Clashes between Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem. Israel now invading Gaza according to (Questionable) Reports - If your thoughts are "I don't like either" you don't need to fucking post because it's been said 100 times you fucking dullard

[Regenbogen]

Israel's definition of a military asset is, as they phrase it:

yet they refuse to provide any concrete evidence that these buildings are being used for these things in a way that requires a strike on the building itself.
Strikes are unilateral, with ample time provided to evacuate (and move equipment) yet for some reason it's only ever the people leaving, as though no such critical military equipment exists.
Based on the IDF's hot take, it seems likely that if you have a Hamas member hiding under his bed and using his phone to talk about what targets to strike next, your otherwise completely fine apartment and office complex is fair game. (You're also fair game if you own a random home in the middle of the refugee camp that has zero Hamas members in it, but a lot of women and children, because if it happens while the Western media is sleeping, it's perfectly OK!)
Why aren't they providing phone conversations, demands that the equipment is shut off/destroyed? If they're using some sort of signal tracking, they would know if the shit comes back online. If they have no evidence they can reasonably share, they have no business striking these locations, when they still aren't getting many/any rocket batteries or munition stockpiles hosted in the city proper.
If they're SO CONCERNED about "Palestinian bodyshields," wouldn't Hamas moving the equipment to the tunnels, which Israel can safely bomb without crippling innocent Palestinians, be a good thing?
It makes no sense.


Your interpretation of the situation is gibberish, and you even contradict it yourself. If there's a "mandatory Palestine" in 1922, how is there no Palestine? The image you have posted to support this retarded idea is in fact asserting that the Palestinians have claimed "full independence" in 1995 for the first time ever, instead of being supported by British mandate.
This is why 1967 has dark spots that mysteriously correlate with full Gaza & the West Bank re-negotiated in 1967, and 1947 is all dark, which mysteriously correlates with the time when Israel was the second state and MP was given most of the land. Notice how the West Bank has even shrunk since 1967.
Here's an overlap of the Jazeera map and your so-called "real history" correlating by date, almost like they're depicting the exact same thing. As anyone with eyes can see, these mysterious dark spots and Palestine correlate directly:
View attachment 2172536
Al Jazeera overestimates somewhat the land that Palestine controls 95-20XX IMO, but they are biased.

mandatory palestine isn't "palestinian arab control" but i'm the retard

also why did you post a map that agrees with my point

 

[MaskedHussar11]

Ironically, Nina Paley the author of the "This Land is Mine" animation is a based Terf that has been deplateformed by queer activists for her based terfery. Read everything about it on her blog: https://blog.ninapaley.com/category/terfy/page/3/

She is atheist and clearly, not zionist. An interesting mind all around.
Anyway neither "Jews control the world" nor "Arabs are backward retads" are good takes on this clusterfuck.

Seder-Masochism is a facinating watch which I similtaneously love and disagree with almost everything it has to say. It is art, in the purest sense. I highly recommend watching it if for no other reason than she has good music taste. And the fact that she is a based TERF just makes it better.

 

[Regenbogen]

Seder-Masochism is a facinating watch which I similtaneously love and disagree with almost everything it has to say. It is art, in the purest sense. I highly recommend watching it if for no other reason than she has good music taste. And the fact that she is a based TERF just makes it better.

i might be interpreting it wrong but from what I see it's the classic "religion caused every conflict" thing, as if war is bad by necessity and there was no wars over territory or resources and all religions are the same

 

[Dogfacefuke]

The Palestinians are allowing themselves to be wiped out for the Western World.

The Jews have always held the Holocaust against the Whites, and the virtuous Palestinians have seen that and have always felt bad about it. And so they are making the ultimate sacrafice.

The Jews freeboated from nation to nation, enjoying the privileges of each country but without any of the responsibility that comes with running a civilized society. Like children they ceaselessly whinned and complained. They had no concept of what it meant to maintain the walls and keep the barbarians at bay.

Now the Palestinians are showing them what it means to maintain enlightenment values. They purposely appeared to be poor, lazy, and stupid, and without skill, so that the Jews would be forced to kick them out of their homes. They purposely pretended to shoot harmless rockets at the Jews so they would be forced to retaliate.

Now, with the lessons learned from the Fatherly Hitler, the Jews have the manual memorized. Hitler was only trying to teach them a lesson, like any father would, but the Jews were ungrateful, they wouldn't listen.

The Palestinians are making the ultimate sacrafice for the Western world, and I salute them.

At last the Jews will understand what it means to run a civilized society in this world, and we will no longer have to listen to the childish crys of the Jews, moaning on and on about the Holocaust. We can simply say "Palestine".

It is time now, Israel, time to enact the Final Solution. You will forever be bloodied, as all civilized nations are.

 

[Regenbogen]

The Palestinians are allowing themselves to be wiped out for the Western World.

The Jews have always held the Holocaust against the Whites, and the virtuous Palestinians have seen that and have always felt bad about it. And so they are making the ultimate sacrafice.

