🐱 Rampant Voter fraud: Pennsylvania man sentenced to 5-year probation after voting in name of dead mother - Oh

CatParty


A Pennsylvania man has been sentenced to five years of probation after pleading guilty to casting a vote in the name of his deceased mother in an effort to reelect then-President Donald Trump, according to court records and Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer's office.
Bruce Bartman, 70, received the sentence Friday after entering a guilty plea to two counts of perjury and one count of unlawful voting. Bartman will also lose his right to vote for four years, pursuant to Pennsylvania statute, the district attorney's office said in a news release.
Voter records show that Bartman used Pennsylvania's online voter-registration portal to register both his late mother, Elizabeth Bartman, and his deceased mother-in-law, Elizabeth Weihman, who died in 2019 -- illegally registering both as Republican voters, the district attorney's office said.

Bartman then requested, filled out and sent in the absentee ballot for his deceased mother for the 2020 general election. Bartman's attorney, Samuel Stretton, told CNN that his client regrets the decision.


Stretton said Bartman had explained to the court that because of the coronavirus pandemic, he had been isolated at home and was misled by "propaganda and statements" that were made about voter fraud.

"This was his way of misguided political dissent," Stretton said. "He accepts the responsibility."
Trump repeatedly sought to sow doubt about the integrity of the general election and even falsely claimed victory over Joe Biden despite there being no evidence of widespread voter fraud in any US state.

Republican state lawmakers across the country have echoed Trump's voting conspiracy theories and, in some cases, advanced new election bills that disproportionately affect Democratic voters.
A tally by the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University found that 361 bills with provisions that restrict voting had been introduced in 47 states as of March 24. In the last month, the effort to restrict voting has intensified as state legislatures begin to head into the final months of their sessions.

"Our Office has done what it can to ensure our elections are both secure and accessible but the next fight is in Harrisburg. To those reviewing voter systems, I say, 'Remove failed systems, not ballot boxes,' " Stollsteimer, a Democrat, said Friday, noting that this was the only known case of a dead person voting in the county.
"Rather than earning national attention for efforts to restrict accessibility to voting, address the breakdown in the online voter registration systems that this defendant exploited to vote for a deceased relative."
 
None of those are particularly challenging hurdles, especially if it's not a single person, but an organized effort. Multiple registrations are perfectly legal in states, and it happens all the time by accident. All you'd need to do is blanket register people and then see who registers an additional time. Get Out The Vote efforts are constantly busing people all around polling stations for legitimate reasons, so it's not like popping the same crowd into a couple of different places would be impossible. The only potential hard stop would be time in line, but that's going to vary a tremendous amount depending on which polling place you go to and what time of day you do it. Last time I voted I was in and out in 5 minutes.
And yes, even 5 votes per peron can have a tremendous effect on an election. Plenty of house and senate races have margins of less than 10 votes, and Bush only won Florida by like 500 votes.
Again, i'm not saying that election fraud is widespread, or even definitively happens, but saying we should only improve an insecure system when we have 100% incontrovertible proof that it's been subverted is like saying you should only start locking your doors after you've been robbed. The things we need to implement it already exist. Multiple states have already tried and tested it. It's not a huge money sink, there's not some massive drop in voters, and it's not hard to implement. It's really weird to me that states that have extensive registration procedures for guns like California and New York act like it's impossible or immoral for them to put up a system that's implemented in places like Mississippi and Washington.
Bush initially won by 1700+ votes then a machine recount brought it down to 300 then Gore and the Florida State Supreme Court and other DNC agents started violating Florida State election laws to attempt to manually recount until they won(totally no DNC assets caught fucking with ballots to try to get the perforations to break in 2000 btw). Sounds oddly familiar.

(I hate Bush btw but the dude won because Gore was a dogshit candidate)

The SCOTUS shit is irrelevant to the 2000 election as the electors were certified and sent before the cases were heard. All that SCOTUS shit did was open doors down the line.

I really do not know why anyone interacts with Shilk at this point. They rant until they are inevitably proven wrong then they just hide in TES for a few days or a week until they feel like they are winning again.

Gore lost. The DNC tried to steal, refined their process and moved on from there.

The same DNC who tried to block the certification of Trump's electors in 2016 which was seen as heroic by the media btw.

Oh and just to indulge the faggot the reason there was no call for audits in 2016 was because the DNC did not want people looking into the votes at that level when they had the MSM to lie for them about Russian Collusion and hackers(what was that recently about Seth Rich's murder probably being politically motivated?).
 
