Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

According to who?
Common sense, learned experience, too many historical and public figure examples to recount here, and well, you.
Spelling and grammar on a shit posting thread has nothing to do with intelligence. Some of the most intelligent people are scatter brains lost in their thoughts, with messy desks, and typos. Your argument fails as a matter of logic and reason.
When one is a regular reader and writer one picks up habits. It's like playing the piano. A concert pianist will still play "chopsticks" correctly, its just the way their hands work after a while. I don't expect everyone to have perfect spelling and grammar. Just the people who claim to be scholars, and writers who have achieved perfection.
You think you're a good person and quite frankly, when measured against the morality of The Hebrew Bible, you're no
Are you telling me what I think? Please tell me you're not telling me what I think.
In any case why should I be measured against your arbitrary metric?
I don't recall my claim that I am a good person. Please tell me more about what I think.
 
@TamarYaelBatYah So, at your advice I was reading some early posts in the thread (pirate LARP was fun, do it again). There was a lot of talk about BDSM so, at risk of entering @Baby Yoda and @Cup Noodle 's territory I would like to get your opinion on this piece of text:
The term "sadist" in popular usage describes one who obtains pleasure from indiscriminate brutality. Actually, though, a true sadist is selective. He carefully chooses from the vast reserve of appropriate victims, and takes great delight in giving those who thrive on misery the fulfillment of their desires. The "well-adjusted" sadist is epicurean in selecting those on whom his energies will be well-spent! If a person is healthy enough to admit he is a masochist and enjoys being enslaved and whipped, the real sadist is glad to oblige!
Aside from the foregoing exceptions, we would not intentionally hurt others by violating their sexual rights.
If all parties involved are mature adults who willingly take full responsibility for their actions and voluntarily engage in a given form of sexual expression - even if it is generally considered taboo - then there is no reason for them to repress their sexual inclinations.
 
because anyone claiming to be morally perfect is either delusional or completely corrupt, and morally bankrupt.
According to who?

I make fun of people who pretend to be intellectually superior to the people around them who then proceed to regularly make stupid spelling and grammatical errors, logical mistakes, failures in reading comprehension, and generally show themselves to be living examples of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Spelling and grammar on a shit posting thread has nothing to do with intelligence. Some of the most intelligent people are scatter brains lost in their thoughts, with messy desks, and typos. Your argument fails as a matter of logic and reason.

"Failures in reading comprehension" and "Dunning-Kruger effect" is your subjective opinion, not factual evidence.

. I admit that I make mistakes. I admit my pals make mistakes. Sometimes I tell them about it because it it bugs me. I'm kinda known for it in private actually.
You think you're a good person and quite frankly, when measured against the morality of The Hebrew Bible, you're not.

Good people don't socially abuse others under anonymous profiles on websites dedicated to making societal Scapegoats. That's called narcissistic abuse.
I'm still just hanging on fi6t that court dismissal. @TamarYaelBatYah if your shit motions get shaped down, can you please go away?
No, after this suit, I'm filing an Appropriation suit against Joshua Moon for using my name, photo and likeness without my permission for 2017 to whatever year I feel like doing it.

Oh, pot, meet kettle.
Back to square one. The Christian accuses me of sin.

And what sin would that be?

Common sense, learned experience, too many historical and public figure examples to recount here, and well, you.
There's no such thing as "common sense". Cultural norms vary over time and place. "Common sense" is a term that was invented as a way for people go impose their worldview on others.

You say historical figures, but fail to name any.

Public figures are not a source of Truth


@TamarYaelBatYah So, at your advice I was reading some early posts in the thread (pirate LARP was fun, do it again). There was a lot of talk about BDSM so, at risk of entering @Baby Yoda and @Cup Noodle 's territory I would like to get your opinion on this piece of text:
I separate the concept of BDSM and masochism. One can engage in BDSM without also being a sadist.
What proves it is that my parents are not Jewish, neither by ancestry nor by religion. This thread has nothing to do with me being a Goy (you know that's proper singular form, right?)

I do not believe DNA science is always accurate, nor has the scientific community even finished mapping out all DNA. Also, the DNA of all of Israelite tribes is not all known and mapped out. So I don't believe DNA alone is enough.

To be honest, you're not as evil as many of the others, from my POV. I actually think a few of you that have appeared and interacted on the thread are not Goyim.

I think a few of you on this thread are not Goyim, but actually might be a Ger. So I'm not as harsh to those that I think might be Ger/Lost Sheep.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I separate the concept of BDSM and masochism. One can engage in BDSM without also being a sadist.
It means "Bondage, Discipline \ Dominance, Sadism, Masochism" or "Bondage, Discipline \ Dominance, Sadomasochism" so it's an integral part. If you're not into some of those you subtract corresponding letters.
I do not believe DNA science is always accurate, nor has the scientific community even finished mapping out all DNA.
I think DNA was fully sequenced?
Or you mean ambiguous role of non-coding DNA?
Also, the DNA of all of Israelite tribes is not all known and mapped out. So I don't believe DNA alone is enough.
As I said before the two of us probably have similar percent of Jewish DNA (one grandparent of Jewish descent).
To be honest, you're not as evil as many of the others, from my POV. I actually think a few of you that have appeared and interacted on the thread are not Goyim.
Thanks, I guess :)
I think a few of you on this thread are not Goyim, but actually might be a Ger. So I'm not as harsh to those that I think might be Ger/Lost Sheep.
You were talking directly to me when saying "you're evil". and telling me what I deserve so I guess my assumption it was directed at me isn't baseless.
I don't consider myself a "lost sheep" - my convictions are as strong as yours.
 
