Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bob claims that his Chipman ancestors built the first tavern in America. Doesn't surprise me that the first thing his hairy forbears would do once their feet hit the shore would booze it up, presumably with some kind of overpriced Pilgrim Ale. I also did some research and discovered that Bob's ancestors were busybodies who bugged people by getting into their business. Let's face it: I don't think an era has ever gone by when a Chipman has walked into a room and there wasn't the sound of groaning. Bob's ancestors must've been as welcome as a corn blight.
Petty, small-minded oafs from the beginning, it seems. Oafishness seems to be the defining trait of the Chipman bloodline, and not a harmless, jolly oafishness, a malicious, vindictive oafishness.

Forgive me, I'm a bit in love with the term "oafishness", it's so perfectly suited to the Chipmans.
 
Bob seems more mad that he didn't have a dream high school experience than he seems traumatized by being bullied.

That's where I was trying to land.... but kept missing.

I was upset at what happened TO ME in school, but got over it - so school wasn't the greatest, big deal, you'll spend most of your life OUT of it.

Bob's upset at what DIDN'T happen, and CAN'T get over it because his life depends on it for value - I am a respected, big-brained, superior being! AND NO ONE CAN SEE IT BUT ME!!!!


Lord knows I don't have the patience, but I'm assuming the argument is that cancel culture isn't real because something something you just have the wrong ideas so it's okay to eject you from society. That's some audacity to claim that their own free speech is being hampered because governments aren't allowing them to shut down others' free speech. Hey morons, that's not how it works. Funny how they're all for free speech until they're in power (oh wait no it isn't).

Where the cancelists make the big mistake is that they believe their opinions are truths and "common sense" whereas opposing opinions are either manifestations of mental illness and/or the "natural" hatefulness of lesser people who have not been enlightened yet or have, but reject it due to jealousy that they'll never be as smart as their betters, like Bob.

You cannot convince them they aren't being fair by censoring everyone who expresses different opinions because to them, that's as insane as saying you can't punish a child for playing with matches: bad/dangerous behavior must be disciplined out of society, and having wrong opinions is just the same as playing with fire - someone's gonna get hurt if we let it continue.

To them, making it impossible for holders of wrong opinions to express them is the same as taking away that book of matches from the child: They are merely preventing the disaster that will surely happen if wrong behavior is left unchecked.

It's a fundamental misunderstanding of what free speech is - To them, free speech is the right to pledge loyalty to that which has already been declared correct, not literally whatever is on your mind. Much less question the ruling dogma. To a leftist, free speech/ expression is "you can have a favorite flavor of chocolate" not "you can have a favorite flavor of ice cream" because "we all know" (right side of history) that chocolate is the best and only a dunce would disagree.

Censorship to them is a VIRTUE because in their world view, every voice silenced makes us safer and happier in the long run.
 
0967.png
As if the Democrats could define "systemic"; as if the Democrats could define one single buzzword they use.
And Bobby, please mind your apostrophes before you rag on other people's misspellings.

"Gatez and Greenwald" gives you GG. Bobby is in no position to criticize people for backing the wrong horse consider he had stood up for Devin Faraci:
gg.png

Gun expert:
09=9=.png

More on that Falcon character called John Walker. Despite him being a Nazi, Bobby feels a pang of sympathy towards him.
78067.png

0967.png

Angel:
658658.png
 
I think it's much easier to make an argument that Dems are anti-children.

Dems are also in favor of castrating, sterilizing, and mutilating children to make the troon lobby feel good about itself. The most pro-child thing you can say about the modern Dem party is how many of them seem keen to fuck them.

There's also the fact that the right to tear them out of their mothers' wombs and throw them in a dumpster is basically a sacrament, but that's another can of worms. And regardless of your feelings on it, I think we can agree that it's ridiculous for Bob to be so adamant about it, considering that the predicament of a pregnant girlfriend is one he'll never have to deal with.

That said, for once we have a conservative SCOTUS so we won't get fucked over like we did last time
:optimistic::optimistic::optimistic:
 
The one thing I don't understand about the Gay Community is why they a line themselves with the Troons. I mean the LGB part of the Alphabet use to always be able to fall back on we were born this way hard to claim that when it take drugs and surgeries to be "born that way".

Not all of them do. A lot, and I mean a lot of the feminists who've been exiled to the outer darkness for being "TERFs" are staunch lesbians. It's hard to tell how much of the unity among the sexual weirdo contingent is genuine and how much is a media creation.
 
