Oh wow, our head Branch Covidian now claims that we know that vaccinated people are not infectious even when they have a positive PCR test because, get this, they have a very high ct of over 30.
Oh, and look at the graphic he posted along with it, finally the type of graphic I would have liked to see for a year now:
View attachment 2149867
See how there's a big bulb over ct>30 values even for completely unvaccinated people?
And how they're apparently cut off the ct for vaccinated people?
And how non-vaccinated, not previously positive for 1-21 before vaccination looks basically like 21 days after first dose, no second dose with a different total scale?
There might have been a very, very good reason why the ct value statistics aren't made as public as the other numbers...
/edit:
Note the medians and quartiles in the box plots as well. And the last two plots, post second dose, and not vaccinated and previously positive. Nearly identical.
This Minecraft server really needs to become PvP FFA.
/edit2:
Seriously. Look at the medians and quartiles. Uppermost violin, not vaccinated, no previous infection >21 days before vaccination. Total number 10,636. Lower quartile down to 20, I guess. Median ct at 27. Upper quartile 32. Let's assume a ct of 25 was basically clean. That means basically half of those 10k people are practically not infected at all.
Hell, put the "dangerous ct" at 30. Still means that the number of actually "dangerous" cases is reduced by a quarter.
The second one is even worse, 1-21 days before vaccination. Here the median is at 32 or something, lower and upper quartiles at 27 and 35 or so. You can basically dismiss three quarters of those positive tests as not dangerous, and yet the full amount of positive tests is used to justify lockdowns and restrictions.
Yesterday's test numbers in Germany were about 18k. It seems that around half of those will have had a ct of >30, so we should just ignore them.
This one graphic kinda really shows the scale of the inflation of test numbers.
Good thing Lauterbach didn't post the source study.