🐱 Rampant Voter fraud: Pennsylvania man sentenced to 5-year probation after voting in name of dead mother - Oh

CatParty


A Pennsylvania man has been sentenced to five years of probation after pleading guilty to casting a vote in the name of his deceased mother in an effort to reelect then-President Donald Trump, according to court records and Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer's office.
Bruce Bartman, 70, received the sentence Friday after entering a guilty plea to two counts of perjury and one count of unlawful voting. Bartman will also lose his right to vote for four years, pursuant to Pennsylvania statute, the district attorney's office said in a news release.
Voter records show that Bartman used Pennsylvania's online voter-registration portal to register both his late mother, Elizabeth Bartman, and his deceased mother-in-law, Elizabeth Weihman, who died in 2019 -- illegally registering both as Republican voters, the district attorney's office said.

Bartman then requested, filled out and sent in the absentee ballot for his deceased mother for the 2020 general election. Bartman's attorney, Samuel Stretton, told CNN that his client regrets the decision.


Stretton said Bartman had explained to the court that because of the coronavirus pandemic, he had been isolated at home and was misled by "propaganda and statements" that were made about voter fraud.

"This was his way of misguided political dissent," Stretton said. "He accepts the responsibility."
Trump repeatedly sought to sow doubt about the integrity of the general election and even falsely claimed victory over Joe Biden despite there being no evidence of widespread voter fraud in any US state.

Republican state lawmakers across the country have echoed Trump's voting conspiracy theories and, in some cases, advanced new election bills that disproportionately affect Democratic voters.
A tally by the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice at New York University found that 361 bills with provisions that restrict voting had been introduced in 47 states as of March 24. In the last month, the effort to restrict voting has intensified as state legislatures begin to head into the final months of their sessions.

"Our Office has done what it can to ensure our elections are both secure and accessible but the next fight is in Harrisburg. To those reviewing voter systems, I say, 'Remove failed systems, not ballot boxes,' " Stollsteimer, a Democrat, said Friday, noting that this was the only known case of a dead person voting in the county.
"Rather than earning national attention for efforts to restrict accessibility to voting, address the breakdown in the online voter registration systems that this defendant exploited to vote for a deceased relative."
 
You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. An article by the verge is automatically disqualified for being a partisan mouth piece.

Still waiting.

There's another 2. Basically, believing Project Veritas is like believing Michael Moore videos (both edit the shit out of their videos to make it look worse than it is, which kills their credibility). Then again, you guys legitimately believe a totally real anonymous "postal employee" who is telling how he witnessed the greatest scandal in American politics history, and stays anonymous despite the fact that whistleblower laws exist. And he goes to Project Veritas and not a bigger, more reliably media outlet.

You guys really do prove that autists are more gullible than us normies.
 
>HHH backs up claims with evidence
>random literal actual retard too upset to negrate and move on mass quotes HHH and posts gay ratings images

it seems to me like these people don't argue in good faith. shocking.

The claim:
Lol at using Project Veritas. They were busted making up videos. Any idiot could call up and pretend to be someone and say you saw something. I know you have crippling autism and thus are more gullible, but come on man. Kiwi Farmers of all things should know how easy it is to make shit up

The evidence:

NPR: O'Keefe 'Inappropriately Edited' Video; Exec's Words Still 'Egregious'​


The reason O'Keefe is an effective cunt is because all the videos are "real", just edited in a way that's usually deceptive. I haven't heard of him making up something from whole cloth. How these people keep falling for this shit is beyond me. Just don't banter with people you don't know, lol.
 
The reason O'Keefe is an effective cunt is because all the videos are "real", just edited in a way that's usually deceptive. I haven't heard of him making up something from whole cloth. How these people keep falling for this shit is beyond me. Just don't banter with people you don't know, lol.
You really think that editing videos is not making them not real? Splicing and editing interviews to make them say different things is indeed faking videos.
 
You really think that editing videos is not making them not real? Splicing and editing interviews to make them say different things is indeed faking videos.
Depriving something of context isn't the same as completely making it up, which is what makes it more dangerous, IMO. It becomes impossible to tell what was a thing that was sincerely said and what was editing bullshit, and trying to dismiss it all as being a fabrication makes it easy for people to latch on to the nuggets of truth and dig in to their position. Like i said, he's an effective cunt.
 
Depriving something of context isn't the same as completely making it up, which is what makes it more dangerous, IMO. It becomes impossible to tell what was a thing that was sincerely said and what was editing bullshit, and trying to dismiss it all as being a fabrication makes it easy for people to latch on to the nuggets of truth and dig in to their position. Like i said, he's an effective cunt.
Nah, splicing videos to make it say different things is indeed faking videos. It's no different than what Michael Moore used to do
 
ITT Trumpers are being forced to look into a mirror and say "no that's not me. "
 
Back