I think we can agree that it's ridiculous for Bob to be so adamant about it,
I think that a lot, not just about Bob and abortion, but almost everyone on the Breadless-Left and a good chunk of people on the Sperg-Right too. People who are just so fucking angry about things that are completely disconnected from their lives as a whole.

The status quo is that abortion exists, right to choose, all that. And yet people who are pro-abortion, who have already won the debate, are still really REALLY mad about... Something. Jesus dude, if you ever managed to trick some poor bitch into accepted your low motility spunk she would have the right to scrape the double-chinned fetus out and throw it in the fucking trash. So how can you still be mad about this issue? Anyone who is violently in favor of the status quo is unbalanced, and it indicates a deeper personal problem.

Whatever reason Motion Picture Roberto has for loving abortion, it's not just because he thinks it's correct. It's 100% something weird and dark in his history; maybe in college he convinced a girl to have an abortion for the sake of her career, and that same chick is now a griefwracked, lonely, cat lady. Who knows? But something is there.
 
Whatever reason Motion Picture Roberto has for loving abortion, it's not just because he thinks it's correct. It's 100% something weird and dark in his history; maybe in college he convinced a girl to have an abortion for the sake of her career, and that same chick is now a griefwracked, lonely, cat lady. Who knows? But something is there.
Nah I think it is just something his Overladies (Lindsaaaaaay!!!!!!) on social media tell him.
 
Nah I think it is just something his Overladies (Lindsaaaaaay!!!!!!) on social media tell him.

It's a combination of him associating the anti-abortion position with religious whackos and his desperate craving for approval from feminists. "See! I stand up for your right to choose! So we can date or something, maybe?" Both are pathetic impulses.
 
The one thing I don't understand about the Gay Community is why they a line themselves with the Troons. I mean the LGB part of the Alphabet use to always be able to fall back on we were born this way hard to claim that when it take drugs and surgeries to be "born that way".
As a friend once said to me (and he's bi so he has some experience with the LGBT "community").... Once any group hits 5% loudmouth crazies, they can take over as the face of the group without any real resistance.

Not all of them do. A lot, and I mean a lot of the feminists who've been exiled to the outer darkness for being "TERFs" are staunch lesbians. It's hard to tell how much of the unity among the sexual weirdo contingent is genuine and how much is a media creation.
I do love the idea that they're selling LGBT "unity" as a thing when part of the T is guys in dresses using their "oppressed" status to pressure the women in the L into sucking their feminine penises. But ask them to talk about unity within a married hetero couple and all you'll hear is narratives of abuse.
 
I fear most are just going to blame society for not accepting them instead of the doctors and pharmaceutical companies that lied to them and prevented them from getting the help they really needed.
The whole thing just reminds me of recovered memory therapy on a larger scale. I'd be unsurpised if in 10 years the pendulum swings back towards ”therapy, not hormones, is the best treatment for gender dysphoria” and if in 20 years troons are a historical footnote.

That said, I'd also be unsurprised if the same supporters of LGBT ideology that got us gay ”marriage” and troonery manage to push their luck further. Ten years ago, ”if you say two men can marry, why not three men and a dog?” was a right-wing argument and now I see people pushing for enshrining polyamory in law and trying to justify paedophilia. I honestly don't know what will end up happening.
Whatever reason Motion Picture Roberto has for loving abortion, it's not just because he thinks it's correct. It's 100% something weird and dark in his history; maybe in college he convinced a girl to have an abortion for the sake of her career, and that same chick is now a griefwracked, lonely, cat lady. Who knows? But something is there.
It boils down to:
• Women Blob wants to fuck support abortion
• Those women often date progressives
• If Blob becomes a well-known progressive they will date him

It's basically an autist's understanding of human relationships.
 
That said, I'd also be unsurprised if the same supporters of LGBT ideology that got us gay ”marriage” and troonery manage to push their luck further. Ten years ago, ”if you say two men can marry, why not three men and a dog?” was a right-wing argument and now I see people pushing for enshrining polyamory in law and trying to justify paedophilia. I honestly don't know what will end up happening.
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death."

Read the whole poem. It doesn't end well.
 
"When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins"
It was written in 1919? How come Kipling predicted exactly what happens 100 years later?
The Bible says there is nothing new under the sun, and that nothing we suffer is new to humans. We look at modern vices and are appalled, but when we dig through history (actual history, not the Woke version), we discover that our modern vices are simply older vices with shinier wrapping and better advertising. Kipling understood that history echoes a hundred years ago. We have destroyed our own history, so we are shocked and wonder how this could happen.

Apropos of nothing, Bob is fat and will die a lonely virgin while wishing he had consoomed just one more product.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back