The Jews freeboated from nation to nation, enjoying the privileges of each country but without any of the responsibility that comes with running a civilized society. Like children they ceaselessly whinned and complained. They had no concept of what it meant to maintain the walls and keep the barbarians at bay.

Now the Palestinians are showing them what it means to maintain enlightenment values. They purposely appeared to be poor, lazy, and stupid, and without skill, so that the Jews would be forced to kick them out of their homes. They purposely pretended to shoot harmless rockets at the Jews so they would be forced to retaliate.

Now, with the lessons learned from the Fatherly Hitler, the Jews have the manual memorized. Hitler was only trying to teach them a lesson, like any father would, but the Jews were ungrateful, they wouldn't listen.

The Palestinians are making the ultimate sacrafice for the Western world, and I salute them.

At last the Jews will understand what it means to run a civilized society in this world, and we will no longer have to listen to the childish crys of the Jews, moaning on and on about the Holocaust. We can simply say "Palestine".

It is time now, Israel, time to enact the Final Solution. You will forever be bloodied, as all civilized nations are.

absolute goobertalk, not a single palestinian nigger gives a shit about you or your family

also people already cry about palestine

 

[Autopsy]

mandatory palestine isn't "palestinian arab control"
but i'm the retard

The physical human beings occupying and asserting, regardless of if their claims were backed by international pressure against Zionist (not pro-Israel, actual Zionist) expansionism, were these "Palestinian Arabs."
If not, why were the wars fought? Where were the Brits bombing Israel in each clash?
It makes zero sense to assert that land lived on and operated by "Palestinian Arabs" is not under "palestinian arab control." The fact that things have gotten to this point and the Palestinians have successfully (to now) tried to create a region with no co-governance, and then they took control of the West Bank & Gaza in the process, the same places that were the hubs of Palestine in the Mandatory Palestine era, asserts that Palestine was Palestine, regardless of the mandate.
Yes, you are the retard.

Now the Palestinians are showing them what it means to maintain enlightenment values. They purposely appeared to be poor, lazy, and stupid, and without skill, so that the Jews would be forced to kick them out of their homes. They purposely pretended to shoot harmless rockets at the Jews so they would be forced to retaliate.

This makes about as much sense to me as whatever the fuck Hamas thinks it's accomplishing. What a noble sacrifice, I guess.

Edit:

The West Bank and Gaza were claimed as Jordanian/Egyptian land, not Palestinian. Claiming that the West Bank/Gaza count as land controlled by Palestinians post 48 - pre 67 betrays a shocking amount of ignorance. Mandatory Palestine was the name of a region, not a state. The West Bank is smaller because of the conditions agreed upon by the Oslo accords, AJ only counts areas A and B as palestinian controlled.

I don't want to blow another post on this, but I disagree with AJ because they still believe A and B are Palestinian controlled, which does not reflect Israeli settlements in those areas. Mandatory Palestine still had people in it, and it's been the same people from 17 to 67. Caring about whether the Jordanians or Egyptians or Arabs or whoever at the time intended to claim it is semantic when the people are still there.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Your interpretation of the situation is gibberish, and you even contradict it yourself. If there's a "mandatory Palestine" in 1922, how is there no Palestine? The image you have posted to support this retarded idea is in fact asserting that the Palestinians have claimed "full independence" in 1995 for the first time ever, instead of being supported by British mandate.
This is why 1967 has dark spots that mysteriously correlate with full Gaza & the West Bank re-negotiated in 1967, and 1947 is all dark, which mysteriously correlates with the time when Israel was the second state and MP was given most of the land. Notice how the West Bank has even shrunk since 1967.
Here's an overlap of the Jazeera map and your so-called "real history" correlating by date, almost like they're depicting the exact same thing. As anyone with eyes can see, these mysterious dark spots and Palestine correlate directly:
View attachment 2172536
Al Jazeera overestimates somewhat the land that Palestine controls 95-20XX IMO, but they are biased.

The West Bank and Gaza were claimed as Jordanian/Egyptian land, not Palestinian. Claiming that the West Bank/Gaza count as land controlled by Palestinians post 48 - pre 67 betrays a shocking amount of ignorance. Mandatory Palestine was the name of a region, not a state. The West Bank is smaller because of the conditions agreed upon by the Oslo accords, AJ only counts areas A and B as palestinian controlled.

 

[Regenbogen]

The physical human beings occupying and asserting, regardless of if their claims were backed by international pressure against Zionist (not pro-Israel, actual Zionist) expansionism, were these "Palestinian Arabs."
If not, why were the wars fought? Where were the Brits bombing Israel in each clash?
It makes zero sense to assert that land lived on and operated by "Palestinian Arabs" is not under "palestinian arab control." The fact that things have gotten to this point and the Palestinians have successfully (to now) tried to create a region with no co-governance, and then they took control of the West Bank & Gaza in the process, the same places that were the hubs of Palestine in the Mandatory Palestine era, asserts that Palestine was Palestine, regardless of the mandate.
Yes, you are the retard.


