BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

Destiny and Xanderhal's girlfriend 'Lani' are fighting on Twitter.
There is a lot more than this I just didnt want to spam the thread.
Screenshot_20210509-191628_Twitter.jpgScreenshot_20210509-191832_Twitter.jpgScreenshot_20210509-191728_Twitter.jpgScreenshot_20210509-191709_Twitter.jpgScreenshot_20210509-191701_Twitter.jpgScreenshot_20210509-191820_Twitter.jpg
 
Someone needs to change his twitter bio. View attachment 2150917
View attachment 2150918
Neanderhal's avatar should become less and less smug as his channel slowly withers and his bio gets longer to compensate.

"You think I'm a retard? Explain why I have 61,900 subs. Subs are IQ, which is fake by the way."
where is infrared's thread?

View attachment 2156303
Unless he does something aside from being a swarthy retard he feels more like a clown for hire and not worth delving much into, IMO.

He's one of those people who may actually be special ed, but troll on top of that and at this point is more like a monkey than a cow.
 
Tom Nicholas' more recent uploads seem to be trying to ape the Contra/PT/Hbomberguy formula, i.e. long-from diatribes on a certain subject where the speaker sits or stands in front of a camera with a set and/or a costume. Right now though he's got about 194k subs so he's not quite at the popularity level of the big three at the moment.
There are quite a few youtubers who keep adding superfluous flourishes to their videos. Most of them cannot pull it off and come off as Nostalgia Critic 2.0 with their skits and costumes. Knowing Better would be an example. It all is painfully cringe and completely unnecessary.

Then factor in the incestuous relationships leftubers have with one another and how they use their contacts to escalate. Breatube currently has the video essayist and media reviewing communities grabbed by their tortured cock and balls and those communities they don't have a sizeable number in already, they have at least a couple of useful guys in. Mother's Basement and Super Eyepatch Wolf watch over the NEETs while bringing anime to more "likable" people, D'Angelo Wallace and Curtis Conner are rising stars in the commentary community with that fuckboy look and extra attention to moralize drama. Most of Channel Awesome and their hanger-on bent the knee to them. Don't forget that H3 invited Hontra, the Nephew, and followed Vaush asking him to "radicalize him" while Jacksfilms and Internet Comment Etiquette were each holding one of his beaten testicles.
This is very true and very disappointing. Because the sphere of media critique on YouTube is occupied by leftists, every single piece of it is predictable and samey.

At the same time, it seems like people who are not leftists reject the idea of looking at works through various critical lenses altogether, which is a shame. It is entirely possible to understand and employ Marxist or feminist criticism without considering it the most useful or fitting.

As such, the choice seems to be between leftists generating stale readings and mouth-breathers who think pointing out plotholes is all there is to it, few exceptions aside. I wonder if this situation will ever change. YouTube video essays are babby’s first media critique, and so it would be a shame if young people got an impression that this is what they have to pick from.


Youtube keeps recommending more and more breadtube analysis videos and it always some fat white guy ranting about media meant for young girls.
Seriously if you see a fat white guy with glasses, it is always a breadtube video now nine times out of ten now on youtube.

I timestamped the part where the eventual breadtubers monologue comes in where they have to compare any piece of media somehow back to white supremacy.
Even though this media is from South Korea and has literally next to no relation to the subject because it's about some gay serial killer who buttfucks some creepy twink who broke into his house.

They even used a Tom Preston image for moderates and somehow manages to mention JK Rowling in it.

They literally all act and look the same now
I finally got round to watching this. Right up my alley: I have read Killing Stalking beginning to end.

Killing Stalking in its content is nearly identical to much of yaoi and bara manga and slash fanfiction using erotic framing to depict sadomasochistic relationships. It is not meant to be ‘romantic’ in the traditional sense of the word, but it is meant to be sensual and titillating. Like rape and torture porn — but long and with a plot.

It is not a coincidence that Koogi, the author of Killing Stalking, retweets yaoi fanart of her characters. It is not a coincidence that Lezhin Comics, the webtoon portal which published Killing Stalking, traffics in homoerotic fiction. This is a psychological horror, yes, but it is also wanking material. All those sex scenes, as graphic as Korean laws would allow, did not appear by accident.

