Culture Shrek at 20: an unfunny and overrated low for blockbuster animation - The fairytale comedy was a hit with critics and audiences but its toilet humour, glibness and shoddy animation mark it out as a misfire

Article (archive)

-Start-

2048.jpg

Shrek has an outhouse with a working toilet.

It is not part of the film’s cynical brand of “irreverence” that an ogre’s latrine is supported by modern plumbing. And it’s certainly not consistent with the hygiene of a swamp-dwelling beast who bathes in mud, brushes his teeth in slime and boasts of a killer weed rat stew. But after our lime-green hero literally wipes his ass with a fairytale ending, it was apparently decided that the film needed that emphatic flushing sound before the Smash Mouth single All Star kicked in and the introductory montage could commence.

Twenty years later, that flushing sound seems to signify the moment when blockbuster animation circled the drain. Shrek is a terrible movie. It’s not funny. It looks awful. It would influence many unfunny, awful-looking computer-animated comedies that copied its formula of glib self-reference and sickly sweet sentimentality. Three of those terrible movies were sequels to Shrek and one was a spin-off with a sequel in the works. The curse has eased but not lifted.

And yet Shrek was a sensation with critics and audiences in 2001. After flailing in its early efforts to keep up with Disney – the animation house of which its co-founder, Jeffrey Katzenberg, was credited with reviving – DreamWorks had finally hit pay dirt, raising the possibility that it might become a viable challenger to established major studios. Even the stuffed shirts at the Cannes film festival, who usually separated Hollywood summer fare from its official selections, brought it into the competition slate, where it premiered alongside new work from world masters like David Lynch, Jean-Luc Godard, Hou Hsiao-hsien and Jacques Rivette. (Liv Ullmann’s jury left it empty-handed, alas.)

It’s hard to account for why Shrek hit the cultural moment as squarely as it did – other than, you know, people seemed to enjoy it – or why it will be celebrated in 20th anniversary pieces other than this one. But it’s worth pointing out how comprehensively bad its legacy remains, opening up the floodgates for other major studios to pile celebrities into recording booths, feed them committee-polished one-liners and put those lines in the mouths of sassy CGI animals or human-ish residents of the uncanny valley. Worse yet, it encouraged a destructive, know-it-all attitude toward the classics that made any earnest engagement with them seem like a waste of time. Those once-upon-a-times were now rendered stodgy and lame, literally toilet paper.


Their replacement? Chiefly a flatulent ogre voiced by Mike Myers, who deploys the same accent that carried him through the All Things Scottish sketches on Saturday Night Live. Myers was only just past peak of his popularity when he replaced fellow SNL alum Chris Farley as Shrek, still riding high off two hit Austin Powers movies and still powerful enough to get DreamWorks to shrug its shoulders over allowing him to redo the part in Scottish. For years, Shrek had seemed like a disaster in the making – writers assigned to polish up the script likened it to “the Gulag” – but the conceptual hook of its fairytale universe, combined with the buddy chemistry of Myers and Eddie Murphy as Donkey, and Cameron Diaz as Fiona, an up-for-anything damsel-in-distress, was stronger than they could have realized.

In fact, the roadmap for Shrek had already been drawn years earlier with The Princess Bride, a fractured fairytale that found the right balance between knowing, gently absurdist plays on storybook tradition and a sincere affirmation of their power. There is even a scene in Shrek that nods to the torture machine in the earlier film, with the evil Lord Farquaad (John Lithgow) working over the Gingerbread Man for information. But the balance in Shrek is off on both ends: there’s an excess of anachronisms and buddy-movie riffs from Myers and Murphy that have little relation to the backdrop and a woe-is-me soppiness to the love story between two lonely, misunderstood freaks. (Nothing screams “unearned gravitas” like slipping in a cover of Leonard Cohen’s Hallelujah.)

2048 (1).jpg

The most curious element of Shrek is how uninterested it seems to be in the fairytale universe it creates. In recent years, as studios have merged and brands have been further reinforced, we’re seen plenty of eagerness for companies to trot out their IP – hello, Space Jam: A New Legacy – but there is much greater promise in a film that’s about fairytale favorites under threat, from nursery rhymes to the Brothers Grimm. Some of these creatures are assembled in mass detentions by Lord Farquaad, who exiles them to Shrek’s swamp, and Princess Fiona’s dilemma, imprisoned in a dragon-guarded castle tower, recalls Sleeping Beauty. But once Shrek and Donkey cross the kingdom on a quest to bring Fiona to Farquaad, the storybook references are all but abandoned. Even when Robin Hood and his Merry Men appear in the woods, the film blows past that boring old mythos in order to pay homage to The Matrix and Riverdance.

What’s left is an all-ages film that’s somehow more crude and juvenile in its appeals to adults than children. The grownups in the room can snicker knowingly at Farquaad’s name and the repeated references to his penis size while the kids are left with fart jokes and the wanton diminishment of timeless characters and stories. Last year, the National Film Registry added Shrek to the Library of Congress, which seals its canonization, but it’s remarkable how much of an early aughts relic it’s become, an amber-preserved monument to phenomena (Mike Myers, Smash Mouth, Michael Flatley) that hasn’t stood the test of time. Even the film’s referential style looks resolutely slow and unhip next to the whirring pop Cuisinarts of Lord and Miller productions like The Lego Movie and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse or even IP-heavy Disney fare like Wreck-it Ralph and its sequel.

In the end, Shrek didn’t save DreamWorks from selling itself off a few years later. It didn’t extend Myers’s career past a hard expiration date. And Katzenberg went on to found Quibi. The entire enterprise is better left in the past.

