- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Newspaper at the stand with the headline that 2021 could or would have a higher death toll than 2020.
They really want people to be afraid 24-7, don't they?
They really want people to be afraid 24-7, don't they?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well because that would be like when Donald Trump told you to shine a light in your lungs which would KILL PEOPLE. That was almost as bad as when he told people to DRINK BLEACH!So I've been again thinking about UV-C disinfection of air, and how I remember that over the past year I've seen it mentioned a few times in media, but there was not really much of a public push to get air cleaners into offices and schools. Public "experts" had concerns and dismissed the idea, despite being in successfull use for decades in medical environments. I was wondering why that is, why rather push for mechanical filters.
Might it be because they know viral inactivation via UV-C light is not compatible with the PCR test? It doesn't destroy viruses, it inactivates them, so if someone is spreading a significant viral load in an office, others might get a large enough load to get a positive PCR test as well, despite the viral load being harmless.
I don't see how living like that would be fun, it would be very stressfull, a struggle for survival, pray to God it never comes to this.No government assistance? That means no paying taxes either...
Living life as some sort of unvaccinated outlaw preying on those who have the mark of the beast and fighting against Satan sounds metal as hell.
I am so sick of this cult-like insanity.[...]
Coming back to this, apparently in Germany the ct values are handled as ct<30 being definitely positive, and ct>30 being "low concentration", which is considered positive, but acknowledged as not really useful for saying anything about how contagious the person is.Oh wow, our head Branch Covidian now claims that we know that vaccinated people are not infectious even when they have a positive PCR test because, get this, they have a very high ct of over 30.
Oh, and look at the graphic he posted along with it, finally the type of graphic I would have liked to see for a year now:
View attachment 2149867
See how there's a big bulb over ct>30 values even for completely unvaccinated people?
And how they're apparently cut off the ct for vaccinated people?
And how non-vaccinated, not previously positive for 1-21 before vaccination looks basically like 21 days after first dose, no second dose with a different total scale?
There might have been a very, very good reason why the ct value statistics aren't made as public as the other numbers...
/edit:
Note the medians and quartiles in the box plots as well. And the last two plots, post second dose, and not vaccinated and previously positive. Nearly identical.
This Minecraft server really needs to become PvP FFA.
/edit2:
Seriously. Look at the medians and quartiles. Uppermost violin, not vaccinated, no previous infection >21 days before vaccination. Total number 10,636. Lower quartile down to 20, I guess. Median ct at 27. Upper quartile 32. Let's assume a ct of 25 was basically clean. That means basically half of those 10k people are practically not infected at all.
Hell, put the "dangerous ct" at 30. Still means that the number of actually "dangerous" cases is reduced by a quarter.
The second one is even worse, 1-21 days before vaccination. Here the median is at 32 or something, lower and upper quartiles at 27 and 35 or so. You can basically dismiss three quarters of those positive tests as not dangerous, and yet the full amount of positive tests is used to justify lockdowns and restrictions.
Yesterday's test numbers in Germany were about 18k. It seems that around half of those will have had a ct of >30, so we should just ignore them.
This one graphic kinda really shows the scale of the inflation of test numbers.
Good thing Lauterbach didn't post the source study.
crimes against humanity
I think questioning the official narrative has been shunned for a long time. If you question the narrative around 9/11 still people think they’re a conspiracy theorist or if you question central banking. Any time you get close to asking the right question they shut that shit down real fast.It's really fascinating trying to apply pre-2020 logic to Current Decade. Like why is telling people "I don't support vaccination, and here's why" considered the second worst thing you can do after saying "I think the 2020 US election was stolen, and here's why?" Their reasoning is that it's a "public health issue" and will literally kill people, but isn't this the same as arguing against any other public health measure? Shouldn't it be just as bad to say "I think smoking should be allowed in buildings, and here's why" or "I think seatbelt laws are stupid, and here's why?" since doing either will also literally get people killed (and has)?
Yes, I know tobacco companies got huge fines from Congress for saying smoking didn't cause lung cancer and secondhand smoke didn't exist, but that's on the basis they were covering up the dangers of their product and thus is consumer deceit. It's not the same thing as a 3rd party weighing the evidence and deciding they believe smoking is good for you. I don't smoke and think most smoking restrictions are sane, but I don't believe it should be censored from existence or discussion. Like there's more of an argument for hate speech being banned than there is for questioning public health policy.
Basically, why is saying "I don't believe what public health experts say about this" on some subjects considered okay but certain topics are forbidden from questioning? Maybe it really is better to go through life without thinking and trying to apply logic to things, because you'll only be driven to insanity.
Well because that would be like when Donald Trump told you to shine a light in your lungs which would KILL PEOPLE. That was almost as bad as when he told people to DRINK BLEACH!
You have to get a shot to travel?Got my shot since I wanna travel sometime soon, been feeling like trash for more than 24h. Constant pain, headache, chills, skin burning to the slightest touch and the urge to vomit. I've been promised slight flu symptoms and some arm pain. Good thing my weekend's off otherwise I'd have shot myself in the head. If I had a choice I'd rather not get the jab
That's the way it's going in a lot of countries already. For example, the EU is developing a covid passport for travel across internal borders. They expect visitors to use it to travel in and out of the union as well.You have to get a shot to travel?
Yeah sadly you do, not sure how it is outside of EU/Russia zone but over here you pretty much will need a certificate if you wanna cross the borders. And people started selling fakes of those on the dark web already lolYou have to get a shot to travel?
My wife and I visited my dad and step-mom at their house, and my step mom was wearing a mask. She asked if I would put one on and I laughed in her face.Yesterday I mentioned to a friend a thing where a bunch of politicians were gathered and everyone in the room were vaccinated, but were all wearing masks. I asked, If they want to encourage people to get vaccinated shouldn't they be NOT wearing masks, since they're vaccinated and therefore "safe?"
My friend, who I'm seriously thinking of downgrading to acquaintance, blew up and started shouting at me, using words that made me think he was hallucinating that he was speaking to an especially slow child. "IF YOU HAVE THE GERMS THEN YOU CAN STILL SPREAD THE GERMS TO SOMEONE ELSE EVEN IF YOU YOURSELF ARE SAFE!!!! THESE PEOPLE NOT WEARING MASKS ARE SELFISH STUPID IDIOTS AND THEY ARE WHY THIS WILL NEVER END!!!!"
I pointed out again that everyone in the room was vaccinated. Everyone. Why masks?
He spluttered a bit and just repeated at a slightly lower volume and using a different mix of similar words the same thing he had just said. At that point I could see that I was speaking to someone impared so I waved it off and changed the subject.
I do not like what the past year or so has done to people.
I will be shocked if this goes anywhere. One can dream I suppose...
That's adorable. You're too kind."They" need to be voted out.
Of course, they'll find an excuse to exempt the peaceful migrants of diversity and tollerance.That's the way it's going in a lot of countries already. For example, the EU is developing a covid passport for travel across internal borders. They expect visitors to use it to travel in and out of the union as well.