Killing Stalking is a decent work, but it is not novel in regards to its mixture of erotic and horrific. Gengoroh Tagame, a gay man, has been publishing sadomasochistic homoerotic porn since the late eighties, and it would be interesting to hear somebody explain pages-long genital torture and mutilation scenes in The House of Brutes as anything other than pornography.

It is hard to say what causes people to be so off in their analyses of works such as this. Perhaps they are unfamiliar with the Asian tradition and so cannot contextualise such fiction. Perhaps they can never put away the lens of their politics to inspect a work from different perspectives.

The author’s attempts to wrap his heads around the shipping community are very familiar — and very condescending. Why do people think this is ‘romantic’? Are women brainwashed by society into viewing abuse as love? Maybe straights simply cannot imagine queers having a healthy relationship? Could it be that readers are too simple-minded to decipher the message of the work?

There is an explanation far simpler that does not insult anybody’s intelligence: some people enjoy sadistic erotica. It may reflect badly on them, and it may be uncomfortable to think about, but it is what it is.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2157350

I wish this was real, but it appears to just be random /chan larping. If anything were to come of it, I'd expect it to be Peter outed as even worse than we already know he is.
The most unrealistic thing about this post is Peter dropping damning information on philosophy troon and hontra. his style is passive aggressive quote tweets or incredibly vague and broad statements.
 
The author’s attempts to wrap his heads around the shipping community are very familiar — and very condescending. Why do people think this is ‘romantic’? Are women brainwashed by society into viewing abuse as love? Maybe straights simply cannot imagine queers having a healthy relationship? Could it be that readers are too simple-minded to decipher the message of the work?

There is an explanation far simpler that does not insult anybody’s intelligence: some people enjoy sadistic erotica. It may reflect badly on them, and it may be uncomfortable to think about, but it is what it is.
i also love the stupid implication that young women in particular can't understand sadistic homoeroticism.
loner teen girls absolutely love the macabre, and like the idea of taboo relationships with edgy men in them.
it's like he doesn't even remember that hannibal happened. saying it's "bad" is noise. just pissing in the wind.
torture porn and people who like torture porn are going to happen anyway. you cannot control everyone.

edit: it all comes down to this. if you think it's untenable for ANYONE to do something, then the next logical step is a ban.
short of that, realizing that's draconian, deal with it. especially if it's an issue of freedom of speech or expression, like this is.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2157350

I wish this was real, but it appears to just be random /chan larping. If anything were to come of it, I'd expect it to be Peter outed as even worse than we already know he is.
Unless Contra is revealed to be a pedophile, you are not going to cancel him. If anything, he's just going to get even richer crying about being a "victim" on the internet.
 
Destiny and Xanderhal's girlfriend 'Lani' are fighting on Twitter.
There is a lot more than this I just didnt want to spam the thread.
View attachment 2156627View attachment 2156629View attachment 2156630View attachment 2156632View attachment 2156635View attachment 2156636
And once again Xanderhal did absolutely nothing about it (unless you count one retweet) cause he values being able to have Destiny on more than he does Lani. Wouldn't be surprised if they had a fight over it
x12.PNG
 
View attachment 2157350

I wish this was real, but it appears to just be random /chan larping. If anything were to come of it, I'd expect it to be Peter outed as even worse than we already know he is.
isnt peter coffin the guy with the imaginary girlfriend
i doubt this loser has the progressive clout to cancel king troon himself lol
 
Xanderhal bitches about his analytics and accidentally reveals that he is boring.

https://twitter.com/XanderhalTV/status/1391697325219737602 (archive)

1620646009800.png


So, on average, people watched 15 minutes into this video. And that average is trending upwards, right? Okay. How long is the video?


OW SHIT! it's almost 40 minutes long! So that must mean that over half of the viewers don't even stay till near the end of a 40 minute rambling response video hosted by a guy with the charisma and enthusiasm of a deflated pancake! No way!

EDIT: wrong url
 
Last edited:
And once again Xanderhal did absolutely nothing about it (unless you count one retweet) cause he values being able to have Destiny on more than he does Lani. Wouldn't be surprised if they had a fight over it
View attachment 2157576
I would second this- that and now he's trying to keep the peace with her by wordlessly retweeting what she said while still being annoyed she put him into yet another stupid situation. Too bad she pays the bills and is more of a mom than an equal.
 
Back