-End-

TL;DR Britbong mad that Shrek isn't a Disney film, probably

(Gonna also use this thread to shill my Multimedia thread)
 

"20 years ago, the other kids wouldn't let me tag along to the cinema with them, called me names , said I had "Shrek Neck" and Mom said there wasn't anything we could do..... well.... today?

I WILL HAVE MY REVENGE!


Hey! Where you going? Aren't you gonna let me revenge?
 
"What’s left is an all-ages film that’s somehow more crude and juvenile in its appeals to adults than children."

Gonna have to agree with this part, this is bad, not just shrek but other movies too. Forced and "subtle" sex/naughty word/dudeweed/old pop culture etc references are only funny to lowest common denominator retard adults and they're just stupid to kids who would probably appreciate that time being filled with kids stuff.

Also Eddie Murphy (or other past good comics) went family safe imo tainting him and anything he touches. If coming to america was the safest thing he'd ever done I'd have a lot more respect. Get some generic studio voice for characters in a kids movie, the kids don't care.
 
"Worse yet, it encouraged a destructive, know-it-all attitude toward the classics that made any earnest engagement with them seem like a waste of time. Those once-upon-a-times were now rendered stodgy and lame, literally toilet paper."

Yeah, let's go back to the innocent fairytales where princesses kiss frogs to turn them into princes. Oh wait, that version was due to victorian censorship. In the original she got the frog to turn into a prince by dashing its brains out against the wall. Or maybe you'd prefer the original version of Snow White where they kill the witch by locking her in red hot metal boots and watching her hop about until she dies?. And let's not even get into "The Jew Among Thorns". If you read Grimms fairytales to your average five year old they'll probably end up in therapy.
 
Shrek may not be a "great" movie by classical standards but holy fuck what is this fags problem? It was fun, it was the right amount of raunchy toilet humor that the parents taking their kids could have a few giggles too, and it had a better message than your typical animated kiddie flick. The music selection was fucking great too.

As usual when I see pieces like this written by a neckbearded overgrown fetus who was obviously robbed of testosterone in the womb, the only fitting response I can come up with beyond that is "wow, what a faggot"
 
"Worse yet, it encouraged a destructive, know-it-all attitude toward the classics that made any earnest engagement with them seem like a waste of time. Those once-upon-a-times were now rendered stodgy and lame, literally toilet paper."

Yeah, let's go back to the innocent fairytales where princesses kiss frogs to turn them into princes. Oh wait, that version was due to victorian censorship. In the original she got the frog to turn into a prince by dashing its brains out against the wall. Or maybe you'd prefer the original version of Snow White where they kill the witch by locking her in red hot metal boots and watching her hop about until she dies?. And let's not even get into "The Jew Among Thorns". If you read Grimms fairytales to your average five year old they'll probably end up in therapy.
Hey I turned out..oh...
 
Imagine just shitting on a movie that presumably more than a hundred people spent more than a year working to make that was popular both among audiences and critics. I watched it when I was a kid and I remember liking it.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with being a movie critic, but there's something so incredibly off-putting about some faux-journalist, who doesn't produce anything of value, just shitting on the hard work of so many people, and for such frivolous reasons.
 
I've noticed that a lot of wannabe celeb-critics try to get famous by claiming that a movie from many years ago that most people like is actually a piece of shit.
...
That being said, I agree with the article.
Shrek came out at a perfect time, when it's style or humor was still fresh (Family Guy only had 2 seasons back then and social media didn't exist), when the snarky quippy characters were still something out of the norm in the mainstream.
Nowadays, the jokes fall flat for the most part because we're used to humor being like this and the animation aged about as well as all 20 year old CGI did.
This movie is partially responsible for a lot of the bad trends in modern US entertainment, now that I think about it.
 
Shrek is great Memes may have tainted it's legacy but fuck it's a great film. The merch for it when it came out was higher quality than anything that came afterwards. Genuinely a film that's kinda stood the test of time to a degree though some of the jokes might go over the heads of kids (that's intentional, though.)


It's a damn sight better than Toy Story. Good Lord was Andy an unfortunate looking child
View attachment 2181409
This reminds me of some shit of some shit. Toy story and Shrek had a few things in common, despite the humans in shrek looking like actual humans instead of misshapen goblin people. One of the things is how accurate the merch was to the original film's aesthetic.
There were kids toys that looked literally like the realistically textured Shrek, the kinda shit companies charge hundreds for these days. You can still get them for a decent enough price too, unless that's changed.

EDIT: HOLY SHIT I DIDN'T REALIZE THIS GUY IS USING SPACE JAM'S SHIT CONSOOM SEQUEL TO SHIT ON SHREK WHAT THE FUCK LMAO I'M DYING!
 
I remember seeing it in the theater as a kid, and I didn't like it. I did remember liking the second one though, and remember it being better-received and more successful than the first.
 
Imagine just shitting on a movie that presumably more than a hundred people spent more than a year working to make that was popular both among audiences and critics. I watched it when I was a kid and I remember liking it.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with being a movie critic, but there's something so incredibly off-putting about some faux-journalist, who doesn't produce anything of value, just shitting on the hard work of so many people, and for such frivolous reasons.
It was worked on for long enough that Chris Farely worked on it before he died, as Shrek. Some say he might have finished recording his line. It was worked on for a while.

The movie is basically a giant fuck you to Disney because they picked Michael Eisner over Jeffrey Katzenberg. He left Disney and founded Dreamworks.
 
Back