- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
Why don't you just tell me why Bill Maher cancelled his show or why half the Yankees are on the covid list even though they've all been vaccinated?FTFY.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don't you just tell me why Bill Maher cancelled his show or why half the Yankees are on the covid list even though they've all been vaccinated?FTFY.
Because it is possible they could still spread it and they aren't sociopaths. I know sociopaths have extreme difficulty understanding why someone would do something that doesn't directly benefit them, but those of us with normal human motivations have no problem. Maybe they can't spread it, or it is unlikely. We don't actually know. But people with decency and concern for others are willing to inconvenience themselves slightly for the possible benefit of others.Why don't you just tell me why Bill Maher cancelled his show or why half the Yankees are on the covid list even though they've all been vaccinated?
A contrarian is someone who hears opinions and then arbitrarily chooses to adopt contrary opinions simply because he is a troll. It is defined by disingenuousness. You are choosing to be contrary in order to be obtuse, annoying, and milk reactions. A contrarian is not someone who has very different opinions from you, or from the general populace. That's just someone who doesn't agree with you. Accusing such a person of being "contrarian" is telling them their opinions aren't real, they are lying, and that they should stop lying and be honest.But being contrarian is fun, though!
What's the ratio of benefit to others vs inconvenience to self that you are willing to accept? How outsized can they get before you go "uh, nah, fuck yourself?" For me it's forced clothing and medication to prevent maybe possibly having a .01% chance of maybe possibly giving someone a virus that maybe possibly has a .01% chance of giving them a mild cough.But people with decency and concern for others are willing to inconvenience themselves slightly for the possible benefit of others.
No he isn't. It is entirely legitimate just to automatically gainsay whatever the other person says.A contrarian is someone who hears opinions and then arbitrarily chooses to adopt contrary opinions simply because he is a troll.
kNo he isn't. It is entirely legitimate just to automatically gainsay whatever the other person says.
I don't know but it's somewhere well below what we're looking at. In short, I'd make the same choice as Maher, who you might recall, is actually a bit of an antivaxer himself. We're also well below where I'd say the government should be going around forcing people to be vaccinated, by the way, at least in my opinion. I may personally ridicule the decision, but I don't think there should be guys with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other forcing the issue.What's the ratio of benefit to others vs inconvenience to self that you are willing to accept?
Thank you for your patience and understanding. Aren't you some kind of lawyer though? You probably shouldn't be calling others sociopaths, even if you are correct in this case.Because it is possible they could still spread it and they aren't sociopaths. I know sociopaths have extreme difficulty understanding why someone would do something that doesn't directly benefit them, but those of us with normal human motivations have no problem. Maybe they can't spread it, or it is unlikely. We don't actually know. But people with decency and concern for others are willing to inconvenience themselves slightly for the possible benefit of others.
I sympathize with your lack of ability to understand concepts like this, but normal people do not have any difficulty with this concept.
I didn't say I wasn't a sociopath myself. I actually am not, though I am adjacent probably. Bla bla dark triad traits etc. I am actually low on two of them but out the roof on one.Thank you for your patience and understanding. Aren't you some kind of lawyer though? You probably shouldn't be calling others sociopaths, even if you are correct in this case.
Never in my entire life have I known something Bill Maher thinks, and I plan to keep it that way. I have no idea what his stance on vaccines are. Why does he keep being brought up in this thread? It's creepy.In short, I'd make the same choice as Maher, who you might recall, is actually a bit of an antivaxer himself.
If I thought it mattered I would absolutely want guys with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other forcing the issue. It's binary to me, there's a steep cliff of caring. Either I don't care at all, or you should be forced. If It's not to the point where I think you should be forced, then I have absolutely no opinion and I don't care. It's just a coof.I may personally ridicule the decision, but I don't think there should be guys with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other forcing the issue.
If this shit was on the level of smallpox, yeah, I'd want the guy with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other. This shit isn't smallpox.Never in my entire life have I known something Bill Maher thinks, and I plan to keep it that way. I have no idea what his stance on vaccines are. Why does he keep being brought up in this thread? It's creepy.
If I thought it mattered I would absolutely want guys with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other forcing the issue. The fact that you don't is sus.
No. Either it's severe enough for me to care or it isn't. If it's severe enough for me to care then everyone should be forced to care. These things always go together.Do you get that there are degrees of severity where it's a really good idea to get vaccinated, and you're a dumbass if you don't, is FAR less serious than get the vaccine or get shot?
Then it's in the "i don't care" category. Those are the only two categories. It's one or the other.This particular virus is not remotely in the "force people to get vaccinated" category, at least if you aren't a healthcare worker or in some situation where your employer can say "get the jab or get lost."
No, I really can't dig it. I don't really understand the libtard perspective of being okay with people being wrong but still thinking they're wrong.This is in the category where I can say yes, I respect your RIGHT to refuse to get vaccinated. If the government actually tried to force you to get it (other than you actually being an employee in a relevant job), I'd say right on if you resisted.
That doesn't mean I respect the actual decision, though. I might call you a fucking retard for it.
Can you dig it?
I don't. If I thought you were being a dumbass I would want you forced not to be.I respect your RIGHT to be a dumbass
Harder, daddy.I don't. If I thought you were being a dumbass I would want you forced not to be.
Thanks King. God bless, stay hydrated, walk your dog.
You're a good-man.FTFY.
This literally couldn't be more wrong if you were actually trying to be wrong. Not even the fucking chink vaccine contains actual live virus or even remotely functional copies of the full virus. They are ALL based on the spike protein and that alone. They could not conceivably in a trillion years ever actually give you COVID.
How the fuck are you antivaxers all so absolutely ignorant and fucking retarded?
Behind every Goodman is a Badman.You're a good-man.
Dont give in Maskies!!
The guy you're replying to is confirmed to have debilitating autism to the point where he has no sex drive or any way of feeling empathyI don't know but it's somewhere well below what we're looking at. In short, I'd make the same choice as Maher, who you might recall, is actually a bit of an antivaxer himself. We're also well below where I'd say the government should be going around forcing people to be vaccinated, by the way, at least in my opinion. I may personally ridicule the decision, but I don't think there should be guys with a gun in one hand and a needle in the other forcing the issue.