- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2021
Averages about one post every two months, but seems to come in bursts where she remembers she has an shoe0nhead instagram account and posts for a few days in a row and then forgets about it for another 5-10 months. I don't know how much of those gaps or apparent inactivity over the years is a byproduct of her deleteing all traces of Greg, though. But simpstagram doesn't make her any money, so that might be why she doesn't tend to it as much.
You'd probably have a better indication by looking at how much time she spends on her simpcord and, sorry, I'm not that committed to this research.
OTOH, her YouTube posting is nearly as erratic as the instagram history. She'd probably never be able to maintain a steady subscriber base on OnlyFans.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
I'll never understand why so many people come to the shoe0nhead thread for informed political discussion.
I'm not even really complaining, the posts are easy enough to skip, but the irony, man.
I'm not even really complaining, the posts are easy enough to skip, but the irony, man.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
June. show more tits, say something stupid, or take another black dick already; the kiwis are going restless and getting deep thoughts again.
Goy Sheckelstein
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2020
I've always found shoe on head to be extremely pretty. She still has a good body, ngl
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
Cuz they want to fuck her and not feel as shallow as they actually are.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2017
What kind of person fucks others for their smarts? That's not what "fucking your brains out" means.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
I think it's probably more that thing where guys will think girls they wanna fuck are smarter and cooler than they actually are.
This South Park clip explains it:
Chris Mclean
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
No wonder that the state of the guntboard is so shit when it has an actual CCP simp as a mod.
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2017
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2020
Xi holds power because he remains in control of the two most powerful organs of Government, the NPC, and the CMC. The President position in the CCP is a largely ceremonial one, but Xi is not just the president, he's the paramount leader, an informal term which basically means he controls the most/most powerful organs of Government. Even if he weren't the President, he'd still be the paramount leader, which is actually how it was in 2012, before he became President
Based CCP shill. Paper tiger hidden dragon
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
I've re-read my original post and saw how it went wrong, I'll concede and state that the ratings are well deserved. I fucked up basic explanation as usual in a rambling retarded word salad posted before bed.
Xi however abolished that, so it's not the case anymore. I find it quite despicable and I'm no fan of Winnie. Out of all the Chinese leaders, there's probably three of four that I actually like (with maybe 10 asterisks attached because I'm autistic).
CPC used this to justify those gay camps, absolute Chinamen tactics. Instead of finding a workable common ground, just remove the problem.
Do two wongs make a wright? No.
FYI, because of this, I also see plenty Western and Chinese prejudice against India, many of which are either blurry overblown tiny factoids or just downright false/fake and gay news.
Now the autistic part. @Kitten Kalamity
The definition of socialism Hitler and other fascists used isn't the same as what we have now. To my understanding, they've essentially anchored themselves to "socialist" and "workers" as an attempt to garner lower-middle-class clout. Mao weaponised peasantry, farmers, and workers by branding his version of communism as a revolutionary struggle, with a weird imposition of Chinese nationalism and overt focus on the rural areas. This was alien to Marxism, which postulated communism as an inevitable outcome of extreme capitalism. Marx believed that communism will come naturally after heavy capitalist industrialisation; Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and other notable communist tyrants took that utopian premise and didn't want natural progression, but instead they wanted to twist nature to achieve communism. Obviously, that failed big time. In this aspect however, we can have a middle ground, the fascists and communists both used rhetoric to weaponise masses in order to gain power. All dictatorships do this.
China's economic model is a combination of competing heavily state-subsidised enterprises and state owned enterprises, along with extreme capitalism. Deng, Jiang and then Hu's approach was mostly Laissez-faire. Hu is as far right as Pinochet on his economical policies if you've read it. As I've said, most scarce resources, most infrastructure companies and all telecommunication companies (including major media outlets) are either subsidised or state-owned. The rest aren't, and they are allowed (until the recent half a decade) to disregard intellectual property laws, copyright, and some fuck up the environment too. Even the Chinamen aren't dumb enough to continue Mao's nonsense and understand the danger of capital freight and unhappy peasants. Being the biggest exporter of shitty replica goods and junk electronics doesn't further the state's ambitions to be some kind of big dog, it's the opposite. Made in China is synonymous with trash, rightfully so. Made in Korea and earlier Made in Japan used to have that plague, now Korean products are sometimes even better than Japanese ones which they've previously attempted to replicate. It's up to the bug men to prove their merits.
