Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

on your back or on all fours,
This is the extent of what you think women envision sex as? That's comical.

First you acknowledge I'm in my 30s and then you think all I fantasize about is missionary or doggie style. That's hysterical, because a woman over 30 is way more sexually complex than that!

Thanks for confirming once again that women's sexuality is largely misunderstood!


@TamarYaelBatYah I know you don't come on here that much anymore, and neither do I, but I wanted to hopefully imprint one final word of advice for you. Even if its the only takeaway you have from me over the past year....

Legend has it that a man named the "Hillside Ass Snatcher" roams the hills of Appalachia snatching peoples' butts. Sometimes when one is falling asleep late at night they can hear off in the distance, "whooooo wanna seeee myyy buuuttttt?" Now, I know you ignored my advice last time, but take it from my own experience. If you hear that voice count to three and very silently say "They do." Apparently the ass snatcher thrives on fear. What he wants more than anything is to instill fear into the residents of Appalachia. He has many victims. These people are condemned to live a sad, long life with no ass. Like literally once he steals their butts there is nothing left down there. Just skin and bone. No cheek.
The ass snatcher is a specter, the Torah won't save anyone from him.
Anyways, could be a myth I dont know, but whenever I hear the voice I silently say "They do> They wanna see your butt" and nothing has ever happened to me.

View attachment 2112164
Ever heard of the Appalachian Woodbooger?
 
First you acknowledge I'm in my 30s and then you think all I fantasize about is missionary or doggie style. That's hysterical, because a woman over 30 is way more sexually complex than that!

Thanks for confirming once again that women's sexuality is largely misunderstood!
You have absolutely no idea what normal womens' sexuality is like either, to be fair.
 
This is the extent of what you think women envision sex as? That's comical.

First you acknowledge I'm in my 30s and then you think all I fantasize about is missionary or doggie style. That's hysterical, because a woman over 30 is way more sexually complex than that!

Thanks for confirming once again that women's sexuality is largely misunderstood!
So your only point of contention with the post is that he was too vanilla in his description of sex for you?
 
So your only point of contention with the post is that he was too vanilla in his description of sex for you?
Well yes, of course. She’s a sophisticated woman in her 30’s that dreams of a heaven with taboo and kinky sex where she fucks every single one of her descendants, and cousins for good measure.
 
You have absolutely no idea what normal womens' sexuality is like either, to be fair.
Define "normal". Is "normal" synonymous with "good"?

Here's a widow of 7 children that married a widower with 4 children.

A widow of 7 children re-marrying. Is this a "normal" manifestation of women's sexuality? After 7 children, what drives a woman to still desire sex?




So your only point of contention with the post is that he was too vanilla in his description of sex for you?
No, that's just what stood out the most to me.


No, please tell.
It's a giant hairy man-monster that lurks around the woods here.
 
No, that's just what stood out the most to me.
It was perhaps the least important part of the entire statement, a deliberate exaggeration for emphasis of a much wider point. Why did it stand out instead of the thrust of the comment which was- in effect- that your version of heaven is a non stop orgy and buffet, something you have yet to actually deny so far.
 
Define "normal". Is "normal" synonymous with "good"?

Here's a widow of 7 children that married a widower with 4 children.

A widow of 7 children re-marrying. Is this a "normal" manifestation of women's sexuality? After 7 children, what drives a woman to still desire sex?
I'm not watching that. My point is that you think every woman who chooses not to engage in frequent intercourse is a sexually repressed dustbin, therefore your opinion is skewed and untrustworthy.
 
Oh god she's back. Perhaps my previous instructions were unclear.

Melinda Scott, Kill Yourself.

If you do it today you won't have to watch your dogshit lawsuit get thrown out or watch Matthew Hardin repossess your car after Josh sues you for his fees.
 
Oh god she's back. Perhaps my previous instructions were unclear.
She's like Beetlejuice. Or Voldemort. Anybody talks about her or mentions sex and BAM! SHE APPEARS!
Btw, stuff is ok with my own he who must not be named.
 
One has to remember, a definition of a word isn't the definition Melinda uses. She has her own dictionary she uses.

Also, according to this woman. Women in Japan aren't real women because they're too busy having career and having successful lives instead of being treated like human breeding stock.
 
There's 900+ pages of proof this silly bitch doesn't understand subtlety. Some people need it spelled out to them.
Let's be honest here, we're not really talking to her that much. Even when responding to her posts we mostly talk to fellow posters and expressing our wits, eristic skills and sense of humor. She just provides subject we're talking about.
 
I'm not watching that. My point is that you think every woman who chooses not to engage in frequent intercourse is a sexually repressed dustbin, therefore your opinion is skewed and untrustworthy.

Frequent sexual intercourse for women is recommended by the majority of mental health professionals, health experts, sex therapists and couple's therapists. Frequent sex balances mood and mental health. It prevents drpression. The opposite (sexual repression) in females does in fact cause physical and mental health issues.

I saw you state on another thread that the "male sex drive would never cease to amaze [you]". So why do you think frequent desire for sex is only a male thing?

It's not normal for a woman to not want frequent sex. A woman with a low libido is that way because of social programming or health issues (including mental health issues).




One has to remember, a definition of a word isn't the definition Melinda uses. She has her own dictionary she uses.

Also, according to this woman. Women in Japan aren't real women because they're too busy having career and having successful lives instead of being treated like human breeding stock.
Giving birth to a human being is one of the most honorable and worthy things a woman can do with her time. It's a *human life* that is coming into the world through her. A woman who has birthed a child is a different type of woman. It demands a certain respect and care.

@Toasty makes the argument that a woman who has birthed a child hasn't done anything more than a rat or roach reproducing. With that, I completely disagree. The value of a human life is entirely higher than that of a rat or roach. An infant is a complex creature that is born, entirely more complex than a rat or roach. From emotions to soul structure to body movements, a newborn is much more complex and valuable than an animal or insect.

Any woman who has grown and brought a human life into the world through her body should be eligible for immediate retirement. What a task!

I'm pretty sure the only people who are going to devalue pregnancy and childbirth are barren women and sexist men. Hands down!
 
Except the human race is a parasite destroying the planet. Humans alone count towards up to 40% of the methane production. This is just from humans existing. Then you get into how much land gets destroyed to keep the human race alive. How many animals have to be used to keep feeding them, and other adverse affects the humans race causes to the earth.

Also, a human being is no more complex in terms of biology than any other organism. Only thing that sets us apart is our brains. Dolphin's and Octopi can out think toddlers, as can some birds and apes. There is no such thing as a "soul" either. That's just religious nonsense created by humans who didn't understand science.

It's also well document that animals can feel emotions, even plants can. These are quiet basic, but shows that any life form can show emotions.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Anaiah Carlson
@Toasty makes the argument that a woman who has birthed a child hasn't done anything more than a rat or roach reproducing. With that, I completely disagree. The value of a human life is entirely higher than that of a rat or roach
The argument could be made that a woman has done substantially less. Rats and roaches are very complex creatures, with as much evidence for a soul as humans. In fact they are far more efficient and successful at bearing offspring than humans, and upon giving birth don't turn into Karens who think that deserve a medal for doing what they are evolutionarily prepared and have a biological imperative to do. But it's not just the little useful cleaners of our world like rats and roaches. It's every living thing. It's one of the qualifiers for calling something a life form. "Does it reproduce?" It doesn't make you special. Calm down.
 
Back