Steven Joel Akins / Penelope "Penny" Verity Oaken / u/Bardfinn / Penny Witchette / Finning Widget / MutabileSemper - "Incest is not unethical" - Troon Reddit powermod who orchestrates the posting of CP to subs they hate, pathological liar with a massive ego, domestic abuser and multiple felon

You probably have these already, but here are some more photos I found:

View attachment 2124015

View attachment 2124016

Edit - Pretty sure this is him:

View attachment 2124049

Last name is Dyen:

View attachment 2124067

View attachment 2124077
Nice. Formerly Nicholas G Dyen. Yale Class of 2012. Former staff assistant to republican Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski.
 
Nice. Formerly Nicholas G Dyen. Yale Class of 2012. Former staff assistant to republican Alaska senator Lisa Murkowski.
Why is Google indexing this site so fast?

google.png


This isn't the first time I've seen this happen.

Edit - Pre-transition picture:

nick.png

 
Last edited:
Nah, don't be obtuse. There are plenty of acceptable forms of evidence of this that don't involve literally presenting CP. I would happily accept an indictment of an involved person, an official statement from a law enforcement agency that it's going on and being investigated, an admission by a reddit employee that they've been made aware of it and are "taking action," a confession by a perpetrator, and so on.

I don't need to see video footage of Jeffrey Dahmer bludgeoning someone to death with a 10 pound dumbbell to accept it as true because other proof exists, like his confession, a coroner's report, forensic evidence connecting him to the crime, and expert testimony during his trial and subsequent conviction.
Hey, I haven't been able to find these and I'd really like to see them if you have links and it isn't too much trouble.
 
FYI, Bardfinn himself has admitted that what he describes as a "photo was of a juvenile human female, Tanner stage 1 (i.e. Toddler), nude, standing in a pool of water" being posted.

View attachment 2124242

What an absolute shit excuse. A photo of a fully nude child is sexual in the same way a photo of a fully nude grown woman is sexual. It is CP regardless of any activities the child is engaged in. I am more convinced than ever that this guy posted the CP.
 
I think troonism is this strange perfect storm of a bunch of weird shit coming together, and one element of that is troons naturally gravitating towards internet janny positions and controlling online narratives.
Troonism is very much about a desire for power and control: controlling the very language by which people describe others and by extension themselves. Making the well-intentioned constantly feel paranoid and guilty from potentially committing wrongthink. Abusive as hell, so right up Steve here's alley.
Besides, he's 46, which means that his parents are in the 70s/80s at the minimum if they're still alive and in (relatively) good health.
4-goddamn-6 and spending your life larping as a elite haxxor natsee hunter and honest wahman while literally living in your parents basement and terminally on Reddit. Is this not a cliche of a meme? It's the most pathetic combination possible.
Haven't read through the whole thread yet but here is an article on bardfinn via Glinner:

Twitter is starting to discuss this thread:
Since Nutmeg wrote the Glinner post it's definitely making it's way through the Twitter terfosphere. Good.
 
What an absolute shit excuse. A photo of a fully nude child is sexual in the same way a photo of a fully nude grown woman is sexual. It is CP regardless of any activities the child is engaged in. I am more convinced than ever that this guy posted the CP.
I can't say I agree with this. Otherwise nearly every family that had a child between the 60's and the 00's has a huge photo album containing dozens of "child porn" images of a naked toddler playing in a bath tub or sprinkler. It's a pretty obvious grey area.

Obviously people shouldn't be sharing or promoting toddler nudity on the internet or anywhere else, but calling this sort of thing "pornography" is a huge leap.

Edit to clarify that I am not defending Bardfinn, who is a worthless subhuman slime creature.
 
I can't say I agree with this. Otherwise nearly every family that had a child between the 60's and the 00's has a huge photo album containing dozens of "child porn" images of a naked toddler playing in a bath tub or sprinkler. It's a pretty obvious grey area.

Obviously people shouldn't be sharing or promoting toddler nudity on the internet or anywhere else, but calling this sort of thing "pornography" is a huge leap.
The context is important, of course, but I think there is a clear, defined difference between a cherished photo album and sharing a picture of a nude child on the internet. I don't know what CP is supposed to be if it's not sharing nude photos of children on the internet.

But I feel like you guys are forgetting that pedos are incredible creeps and would just as likely jerk it to a family photo album as they would internet CP.
 
Why this thread is all about some cp posting shenanigans, that I'd say are fickle at best, when ignoring something much more important:

Bradfinn is actually hilarious! He is so full of himself, triest waaaay to hard to sound smart, uses some cringe wording like "to a smart man a nod is as good as handshake" and overall is so overzealous with his mission of hunting nazis.

Recently he posted some modest calculation that it would cost reddit 100 thousand dollars a year to run nazi hunting center with similar capabilities of to those of his unpaid labour. Or how he list his amazing life achivments with those strong points like "calling out a CEO of Intel in reddit comment". Really, If you I'd go through his posting it is never-ending stream of hilarity. And when you realize he is unemployed troll, a wife-beater and petty criminal it is only funnier.

Too bad you can't search on reddit for shit and all material and screen regarding him dissapear really quickly. But I fucking wish I could share some of his "fines achivments" that he himself describes.
 
The context is important, of course, but I think there is a clear, defined difference between a cherished photo album and sharing a picture of a nude child on the internet. I don't know what CP is supposed to be if it's not sharing nude photos of children on the internet.
Generally I agree with you, and at the risk of getting into an off-topic conversation, the unfortunate reality is that even completely innocent pictures CAN serve as spank-bank fodder for the depraved. Does a photo become child pornography when it's shared between perverts even though it was originally innocent? I don't know.

The important thing in this case is that it doesn't matter if what they're posting is or isn't strictly CP, because Reddit's umbrella for such things is extremely broad. I could post a photo of myself naked in a bathtub to a subreddit and I'd get immediately banned for it.
 
Generally I agree with you, and at the risk of getting into an off-topic conversation, the unfortunate reality is that even completely innocent pictures CAN serve as spank-bank fodder for the depraved. Does a photo become child pornography when it's shared between perverts even though it was originally innocent? I don't know.

The important thing in this case is that it doesn't matter if what they're posting is or isn't strictly CP, because Reddit's umbrella for such things is extremely broad. I could post a photo of myself naked in a bathtub to a subreddit and I'd get immediately banned for it.
Look dude, it's not normal whatsoever to see someone else's naked child just like it's not normal to see someone else's naked wife. Family photos are just that, cherished family memories. That's the only point I'm making.

Anyway, you're right, this is off-topic. I just thought Steve's excuse was really fucking bad and wanted to comment on it.
 
FYI, Bardfinn himself has admitted that what he describes as a "photo was of a juvenile human female, Tanner stage 1 (i.e. Toddler), nude, standing in a pool of water" being posted.

View attachment 2124242

LOL. It sounds like he chose to post that picture specifically because he thinks he might be able to worm his way out of trouble if he was caught with it on his computer. "The photo is not sexual or sexualized, officers! It's totally not cheese pizza!"
 
FYI, Bardfinn himself has admitted that what he describes as a "photo was of a juvenile human female, Tanner stage 1 (i.e. Toddler), nude, standing in a pool of water" being posted.

View attachment 2124242

@Abyssal Bulwark you should add this to the OP in case anyone else questions the fact that CP gets posted on subs that get brigaded. Plus his sperging about whether or not pictures of naked kids break reddit's rules is funny,
 
Back