Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

Has anyone seen this woman? I am very sorry if you have.
1619537576255.png
Chantal also responds to "GUNT".
 
But there was also this comment (among others of the same kind) in the same screenshot :

View attachment 2122548


Besides the fact this stupid enabler can't tell the difference between miserable people and concerned ones, imagine encouraging someone who "enjoys her life" by snorting coke and being used as a cum dumpster, all while losing her tv and dignity along with it. Or, worse, encouraging someone who's pretending it's happening but it's actually all lies.

Oh Nathalie. If only you knew how much the average person prefers its miserable life.
And the good laugh we, KFers, get from Chantal's "best life" . :story:
These kinds of comments amuse me.

They are funny because not only do they scold other people for making rational observations on a public spectacle, they are also virtue signals, Natalie Bellian is proud of Clotso's enjoyment of her new life of drugs, abusive relationships, and disregard for safety and health of herself and others. Because Natalie is supportive, she is not a critic. Since critics are miserable in their own lives, Natalie is really telling the world that she is happy with her life.

She may really be happy; I would have to look into her heart to know. However, being the dingbat she is, she used her real name, which is uncommon enough that only one person in the United States has this exact name. I won't bother linking her dox here because it is minimal and standard mylife.com stuff. But I will note that mylife ranks her low in reputation. She is a 56 year old woman living in Rochester NY (which is the poor man's Syracuse), her highest education was a high school diploma, she apparently has a history of bankruptcies and liens against her, her husband appears to also be a deadbeat and seems to have an arrest record, and she apparently lives in a run-down neighborhood of scoundrels, many of whom have legal troubles. She also does not seem to have left any kind of employment footprint on the web.

Do this mean she must be unhappy? Not necessarily, although it is also not necessarily a list of ingredients for happiness. Is it conceivable that some "haters" and "critics" have what would appear to be far more interesting and fulfilling lives on paper? Yes, it is conceivable.

Natalie's curriculum vitae is far from the worst I have seen among Clotso's adoring fans (and I have checked a lot of them out). A significantly large portion seem unlikely to have graduated high school or worked in their lives. A high percentage are fat, poor, in poor health, and bearing chips on their shoulders. But even as the cream of the crop, Natalie seems to have lived an underwhelming life.

Maybe I am a powerleveling fool, but despite my being a longterm and vocal critic of Clotso, I just don't seem to feel miserable. I look deep within for signs of misery, and come up empty. Perhaps that makes me a monster, but even monsters can have satisfying, pleasant lives. I'm not claiming to be better than anyone else, but the default assumption that a Clotso critic must be miserable and have no life seems fallacious to me. Especially in comparison to the lives of her supporters.
 
These kinds of comments amuse me.

They are funny because not only do they scold other people for making rational observations on a public spectacle, they are also virtue signals, Natalie Bellian is proud of Clotso's enjoyment of her new life of drugs, abusive relationships, and disregard for safety and health of herself and others. Because Natalie is supportive, she is not a critic. Since critics are miserable in their own lives, Natalie is really telling the world that she is happy with her life.

She may really be happy; I would have to look into her heart to know. However, being the dingbat she is, she used her real name, which is uncommon enough that only one person in the United States has this exact name. I won't bother linking her dox here because it is minimal and standard mylife.com stuff. But I will note that mylife ranks her low in reputation. She is a 56 year old woman living in Rochester NY (which is the poor man's Syracuse), her highest education was a high school diploma, she apparently has a history of bankruptcies and liens against her, her husband appears to also be a deadbeat and seems to have an arrest record, and she apparently lives in a run-down neighborhood of scoundrels, many of whom have legal troubles. She also does not seem to have left any kind of employment footprint on the web.

Do this mean she must be unhappy? Not necessarily, although it is also not necessarily a list of ingredients for happiness. Is it conceivable that some "haters" and "critics" have what would appear to be far more interesting and fulfilling lives on paper? Yes, it is conceivable.

Natalie's curriculum vitae is far from the worst I have seen among Clotso's adoring fans (and I have checked a lot of them out). A significantly large portion seem unlikely to have graduated high school or worked in their lives. A high percentage are fat, poor, in poor health, and bearing chips on their shoulders. But even as the cream of the crop, Natalie seems to have lived an underwhelming life.

Maybe I am a powerleveling fool, but despite my being a longterm and vocal critic of Clotso, I just don't seem to feel miserable. I look deep within for signs of misery, and come up empty. Perhaps that makes me a monster, but even monsters can have satisfying, pleasant lives. I'm not claiming to be better than anyone else, but the default assumption that a Clotso critic must be miserable and have no life seems fallacious to me. Especially in comparison to the lives of her supporters.
A lot of these people are possibly total losers whose parents told them the same "they are miserable inside" story to placate them when they didn't get invited to the cool kids' parties. And I hate to use the term "losers," but decent people don't console themselves with fantasies about other people's suffering.