There was plenty of electoral fraud in the 2020 election, why the fuck do you think the Democrats are so dead-set against voter ID? They know they're going to at least lose the house in the midterms and possibly the senate. They want to limit the damage as much as possible by fraudulent means, if not prevent the damage altogether. Also, guys, stop responding to the paypiggies when they come here to troll and stir shit up. Put Hollywood Hogan and the rest of them on ignore and go about your day, for fuck's sake.
 
You're correct, that's why they focus so much on the "retards that cast votes on behalf of dead relative", it's purely a distraction from the much larger shit at work.
It seems like the thing they do with conspiracy theories. Now, when people talk about voter fraud, people that don't give a shit will think of the CNN report that orangeman voters did it on a small scale when the Deep State reaction shows it's about the exact opposite.
 
Lol at using Project Veritas. They were busted making up videos. Any idiot could call up and pretend to be someone and say you saw something. I know you have crippling autism and thus are more gullible, but come on man. Kiwi Farmers of all things should know how easy it is to make shit up

Besides, I thought you claimed to not be a right-winger?
 
Do you have proof?
I know this is some heavily autistic way of trying to GOTCHA me, so I will turn it around: Prove they never made anything up since you claim you can prove a negative.

But anyway: https://www.theverge.com/interface/2019/6/27/18760463/project-veritas-youtube-sting-james-okeefe

There's tons more if you google it

I know you have severe autism, but you frequent Kiwi Farms. You should know how easy it is for them to have someone call in and claim to be someone and claim to have seen something. Again, I know your debilitating autism makes you get scammed and conned easily, but you frequent this site enough to know better. I suspect it's said autism which makes you whiteknight Trump so hard.

Besides, I thought you claimed to not be a fan of the GOP? You sure do a lot of whiteknighting of them to not like them
 
This is just an article alleging fraud, anybody could just say they committed fraud.

Also lol using the Verge. They were caught making a bunch of errors in a PC building video, removed the video and the started copyright striking mirrors and videos criticizing their shitty PC build.
At least I am not gullible enough to believe a totes secret anonymous caller video from a source known to make shit up, all in defense of a career conman :story:

And you're even too much of a pussy to admit you are a fan of the GOP
 
At least I am not gullible enough to believe a totes secret anonymous caller video from a source known to make shit up, all in defense of a career conman :story:
But you are gullible enough to trust a source that deletes their own blunders to save face.
And you're even too much of a pussy to admit you are a fan of the GOP
It's almost like believing there was fraud and disliking a political party are not mutually contradictory statements.
 
But you are gullible enough to trust a source that deletes their own blunders to save face.
Nah, I believe something when there's evidence of it. You believe it if the career conman you simp for says it, even with zero evidence. I suspect your gullibility is due to your severe autism, but I could be mistaken
It's almost like believing there was fraud and disliking a political party are not mutually contradictory statements.
Uh huh. For someone who doesn't like the GOP, you sure do a lot of defending of them and their talking points.
 
After posting an article with no evidence from an unreliable source.
I just woke up, i'm tired, but it looks like the article didn't say they faked the video in that article? It said it was deceptively edited, but that's different than making it up out of whole cloth. Or am I too tired and misreading?

Granted I agree that an anonymous call could be from anyone, but i'm not seeing the claim that veritas made a fake video in that video. Ironically, the article seemed to demand that veritas hide the identity of one of the 'participants' more.
 
hahahaha this actually made national news. old man's a lying sack of shit. that or he's dumb as hell.

...he had been isolated at home and was misled by "propaganda and statements" that were made about voter fraud.

"This was his way of misguided political dissent," Stretton said. "He accepts the responsibility."

lol fuck this dude. he's got no choice but to take responsibility because he fucking got caught.

additionally, what a great way to honor a deceased parent - by committing voter fraud in their name. great dude.

keep up the great work at riling up the resident tards @Hollywood Hulk Hogan!

delco represent niggas
 
I know this is some heavily autistic way of trying to GOTCHA me, so I will turn it around: Prove they never made anything up since you claim you can prove a negative.

But anyway: https://www.theverge.com/interface/2019/6/27/18760463/project-veritas-youtube-sting-james-okeefe

There's tons more if you google it

I know you have severe autism, but you frequent Kiwi Farms. You should know how easy it is for them to have someone call in and claim to be someone and claim to have seen something. Again, I know your debilitating autism makes you get scammed and conned easily, but you frequent this site enough to know better. I suspect it's said autism which makes you whiteknight Trump so hard.

Besides, I thought you claimed to not be a fan of the GOP? You sure do a lot of whiteknighting of them to not like them

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. An article by the verge is automatically disqualified for being a partisan mouth piece.

Still waiting.
 
Back