The only aspect of fascism applicable would be their (CPC's) control over information, and the means to obtain such control. Information should only serve the supremacy of the state, they batter private companies with law enforcement and threaten shutdown if they don't comply. The CPC uses propaganda such as "the evil west will spread misinformation" to justify their firewall and own disinformation campaigns, as if the citizens aren't allowed to make up their own minds. (Answer to that is a "yes", don't think for youself). Very fascist.
The CPC enacts racist policies all over the place. I regard racism as unequal treatment base on an inherent pigment of colour. This means affirmative action and native only programmes are also racist. To me, they are also necessary, and not a bad thing.
We'd make fun of Islam not being a race, but most can't deny that Islam is synonymous to "middle eastern brown people". The same applies to China, Islam is inherent to several racial minorities such as the Hui and Uygurs, there's also a massive Han Muslim population that resides in Xinjiang. There's also Buddhists and obviously Christians that no one in west's lamestream media seems to care about because that will break their libtard fantasy of a progressive stack.
This leads to a conundrum. If you look at China's history, you'll see groups at war with each other and each dynasty is plagued with at least a couple genocides. While we're at it, during the Qing Dynasty, the Uygur Muslims declared jihad on Han and Hui Muslims because they saw them as heretics. They managed to wipe out many towns before the Qing emperor wiped them out, and went further to reclaim Xinjing. The Qings also wiped out Buddhist groups who were revolting against the state. The Han majority can either completely consume the other 55 minority groups, or the CPC can manufacture a "new Chinese" identity and promote nationalism, while trying their best to preserve the existence of the 55 racial groups. The Hans are basically some kind of superbreed, most carry minority blood and Manchurian genes to some extent, which carries Mongolian and a lot of nomadic tribal genes.
CPC went with the latter when the former is clearly the beneficial one, at least for the state. If I were a fascist that doesn't like pointless bloody genocides, I'll just move massive groups into those areas and breed them all out of existence. Historically in China, whenever religious groups challenge the state, the state just kills them all. This happened under every single dynasty, and allegedly during the early years of Republic of China (aimed at the Manchurians) and People's Republic of China (aimed at Mongolians). The former is documented very well, the latter is fuelled by so called witnesses and various conspiracies. I think it's all true to some extent, but the two recent "dynasties" have been pretty decent at not committing full blown genocides. Hell, Mao was good at killing his own people, namely millions of Hans starving to death and getting prosecuted for bogus faggoty commie thoughtcrimes.
Minority groups in China get a shit load of benefits, Hans who marry minorities are made to settle there and enjoy plentiful benefits too. I've rarely seen any outlets mention this. I'll list out some of the persecution too, it's obviously not rainbows and sunshine with the fucking CPC.
My definition of fascism is somewhat strict.
"An extreme civic nationalist, collectivist, traditionalist, and tyrannical state where all peoples exist to further the state's goals. Private enterprises are kept in check under the regime, everything important to life is state owned. This state is anti-capitalist, anti-communist, anti-religion (or mono-religious, downright theocratic), and the economic policies are there to further the state's goals (third position) Dissidents are made into examples, coerced into submission, depersoned, or exiled."
There's some problems with the definition, Giovanni Gentile argued for open discourse, which got him killed by ANTIFA but he's sort of an outlier. With such a definition, there's states with overall fascistic tendencies such as ISIS and probably some extreme religious country nobody cares about in Africa. We'll have look at broader policies instead of finding isolated examples to fit the definition. So neither China nor the USA, or any notable countries practice fascism.
The biggest issue with China and any other overbearing controlling states is information. China has zero transparency, this makes even the most insane conspiracies seem plausible. Even when they attempt to open up, they will enlist a bunch of requirements making them seem guilty as fuck. Unless you can read the language, 100% of your news is going to be against the PRC. Nobody believes China's shitty state owned outlets that are allowed on Twitter because nobody in China is allowed on western social media. This creates a unique situation where even people inside China doesn't believe what China's state owned media propagates to the outside. An example is Dr. Li Wenliang's death. CCTV announced it early on western platforms, there was a delay of 3 or 4 hours on Chinese news. People got mad and thought the rescue effort was a show, which... turned out to be fucking true. The doctor died at 11pm, they symbolically tried to revive him for 3 hours and announced the death at 3am the next day. Obviously the CPC never learn such lessons. A lot of these conspiracies are easily rebutted only if the CPC was more transparent on information.
