That's all she knows. Being cute and upvoatable. It plays well with a certain audience, but not the Sam Seder crowd she's angling for.
It's been known since at least Orwell that language structures thought, hearing people agree with you is exhilarating like certain hard substances are, and so on. No room for complexity there it's sandwiched between poor language and a crippling, basic need. Basically when I look at Shoe I see a drug addict talking the lingo to get a nice hookup of validation.
I find this sort of "mask off" dialog refreshing, honestly. Like when anti-drug types admit that they want to inconvenience blacks and hippies whenever possible.
Good lord, vaush disavowing her really did unfuck her brain didn't it.
It's more likely she thinks the winds are shifting and is trying to go back to grifting the right.
Maybe we'll finally get to see those winds blow her wig off.
And her mission in life is to turn children into mice.
She still wouldn't leave the internet if that happened.
No. Hasan is too extreme for her. She might enjoy his looks, but listening to him talk about Islamic soldiers like they're brave warriors is cringe-inducing for everyone in the West. Same with Momo-kun, really. They talk about the mujahadeen as if they are knights or something, when that sort of thinking went out of style about 400 years ago, like everything else Islam thinks.
Hey, she gave five years of her life for a guy LARPing a knight. She might still be into it.
At one point, I lurked around her subreddit, and her own fans were making fun of her obsession with Tucker Carlson. Can you imagine getting wet over blowhard pundits?
I'm going to have a hard time wording this and it will likely sound retarded but whatever. Does Shoe actually get wet for Tucker? Who knows, maybe, but I doubt there's a considerable amount of real physical attraction there. There certainly could be considering she's a weirdo, I just doubt that it's her primary motivator for the very public and repetitive simping on his behalf.
For Shoe, I think it is a simple answer, for these reasons:
Pretty much. Shoe’s entire thread catalogues her ever changing views on politics. I’m not against people changing over time, but with Shoe, it’s so abrupt, and sometimes even contradictory to what she thought before, with little explanation given. I actually used to watch her in 2015/2016, but later learned that it was all a grift after learning about her past before that point. For instance, around 2017, Shoe began accepting nonbinaries, but did so after she debuted a YouTube video with Milo Stewart (who also has a thread here). Afterwards, her opinions kept getting more left-leaning, to a point where she started catering to Breadtube and rejecting her past persona. Now that Breadtube has become less popular than it used to be, she’s looking for another grift and is now going the populist route again, this time with more socialist leaning economics. As I said though, I’m okay with people changing their opinions, but when it is done this quickly, I cannot believe it’s genuine.