This makes about as much sense to me as whatever the fuck Hamas thinks it's accomplishing. What a noble sacrifice, I guess.

Excuse me but was the north of France during WW2 under French control? Or for better example, Congo under Congolese control because they were the majority?

 

[Autopsy]

Excuse me but was the north of France during WW2 under French control just because French people lived there?

The north of France during WW2 was occupied. Mandatory Palestine & the people within were not under regular occupation until 48, migrated out of Jew-controlled areas, and now have been losing land since 67. The past century of Israeli expansion has been specifically about occupying the bits of land with too many Arabs to simply force out, at least not without losing international support.
You're missing the forest for the trees.
Edit: Comparison is extra daft, because significant pockets of France were not entirely occupied, and required constant German military police control and supervision. As it turns out, military action is not pretty colors on a map. Those pockets of resistance are analogous in some ways, though the French were clearly less successful than the Palestinians in reclaiming land.
If you for some reason think German should own modern-day France because it occupied a portion of it, then you can hold that view, and you would be at least consistent for believing it. I have no interest in that. The Congolese likewise never had a significant amount of control until they established a free state, which remains to this day. Poor choice to justify warcrimes, given the situation of the Congolese and modern sympathy for them.

 

[Wazzupnerds]

I'm just saying what everyone else is (or should be) thinking. I can't help it if some bowl cut psycho also finds it strange that the single most socioeconomically successful group in the country constantly complains they're actually oppressed victims of the people they lord over, and that--as a group--they consistently display hypocritical attitudes about what should happen to the United States vs what should happen to Israel. Funny how such a high IQ group can't seem to stay ideologically or intellectually consistent...

Perhaps he also thinks it's stupid that our country spends billions on military aid for one halfway across the world; does that warrant comparisons to mass murderers too? He'd probably also agree that water is wet.

I have no issue with people who want a homeland; I just wish they'd do it by helping, you know, their homeland instead of trying to destroy mine.

suicide bomb yourself

 

[Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER]

Every time the Palestinians attack Israel they complain about the Iron Wall that keeps them from killing Jews.

 

[Smug Cat]

View attachment 2172431
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1393563031658024962

Huge news, Operation Wrath of God 2 has launched. The leaders of Hamas in Qatar are now in danger.

Wrath of God 2 would unironically be a good idea here imo. Take out the actual leaders. Plus Operation Wrath of God was undeniably cool as fuck.

Hours before they died, each man's family received flowers and a condolence card bearing the same words: "A reminder we do not forget or forgive."

 

[LemmeSee]

View attachment 2172431
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1393563031658024962

Huge news, Operation Wrath of God 2 has launched. The leaders of Hamas in Qatar are now in danger.

Oh fuck yes. Mossad assassinations are massively kino in the aftermath when people are trying to piece together how they happened and who was Mossad.

 

[Kier]

Isreal has now bombed an Associated Press building. They really don't want actual news coverage.

https://archive.md/gUapG

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

The north of France during WW2 was occupied. Mandatory Palestine & the people within were not under regular occupation until 48, migrated out of Jew-controlled areas, and now have been losing land since 67. The past century of Israeli expansion has been specifically about occupying the bits of land with too many Arabs to simply force out, at least not without losing international support.
You're missing the forest for the trees.
Edit: Comparison is extra daft, because significant pockets of France were not entirely occupied, and required constant German military police control and supervision. As it turns out, military action is not pretty colors on a map. Those pockets of resistance are analogous in some ways, though the French were clearly less successful than the Palestinians in reclaiming land.
If you for some reason think German should own modern-day France because it occupied a portion of it, then you can hold that view, and you would be at least consistent for believing it. I have no interest in that. The Congolese likewise never had a significant amount of control until they established a free state, which remains to this day. Poor choice to justify warcrimes, given the situation of the Congolese and modern sympathy for them.

>losing land since 67

bruh what do you not understand about they never had the land as their own state until Oslo. Jordan didn't even give up their claim to the West Bank until 1988, before that Israel was considered to be occupying Jordanian territory. You could maybe make a case for Gaza due to the All Palestine Protectorate in Gaza but that was propped up by Egypt and was never independant.

 

[BibiLivesMatter]

Isreal has now bombed an Associated Press building. They really don't want actual news coverage.

Can't have bad PR if there's no PR.

 

[Lovecraft's Cat]

My summary of this thread so far: niggas is in paris

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

Really hard to pick a side in this quarrel when both partys are shit, and don't care who dies.

 

[Cubanodun]

The Great IGN civil war is upon us.

#TeamIGNIsrael

They are actually washing their hands saying that the IGN brand is just licensed to a different company so those kikes can go and die for all they care

 

[Inquisitor_BadAss]

Really hard to pick a side in this quarrel when both partys are shit, and don't care who dies.

Just sit back and watch the fireworks with the rest of us. You’ll have more fun that way.