Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Toasty]

That's not how that works. That's not how any of that works. You dumb twàt.

Didn't she already try and fail on that one anyway?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That's not how that works. That's not how any of that works. You dumb twàt.

Marshall right to laugh at this woman's asperations to be a lawyer. Let that sink in. Even Marshall knows that his woman is an idiot. How do you end up with Marshall being the intelligent one in the relationship?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

How do you end up with Marshall being the intelligent one in the relationship?

I'd say more self-aware, not more intelligent. And he's Chaotic Evil, avoiding the law. Melinda is Lawful Evil, trying to bend the law to her needs.

 

[Toasty]

Marshall right to laugh at this woman's asperations to be a lawyer. Let that sink in. Even Marshall knows that his woman is an idiot. How do you end up with Marshall being the intelligent one in the relationship?

Well, she IS possibly the dumbest woman alive, so...

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'd say more self-aware, not more intelligent. And he's Chaotic Evil, avoiding the law. Melinda is Lawful Evil, trying to bend the law to her needs.

I've taken many alignment tests and political tests (My groups would do this for the new guy to see which alignment was best for their characters). I'm more Lawful Evil than Melinda (Also Center Left/ Authoritarian Left, Autocracy is one of the better ways to rule a nation). She's more Lawful Stupid than anything, or Neutral and just goes what's best for herself. Could also argue that she's Neutral Evil.

 

[super thug]

who's going to stop me?

I love hearing someone else say this for once. It's such a fun thing to say, isn't it?

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

I've taken many alignment tests and political tests (My groups would do this for the new guy to see which alignment was best for their characters). I'm more Lawful Evil than Melinda (Also Center Left/ Authoritarian Left, Autocracy is one of the better ways to rule a nation).

I'd put myself as Chaotic Neutral (I really appreciate randomness of the world and I follow my own code of conduct) and a centrist \ opportunist politically (go with what's the best for me and those I care about or if there is no good option - with what's less likely to come back to kick me in the ass later).

She's more Lawful Stupid than anything, or Neutral and just goes what's best for herself.

Alignment and INT\WIS stats are two different things. Her tendency to set rules and judge people by them and to use legal system to her advantage puts her on the Lawful side, for me at least. Not Lawful Neutral - because that's someone who simply loves the rules (Vhailor in PS:T is a great LN character). Not Lawful Good because there is no altruism in her actions. Lawful Evil is all that remains.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'd put myself as Chaotic Neutral (I really appreciate randomness of the world and I follow my own code of conduct) and a centrist \ opportunist politically (go with what's the best for me and those I care about or if there is no good option - with what's less likely to come back to kick me in the ass later).

Alignment and INT\WIS stats are two different things. Her tendency to set rules and judge people by them and to use legal system to her advantage puts her on the Lawful side, for me at least. Not Lawful Neutral - because that's someone who simply loves the rules (Vhailor in PS:T is a great LN character). Not Lawful Good because there is no altruism in her actions. Lawful Evil is all that remains.

Neutral Evil characters will use the law as well. Judicial systems aren't always lawful. A neutral evil character would use the law as a way to manipulate people into getting what they want. It's just another tool to them.

 

[Cup Noodle]

Oh yeah, she thinks it's misogynist for women to have jobs outside the house.
Clearly Melinda neither knows nor cares what feminism is about, but wants people to think otherwise.

The more I read about this woman the more I like. I plan on doing a deep dive on the thread but I haven't had the time yet.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Neutral Evil characters will use the law as well. Judicial systems aren't always lawful. A neutral evil character would use the law as a way to manipulate people into getting what they want. It's just another tool to them.

I would agree if it was only about the lawsuits. But it's not - she sets rules based on religion \ religious texts, internalizes them (that's when Lawful characteristics kick in - Neutral Evil would set those rules but not bound themselves by them) and then uses those rules to judge people.

The more I read about this woman the more I like.

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

The more I read about this woman the more I like. I plan on doing a deep dive on the thread but I haven't had the time yet.

