The Mysterious Mr. Enter / Jonathan Rozanski's "Growing Around" - IndieGoGo Campaign Failed, John going off the deep end, "Turning Red" is ignorant about 9/11 (later retracted)

  • Thread starter Thread starter LN 910
  • Start date Start date
I said this before and I say this again:

No. It used to mean actually cancelling someone from his/her job and even going a step further via removing sponsors, make sure he/she is miserable for the rest of his/her life in the future all over some dumb opinions.

Nowadays, it just means criticising someone, even when it's just a small group of people criticising said person. I don't give a shit if these "small group of people" would potentially have power if that power would later mean jack shit. Fuck's sake, even a furry who literally raped animals who even went to court screams about "muh cancel culture" when he gets criticised and mocked for it.
I’m well aware of the Kero the Wolf situation. At one point my original Username was KeroHippo taken from a random name generator, then this shit with a furry I had never heard of happened and I had to beg for a name change.
It’s still my most shameful moment on the site
 
At least he isn’t like his old editor, Crimson Mayhem that’s for sure.
View attachment 2159866
(https://archive.md/4VLOl)

What the fuck is Crimson even talking about? Can you imagine actually thinking Disney cares about woke shit and diversity?
I wouldn't be surprised. I know a lot of people who used to be against cancel culture now saying they support it.

I find a lot of people support "cancel culture" in some way. To be fair, did anyone cry when Weinstein or Bill Cosby was cancelled? I mostly complained about Weinstein's enablers, but its a good thing he got removed. Cancel culture is an issue when someone says some dumb political take, and people on twitter say "I was literally physically harmed by this post! This person should be fired!" or some faggy shit like that.
 
I just find it hilarious that the Internet has gone from "Screaming at Hollywood does literally nothing" to "Screaming at Hollywood is legitimate terrorism" the moment angry YouTube critics went out of vogue, like they didn't want to get on their high horse until anyone who could disprove their point got off their own.
I mean, in some ways both are true statements.
 
What the fuck is Crimson even talking about? Can you imagine actually thinking Disney cares about woke shit and diversity?
Three weeks ago, some Disney fan named Jonathan VanBoskerck, complained about Disney being too politically correct.

05B2DE7A-EE79-4402-BDBA-596F82BC6573.png


(https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opi...h2bfzfcbauj4rdurjoy-story.html?outputType=amp)
 
Three weeks ago, some Disney fan named Jonathan VanBoskerck, complained about Disney being too politically correct.

View attachment 2167558

(https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opi...h2bfzfcbauj4rdurjoy-story.html?outputType=amp)
He can see the front of your face and your profile at the same time.
Found some of the Tweets about this and the comments are filled with black separatists seething at the concept of inter-racial dating like they're white racists from the 1950s. The horseshoe is real.
 
Last edited:
Found some of the Tweets about this and the comments are filled with black separatists seething at the concept of inter-racial dating like they're white racists from the 1950s. The horseshoe is real.
At the risk of being a bit off-topic, this is why you should never bend the knee to progressives: they'll never be happy, no matter what you do. For every thing you do "right", there's always going to be something that is going piss some special snowflake off.
 
He can see the front of your face and your profile at the same time.

Found some of the Tweets about this and the comments are filled with black separatists seething at the concept of inter-racial dating like they're white racists from the 1950s. The horseshoe is real.
I grew up watching the Proud Family, so I'm pretty sure anyone seething at this missed any sort of message the show tried to tell.

I actually like the concept of this Proud Family reboot thing, but its really funny to see so called "progressives" on twitter being incredibly racist at something so simple as dating a different race.

Speaking of twitter, the only thing fucking me up about the reboot is the "14 year old" activist thing, but that's only because twitter is full of 14 year old kids watching motherfuckers like Vaush and thinking "I now know everything I need to know about politics".

Keke's character's probably going to be wise beyond her years, though. I'd actually be happily surprised if her character arch went something like "huh, I really jumped the gun with (insert political bullshit here). I should get more experience before trying again!".

Also, I like the design of the gay couple. They look smug and fun to me.

At the risk of being a bit off-topic, this is why you should never bend the knee to progressives: they'll never be happy, no matter what you do. For every thing you do "right", there's always going to be something that is going piss some special snowflake off.
That's true, but with how progressive The Proud Family was (not to mention funny and it remembered it was a cartoon and not a soapbox), I'm not surprised to see Twitter trying to find a bone to pick with it Even in that "holy glow up" tweet where gay boy is now some trans whatever, that seems in place with the story to a degree, so twitter has to REALLY break out the microscope to get offended here.

I think he might be the only person who straight up remembers this movie

I wish he remembers his own cartoon Growing Around so that I don't have to talk about mediocre Disney channel shows, twitter racists, and gay guys.
 
"these are the most disturbing visuals I have seen in any animated film"

The visuals:
View attachment 2168488

I know he is playing it up to get more people to do patron reviews. Its very shallow and everyone can tell. This man has seen Where the Dead go to Die lmao.
Yeah, that was overdramatic of him. I don't think little girls are gonna be as scared of that as he thinks they will be. Enter's playing it up because he's trying to speak for their perspectives.

The facial animations and animations in this movie, in general, are off-putting, but there's no way I would've been scared of this as a kid. I wasn't a tough kid, mind you. This dude's a bad guy. Bad guys are supposed to look menacing.

There were scarier visuals in Don Bluth films and even in classic Disney.

On that note, does his autism make faces scarier to him?

:thinking:
 
Last edited:
Yeah
I'm exaggerating lol
it was something along the lines of "loves gross out humor, this world's equivalent of erotica"
god, that's so unsettling. Why couldn't he just cut it off at "loves gross-out humor??" Did he really have to tell us it's that world's equivalent to porn? If, in the show itself, it was treated like pornography and it was played for comedic effect, it'd be funny! Saying it like that in the character sheet is just gross.
 
"these are the most disturbing visuals I have seen in any animated film"

The visuals:
View attachment 2168488

I know he is playing it up to get more people to do patron reviews. Its very shallow and everyone can tell. This man has seen Where the Dead go to Die lmao.
It's not even disturbing or scary. The graphics looks more like a fantasy than a horror film Mr Enter's sensitive ass is trying to label it as, which is 99.9% likely it IS a fantasy-based film in the first place. Plus, have he even SEEN scarier looking stuff like Five Nights At Freddy's or something (or something ACTUALLY scary in general)? Well no, because the only thing he does for a living ever since the early 2010's is review cartoons... badly.
 
Back