Failures in reading comprehension" and "Dunning-Kruger effect" is your subjective opinion, not factual evidence.
Speaking of, I already answered every thing you quoted me on, so I'll just go ahead and quote myself. Try and read properly this time, you fucking moron.
Common sense, learned experience, too many historical and public figure examples to recount here, and well, you.

When one is a regular reader and writer one picks up habits. It's like playing the piano. A concert pianist will still play "chopsticks" correctly, its just the way their hands work after a while. I don't expect everyone to have perfect spelling and grammar. Just the people who claim to be scholars, and

Are you telling me what I think? Please tell me you're not telling me what I think.
In any case why should I be measured against your arbitrary metric?
I don't recall my claim that I am a good person. Please tell me more about what I think.
 
It means "Bondage, Discipline \ Dominance, Sadism, Masochism" or "Bondage, Discipline \ Dominance, Sadomasochism" so it's an integral part. If you're not into some of those you subtract corresponding letters.

I respectfully disagree. Whenever anyone acknowledges they are into "SM" or "BDSM" , they are not necessarily identifying or aligning themselves with all of the core concepts (after all, switches who feel equally comfortable in both the dom and sub position are not the norm). I have never heard someone use the phrase "I am into BM" to denote being into bondage in a masochistic position (this is usually called being a rope bunny).
That person is into BDSM as a general category, their role is then a specific aspect of it. There are many emotional gateways that lead to BDSM in interpersonal relationships (sexual or otherwise) and some can indeed be free of fx. sadism.
 
Last edited:
According to who?



Spelling and grammar on a shit posting thread has nothing to do with intelligence. Some of the most intelligent people are scatter brains lost in their thoughts, with messy desks, and typos. Your argument fails as a matter of logic and reason.

"Failures in reading comprehension" and "Dunning-Kruger effect" is your subjective opinion, not factual evidence.



You think you're a good person and quite frankly, when measured against the morality of The Hebrew Bible, you're not.

Good people don't socially abuse others under anonymous profiles on websites dedicated to making societal Scapegoats. That's called narcissistic abuse.

No, after this suit, I'm filing an Appropriation suit against Joshua Moon for using my name, photo and likeness without my permission for 2017 to whatever year I feel like doing it.



Back to square one. The Christian accuses me of sin.

And what sin would that be?



There's no such thing as "common sense". Cultural norms vary over time and place. "Common sense" is a term that was invented as a way for people go impose their worldview on others.

You say historical figures, but fail to name any.

Public figures are not a source of Truth




I separate the concept of BDSM and masochism. One can engage in BDSM without also being a sadist.


I do not believe DNA science is always accurate, nor has the scientific community even finished mapping out all DNA. Also, the DNA of all of Israelite tribes is not all known and mapped out. So I don't believe DNA alone is enough.

To be honest, you're not as evil as many of the others, from my POV. I actually think a few of you that have appeared and interacted on the thread are not Goyim.

I think a few of you on this thread are not Goyim, but actually might be a Ger. So I'm not as harsh to those that I think might be Ger/Lost Sheep.
shut up you fat jew, it's not anus pics so I literally don't give a shit
 
The Talmud is a sexist book. It should be illegal. It's no longer socially acceptable to print books saying black people are genetically inferior descendants of baboons because of their skull shape and are the cursed line of Ham, but somehow it's still socially acceptable to print and publish outlandish, downright sexist material against women.

Who is going to be the MLK for women?
Certainly not someone who's okay with marital rape.
I'm pretty sure you're just using sexism as an excuse to not read the Talmud.
 
That person is into BDSM as a general category, their role is then a specific aspect of it. There are many emotional gateways that lead to BDSM in interpersonal relationships (sexual or otherwise) and some can indeed be free of fx. sadism.
Thanks for clarifying. My understanding was that some aspect of sadism and masochism are always there - that it can't work without that aspect of domination and submission, be it physical or psychological. Actually seen people using S\M to describe their kink, without BD part.
 
Certainly not someone who's okay with marital rape.
I'm pretty sure you're just using sexism as an excuse to not read the Talmud.
MLK for women would want them to be free to do anything they want. Melinda only wants women to be free to do what Melinda wants. Mel's way is only way. Too bad for you if you aren't interested in babies, lactation, servicing a man, or want to have a career of any type.
MLK for women would celebrate both mothers and non mothers. She'd have room for sisters and aunts. And friends. All the things melinda doesn't have or understand.
 
MLK for women would want them to be free to do anything they want. Melinda only wants women to be free to do what Melinda wants. Mel's way is only way. Too bad for you if you aren't interested in babies, lactation, servicing a man, or want to have a career of any type.
MLK for women would celebrate both mothers and non mothers. She'd have room for sisters and aunts. And friends. All the things melinda doesn't have or understand.
Oh yeah, she thinks it's misogynist for women to have jobs outside the house.
Clearly Melinda neither knows nor cares what feminism is about, but wants people to think otherwise.
 
I know that you won't stop even if you lose because you literally have nothing better to do, but can you fuck off from this thread at least?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Toasty
Existing. But also you lied when you said that I had said "men's sex drives never fail to amaze me". That's one of them Ten Commandments, you know.
It only counts when other people lie, not her. She has a special dispensation, because perfect people are allowed to lie and not follow the commandments when they feel like it, depending on the situation.
 
Back