This is also why whenever someone borderline cites an agreement, or even a different opinion, they are called a wumao. The only thing I really like about the CPC is their expanding of infrastructure and weird post-modern esoteric architecture, their social practices are absolutely trash, albeit it's "getting better" as actual shills will say, I mean everything is better compared to fucking Mao, you'd get executed for anti-revolutionary crimes (luckily this law has been abolished) if you broke a plate with Mao's face on it, pathetic. 80% of Mao's policies have been utter disasters because commies don't economics. I'm very divided on current China's economic practices. There's aspects that resonates well, and some that are just rubbish.
If you or anyone wants to continue this, we should move to deep thoughts or something.
Logging off? We need a log off counter at this point. She's probably pretending to be outraged, but it's hard to tell nowadays.
archive.is
I thought you're gonna log off?
All I see are ants. https://archive.md/wip/I1R6c
"No refunds" and "bought two more mansions" is missing for the old twat Bernie, though voting against the patriot act and protecting whistle blowers is based.
Not true anymore, that's old information. It was similar to America, but with a term of 5 years and similarly imposed maximum consecutive of two terms.
Xi however abolished that, so it's not the case anymore. I find it quite despicable and I'm no fan of Winnie. Out of all the Chinese leaders, there's probably three of four that I actually like (with maybe 10 asterisks attached because I'm autistic).
Happened before, knife attacks and car bombs of peace to name a few. They got shot.
CPC used this to justify those gay camps, absolute Chinamen tactics. Instead of finding a workable common ground, just remove the problem.
That's not shilling for CPC, that's simply removing gay prejudice and seeing dumb western contradictions. Plenty exist in China media too that's targeted towards the evil capitalists (it's called 中國特色社會主義 when we do capitalism!). I'm sure you can name a few.
Do two wongs make a wright? No.
FYI, because of this, I also see plenty Western and Chinese prejudice against India, many of which are either blurry overblown tiny factoids or just downright false/fake and gay news.
Now the autistic part. @Kitten Kalamity
I don't agree.
The definition of socialism Hitler and other fascists used isn't the same as what we have now. To my understanding, they've essentially anchored themselves to "socialist" and "workers" as an attempt to garner lower-middle-class clout. Mao weaponised peasantry, farmers, and workers by branding his version of communism as a revolutionary struggle, with a weird imposition of Chinese nationalism and overt focus on the rural areas. This was alien to Marxism, which postulated communism as an inevitable outcome of extreme capitalism. Marx believed that communism will come naturally after heavy capitalist industrialisation; Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and other notable communist tyrants took that utopian premise and didn't want natural progression, but instead they wanted to twist nature to achieve communism. Obviously, that failed big time. In this aspect however, we can have a middle ground, the fascists and communists both used rhetoric to weaponise masses in order to gain power. All dictatorships do this.
China's economic model is a combination of competing heavily state-subsidised enterprises and state owned enterprises, along with extreme capitalism. Deng, Jiang and then Hu's approach was mostly Laissez-faire. Hu is as far right as Pinochet on his economical policies if you've read it. As I've said, most scarce resources, most infrastructure companies and all telecommunication companies (including major media outlets) are either subsidised or state-owned. The rest aren't, and they are allowed (until the recent half a decade) to disregard intellectual property laws, copyright, and some fuck up the environment too. Even the Chinamen aren't dumb enough to continue Mao's nonsense and understand the danger of capital freight and unhappy peasants. Being the biggest exporter of shitty replica goods and junk electronics doesn't further the state's ambitions to be some kind of big dog, it's the opposite. Made in China is synonymous with trash, rightfully so. Made in Korea and earlier Made in Japan used to have that plague, now Korean products are sometimes even better than Japanese ones which they've previously attempted to replicate. It's up to the bug men to prove their merits.
The only aspect of fascism applicable would be their (CPC's) control over information, and the means to obtain such control. Information should only serve the supremacy of the state, they batter private companies with law enforcement and threaten shutdown if they don't comply. The CPC uses propaganda such as "the evil west will spread misinformation" to justify their firewall and own disinformation campaigns, as if the citizens aren't allowed to make up their own minds. (Answer to that is a "yes", don't think for youself). Very fascist.
I agree on this point. Yeah, racism and anti-Semitism isn't inherent to fascistic ideologies. Nazism only took the latter to its extreme. Fascism is some kind of combination of extreme civic nationalism, authoritarianism and economic centrism.
The CPC enacts racist policies all over the place. I regard racism as unequal treatment base on an inherent pigment of colour. This means affirmative action and native only programmes are also racist. To me, they are also necessary, and not a bad thing.