But what about Pamela? Melinda isn't into polygamy.

I would agree if it was only about the lawsuits. But it's not - she sets rules based on religion \ religious texts, internalizes them (that's when Lawful characteristics kick in - Neutral Evil would set those rules but not bound themselves by them) and then uses those rules to judge people.

THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

She had to reinvent Judaism to suit her though. She doesn't follow a real religion. I should also mention that Neutral Evil can have gods and followers.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

She had to reinvent Judaism to suit her though.

Yes, and most likely out of internal need, not for utilitarian purpose as a Neutral Evil would.

She doesn't follow a real religion.

I think we both concluded there is no such thing

I should also mention that Neutral Evil can have gods and followers.

It's different in D&D because pretty much everybody in the world knows gods are real so worshiping a god aligned with your character can bring some actual benefits and favors.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Yes, and most likely out of internal need, not for utilitarian purpose as a Neutral Evil would.

I think we both concluded there is no such thing

It's different in D&D because pretty much everybody in the world knows gods are real so worshiping a god aligned with your character can bring some actual benefits and favors.

Neutral Evil always think their religion is the real religion and ride off the backs of Chaotic and Lawful people. They're the leeches of society.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Neutral Evil always think their religion is the real religion and ride off the backs of Chaotic and Lawful people. They're the leeches of society.

First similar situation that came to my mind: Unseeing Eye. Establishes his own religion for his personal purposes. Lawful Evil.
Neutral Evil are, indeed, leeches, ultimate pragmatists deprived of any morality, people looking for their own benefit above all else. Mel is a bit more complex in my opinion. Being here and talking to us gets her nothing, and yet she's here.

 

[Cup Noodle]

But what about Pamela? Melinda isn't into polygamy.

Father Abraham also had a concubine because his wife couldn't bare children. Hell his wife gave her to him. It gets more complicated but that's a good enough explanation for here. Pam is likely barren, so I will take her for a wife and Mel will be my concubine to bear me children. It all holds up with the old testament/torah. There was plenty of polygamy in the old testament and in history in general. When everyone is constantly at war the the ratio of men to women skews towards women. If a woman wanted to get married she had to be a prime example or be the second or third etc. wife.

 

[Baby Yoda]

@TamarYaelBatYah Have you ever watched a porn series with Max Hardcore called "Stop. My Ass is on Fire!" Would explain, but the name speaks for itself.

@Burmese Rice Farmer Good to have you back.

 

[Cup Noodle]

@TamarYaelBatYah Have you ever watched a porn series with Max Hardcore called "Stop. My Ass is on Fire!" Would explain, but the name speaks for itself.

@Burmese Rice Farmer Good to have you back.

If her ass is on fire you're doing something wrong. Getting a chick to love butt stuff is pretty easy if you can master the front hole stuff first.

 

[Crasson]

According to who?



Spelling and grammar on a shit posting thread has nothing to do with intelligence. Some of the most intelligent people are scatter brains lost in their thoughts, with messy desks, and typos. Your argument fails as a matter of logic and reason.

"Failures in reading comprehension" and "Dunning-Kruger effect" is your subjective opinion, not factual evidence.



You think you're a good person and quite frankly, when measured against the morality of The Hebrew Bible, you're not.

Good people don't socially abuse others under anonymous profiles on websites dedicated to making societal Scapegoats. That's called narcissistic abuse.

The OT also says that slavery is way cool, especially if you're not one of the tribe. Maybe it isn't the best measuring stick of morality out there.

 

[White Baby]

The OT also says that slavery is way cool, especially if you're not one of the tribe. Maybe it isn't the best measuring stick of morality out there.

From what @TamarYaelBatYah has said about our venerated African-American brethren, she would probably be into having slaves if it were legal.

 

[Toasty]

From what @TamarYaelBatYah has said about our venerated African-American brethren, she would probably be into having slaves if it were legal.

Forget black people, she's favorably mentioned indentured servitude for children to solve the money problems of the parents.