State or the interests of his fellow countrymen. That is the overriding point. The Third Reich will always retain the right to control property owners."
1936 Memorandum on the Four Year Plan:
"The job of the Ministry of Economics is simply to set the national economic tasks; private industry has to fulfil them. But if private industry thinks itself capable of doing this, then the National Socialist State will know how to resolve the problem on its own. Nearly four precious years have gone by now. There has been time enough in four years to find out what we cannot do. Now we have to carry out what we can do."
I would argue that the CCP enacts racist policy especially towards the Uyghurs, Tibetans, and Mongolians but lets put that aside for just now. Racial laws are obviously historically tied with National Socialism but you run into odd absurdities if you try to hold that its and inherent aspect of fascism. In Italy the initial vogue in fascist racial theory was the idea of multi-ethnic mediterraneanism that Mussolini also initially supported. It wasn't until 1938 when he desperately wanted to suck up to Hitler that Mussolini implemented any kind of racial law and even then it wasn't enforced in any significant way until 5 years later during the Italian Civil war where the SRI was effectively a Nazi puppet. Add to that the fact that high profile fascists like Grandi, Balbo, and Ciano were highly opposed to the racial laws and you end up in an odd situation. If racist policies are pre-requisite for fascism, was Mussolini, the founder of fascism, not a fascist until 15 years into his rule? Then there's also the issue of Salazar's Portugal, Francoist Spain, and Metaxas' Greece which didn't enact any racial laws at all.
I should also make a distinction. There is a difference between a country having a large amount of racists and a country having racist policies. I don't dispute that a lot of people in Italy at the time were very racist. But, if you want to define any country with a racist population or racist rulers as fascist then the definition means almost nothing. Almost every society throughout history has discriminated based on race or ethnicity. If you want to go more broadly and say that the othering of demonization of the other then you also have the same issue. You barely rule out anything and also include a massive amount of plainly non-fascist countries.
I don't know how you can have both Trump and Biden resemble national socialism in anything except the most vague and superficial sense. I'm very interested in your definition of Fascism. If I were try myself I would probably say that fascism is an anti-individualist pseudo-spiritual ideology that seeks to subordinate all aspects of society, from the top to the bottom, under the state.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
People in the Soviet Union called that tax "tax on balls". Childless men were similarly taxed.