- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
Thats the reason why those wwii diversity arguments are retarded, and would be like saying that Sauron was the good guy because his armies of enslaved soldiers were diverse pocs. The armies of both sides in WWII were incredibly diverse on both sides, which makes the argument moot. Instead, it's important to focus on the ideologies that spurred those men to fight for their countries, because focusing on the racial aspects is essentially playing into the hands of the woke.At the danger of sounding like a woke bitch, weren't those millions of proud indians and blacks either colonial troops or segregated under the command of white officers?
Would the axis have been more diverse if they had millions of slave soldiers? At least the nips and finns give them some asian diversity.
Also instead of the colonial troops it would have been better to bribg up the Chinese. Being a actual participant with their own leaders and generals. But I get that they tend to be overlooked, I almost forgot about them myself.