- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
This makes sense, legally. In my state, there's a difference between a tenant and a boarder/lodger, with regards to shared common spaces, utilities and privacy. It's legally easier here to evict a boarder, probably because things escalate quickly when you're cheek-to-jaw with someone.1. RE: Kevin and the ranchers. I looked into some light financial reports I could find earlier in the thread and Kevin/Jen are not considered employees of the ranch from what I can tell. The amount of workers the ranch has listed is 5, with 7 perma-residents meaning Kevin and Jen are strictly renters which is why those two don't do shit and while that may cause some resentment its also the agreed upon situation. I will add here I think there may be some legal issues with renting 1/3 of the bed for $1000 as there are rules to what someone can rent and call a home, as well as standards the landlord must meet be
From what I can find, Colorado doesn't have that distinction (and some others) in their tenant law, probably because of wide-open spaces and rugged individualism. There's DV tenant protection. Related: being "in a relationship" is probably useful for waiving some of those rights; of course you'd expect to share a bed with your "wife-to-be."
Don't troons and their allies usually feel some kind of a way about landlords, and people with hereditary wealth who choose not to work? One day the labor class might cast off their chains, seize the Transformers and