They finally find someone fat/desperate/ugly/gluttonous lieabout who glorifies all the things they are. Leave their queen alone!
 
Guys she's pulling an ALR.

"What are you guys even TALKING about, Becky's been here the whole time."

100% she comes back with, "OMG I've been sooooooo busy. What, you guys thought he murdered me and cut me up in his bathtub? HI SHAMMMMMM! You guys are fucking stupid. Seriously."
 
Unrelated, but I have to say I'm really surprised we don't hear about grandma more often. Not because I think she's capable of really caring about anyone but herself, but because it seems like such an easy way to garner a bit of sympathy here and there. (Like how she rarely missed an opportunity to show what a gOoD pErSoN she was by mentioning bringing grandma food or helping her around her house.) IIRC the last time we got a significant, sad sack grannie update was when she was trying to deflect from the plethora of new horrifying health problems she'd been diagnosed with. Really surprised she isn't milking the situation more.
Well, it's guaranteed we'll hear about Grandma now. All of Chantal's best storylines come from here.
 
And don't forget we heard how incredibly SMART James is. Yes Chantal lies.
Does anyone more autistic with a better memory remember what Chantal said about Peetz before we were introduced to him, besides commenting on his intelligence? We all know she exaggerates like crazy, like with her 8-pack coke dealer, who in reality is most likely Fat Amy's husband's doppelganger.

I'd like to know how Chantal described Peetz and how much she lied about what an alpha male, Chippendale-physiqued, sexy rebel boy she dated before Bibi. Considering she admitted to aggressively pursuing him, she must have described him as crazy hot, right..?

The excitement over the Mr. Egypt has pushed out all previous knowledge of her early videos from my brain.
 
I'd like to know how Chantal described Peetz and how much she lied about what an alpha male, Chippendale-physiqued, sexy rebel boy she dated before Bibi. Considering she admitted to aggressively pursuing him, she must have described him as crazy hot, right..?
Honestly from what i recall , she never really talked great about him ! More like ,she always had pity for him . To be fair , the way she described him and his personality was on point .
 
well I guess it’s working... subs going up View attachment 2123223

Say thank you to Charlie Gold, Chantal. Lmao

Honestly, the big reaction channels like Zachary Michael and Charlie Gold coming back recently is probably to blame for this. The new subscribers are all train wreck watchers and haydurs and a lot of her old subscribers left. A subplot of scary foreign men and hard drug usage doesn't attract fans & supporters. I suspect her channel is going to start to become and lot more hostile toward her.
 
Does anyone more autistic with a better memory remember what Chantal said about Peetz before we were introduced to him, besides commenting on his intelligence? We all know she exaggerates like crazy, like with her 8-pack coke dealer, who in reality is most likely Fat Amy's husband's doppelganger.

I'd like to know how Chantal described Peetz and how much she lied about what an alpha male, Chippendale-physiqued, sexy rebel boy she dated before Bibi. Considering she admitted to aggressively pursuing him, she must have described him as crazy hot, right..?

The excitement over the Mr. Egypt has pushed out all previous knowledge of her early videos from my brain.
Here's a good summary:

Here's the original video about "Claude" aka James:

She's still alive, btw:
1619544202501.png
 
Only in the amphitheater of erudition that is YouTube could a user gain more attention by doing nothing than by doing anything.
She was losing subs BECAUSE she was uploading. It was like a constant reminder of her existence to her subscribers when she was live-streaming nonstop.
But I can’t say I understand why she’s gained subs the past two days, maybe it really is from the reaction channels because that’s literally the only possible explanation other than buying them.
 
She was losing subs BECAUSE she was uploading. It was like a constant reminder of her existence to her subscribers when she was live-streaming nonstop.
But I can’t say I understand why she’s gained subs the past two days, maybe it really is from the reaction channels because that’s literally the only possible explanation other than buying them.
OR people are subbing to get notified when she goes live since she's been MIA.. can you get notifications without being a sub?
 
She was losing subs BECAUSE she was uploading. It was like a constant reminder of her existence to her subscribers when she was live-streaming nonstop.
But I can’t say I understand why she’s gained subs the past two days, maybe it really is from the reaction channels because that’s literally the only possible explanation other than buying them.
She could have easily bought subscribers to make up for the lost ones. It's pretty inexpensive.


If she were to end up gaining back all that she lost, that would be pretty sus.

I don't know why a hayder would want to subscribe to her channel after watching reactions. There are always comments on those channels that say something along the lines of "I watch your channel so I don't have to give her views."
 
1619550676441.png

I have received a video from Chantal. She claims she is fine, but will not be posting to YouTube anymore. She has seen the light of Allah and Muhammad (﷽) and has joined Islam. She intends to Hajj with her boyfriend and return to Egypt with him, insh'Allah.
 
Back