We'd make fun of Islam not being a race, but most can't deny that Islam is synonymous to "middle eastern brown people". The same applies to China, Islam is inherent to several racial minorities such as the Hui and Uygurs, there's also a massive Han Muslim population that resides in Xinjiang. There's also Buddhists and obviously Christians that no one in west's lamestream media seems to care about because that will break their libtard fantasy of a progressive stack.
This leads to a conundrum. If you look at China's history, you'll see groups at war with each other and each dynasty is plagued with at least a couple genocides. While we're at it, during the Qing Dynasty, the Uygur Muslims declared jihad on Han and Hui Muslims because they saw them as heretics. They managed to wipe out many towns before the Qing emperor wiped them out, and went further to reclaim Xinjing. The Qings also wiped out Buddhist groups who were revolting against the state. The Han majority can either completely consume the other 55 minority groups, or the CPC can manufacture a "new Chinese" identity and promote nationalism, while trying their best to preserve the existence of the 55 racial groups. The Hans are basically some kind of superbreed, most carry minority blood and Manchurian genes to some extent, which carries Mongolian and a lot of nomadic tribal genes.
CPC went with the latter when the former is clearly the beneficial one, at least for the state. If I were a fascist that doesn't like pointless bloody genocides, I'll just move massive groups into those areas and breed them all out of existence. Historically in China, whenever religious groups challenge the state, the state just kills them all. This happened under every single dynasty, and allegedly during the early years of Republic of China (aimed at the Manchurians) and People's Republic of China (aimed at Mongolians). The former is documented very well, the latter is fuelled by so called witnesses and various conspiracies. I think it's all true to some extent, but the two recent "dynasties" have been pretty decent at not committing full blown genocides. Hell, Mao was good at killing his own people, namely millions of Hans starving to death and getting prosecuted for bogus faggoty commie thoughtcrimes.
Minority groups in China get a shit load of benefits, Hans who marry minorities are made to settle there and enjoy plentiful benefits too. I've rarely seen any outlets mention this. I'll list out some of the persecution too, it's obviously not rainbows and sunshine with the fucking CPC.
- Gaokao affirmative action, minors get +50 points in some places. It's usually a good 20-30. Han fascists get mad at this.
- State gibs, from money to giving jobs out
- Interracial marriage is discouraged because a Han marrying a minority must reside in said area, which is backwards compared to the rest of the country, that's why even with gibs, not a lot of Hans want to marry them. The state does provide interracial marriage gibs, but this promotion is obviously not working well
- Affirmative action in Masters' degrees and PhD programs, once again a big leg up
- The offspring of interracial coupling's minority status is decided by the parents before 18. With all the gibs and boosts, nobody in their right mind will choose Han.
- If your interracial coupled parents are retarded enough to choose Han, you can revert to the minority group once you turn 18 and gain independence.
- Camps specifically built to indoctrinate Uygurs with the socially constructed identity. Up to 2 million could be there.
- China says the camps equip them with skills to find a job and will eventually close. I have no idea why they thought this made them sound any better.
- Religious persecution. Want to build a public Mosque/Temple/Church? You need approval. Don't want it? Well, they'll just demolish it and throw you in jail or give a hefty fine.
- Mobility issues, it's said to be impossible for minors to move their Hukou or registered residence elsewhere. CPC wants to protect their cultural zones but also denies them some pretty basic fucking rights on where they reside.
FYI, I've visited many of these places, it's a cultural shock. That's why I absolutely do not buy all the "cultural genocide" bullshit peddled by interest groups who shiver away when South African farmers are brought up.
- State gibs, from money to giving jobs out
- Interracial marriage is discouraged because a Han marrying a minority must reside in said area, which is backwards compared to the rest of the country, that's why even with gibs, not a lot of Hans want to marry them. The state does provide interracial marriage gibs, but this promotion is obviously not working well
- Affirmative action in Masters' degrees and PhD programs, once again a big leg up
- The offspring of interracial coupling's minority status is decided by the parents before 18. With all the gibs and boosts, nobody in their right mind will choose Han.
- If your interracial coupled parents are retarded enough to choose Han, you can revert to the minority group once you turn 18 and gain independence.
- Camps specifically built to indoctrinate Uygurs with the socially constructed identity. Up to 2 million could be there.
- China says the camps equip them with skills to find a job and will eventually close. I have no idea why they thought this made them sound any better.
- Religious persecution. Want to build a public Mosque/Temple/Church? You need approval. Don't want it? Well, they'll just demolish it and throw you in jail or give a hefty fine.
- Mobility issues, it's said to be impossible for minors to move their Hukou or registered residence elsewhere. CPC wants to protect their cultural zones but also denies them some pretty basic fucking rights on where they reside.
FYI, I've visited many of these places, it's a cultural shock. That's why I absolutely do not buy all the "cultural genocide" bullshit peddled by interest groups who shiver away when South African farmers are brought up.
Eastern Asians are racist as fuck, the most racist group on the planet. SEA is the opposite, at least from my interactions. Even internally, there's very creative derogatory slurs aimed at countrymen of different states/provinces/even-fucking-suburbs.
Yeah, that was a dumb sleep deprived ramble. I was trying to say that calling countries "fascist" by listing vague similarities is circular reasoning. I used the dumbest and lamest examples. If I started from the conclusion, then I can find many aspects of various leaders/countries with "fascist inclinations", but that's not how arguments work.
My definition of fascism is somewhat strict.
"An extreme civic nationalist, collectivist, traditionalist, and tyrannical state where all peoples exist to further the state's goals. Private enterprises are kept in check under the regime, everything important to life is state owned. This state is anti-capitalist, anti-communist, anti-religion (or mono-religious, downright theocratic), and the economic policies are there to further the state's goals (third position) Dissidents are made into examples, coerced into submission, depersoned, or exiled."
There's some problems with the definition, Giovanni Gentile argued for open discourse, which got him killed by ANTIFA but he's sort of an outlier. With such a definition, there's states with overall fascistic tendencies such as ISIS and probably some extreme religious country nobody cares about in Africa. We'll have look at broader policies instead of finding isolated examples to fit the definition. So neither China nor the USA, or any notable countries practice fascism.
The biggest issue with China and any other overbearing controlling states is information. China has zero transparency, this makes even the most insane conspiracies seem plausible. Even when they attempt to open up, they will enlist a bunch of requirements making them seem guilty as fuck. Unless you can read the language, 100% of your news is going to be against the PRC. Nobody believes China's shitty state owned outlets that are allowed on Twitter because nobody in China is allowed on western social media. This creates a unique situation where even people inside China doesn't believe what China's state owned media propagates to the outside. An example is Dr. Li Wenliang's death. CCTV announced it early on western platforms, there was a delay of 3 or 4 hours on Chinese news. People got mad and thought the rescue effort was a show, which... turned out to be fucking true. The doctor died at 11pm, they symbolically tried to revive him for 3 hours and announced the death at 3am the next day. Obviously the CPC never learn such lessons. A lot of these conspiracies are easily rebutted only if the CPC was more transparent on information.
This is also why whenever someone borderline cites an agreement, or even a different opinion, they are called a wumao. The only thing I really like about the CPC is their expanding of infrastructure and weird post-modern esoteric architecture, their social practices are absolutely trash, albeit it's "getting better" as actual shills will say, I mean everything is better compared to fucking Mao, you'd get executed for anti-revolutionary crimes (luckily this law has been abolished) if you broke a plate with Mao's face on it, pathetic. 80% of Mao's policies have been utter disasters because commies don't economics. I'm very divided on current China's economic practices. There's aspects that resonates well, and some that are just rubbish.
Logging off? We need a log off counter at this point. She's probably pretending to be outraged, but it's hard to tell nowadays.
shoe on Twitter: "i'm genuinely mad at this i'm logging off… "
archived 24 Apr 2021 22:22:21 UTC
I thought you're gonna log off?
All I see are ants. https://archive.md/wip/I1R6c
"No refunds" and "bought two more mansions" is missing for the old twat Bernie, though voting against the patriot act and protecting whistle blowers is based.
Chris Mclean
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
Huey long in the top left
This was either made by an idiot or a troll and if it was a troll god bless you.- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
Guys. Guys. Idubbz girlfriend, actual internet whore Anisa, is getting married before June.
June has fucked up so badly that now, all the Skeptics are happily married, and even aging e-girls are getting married.
June has fucked up so badly that now, all the Skeptics are happily married, and even aging e-girls are getting married.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
They also placed FDR in top left, nigga what?Huey long in the top left
Goy Sheckelstein
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2020
They won't last, and will end in an acrimonious divorce.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
But June didn't even last until the marriage itself. So she still loses.
Chris Mclean
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
But... but.. Ben Shapiro hates him so he must be a based coommunist like me!
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2020
FDR was a racist thug who suppressed freedom of the press and threatened to stack the courts to force them to rule his insane decrees as constitutional because he would not work with Congress to pass legislation like he was supposed to. He literally interned US citizens based on their race. If that's not authoritarian left, I don't know what is.