Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 608 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,595
I just wish that someday he'd actually manage to state a semi-coherent defamation case that doesn't get immediately kicked out so that Null can slap it down with a "no good reputation to defend" argument, using his own book as evidence. I mean, it claims that he is literally attacked in the street for being Russell Greer, reputations don't get worse than that. An official court ruling that he has no reputation worth defending would be devastating to his ego.
 
HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF
Screenshot_20210518-175150_Brave.jpg
20210518_175218.jpg

You know, definition of insanity and all that...
Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 16.16.36.png
1586898126180.png
 
You'd think after posting greasey selfies, boomer memes and comics and quirky thoughts about how he found a super cool flavor of coke or some sleep masks with Bluetooth speakers in them and getting no reaction or conversation out of it he would grow bored of it and try something else.

But he doesn't, just more hamfisted content to make him appear more relatable
A lot of autists are like that in that they think people want to hear what they did today or that they're somehow on the cusp of something great and will be recognized for it. It's like the Muncie Molester, James Terry Mitchell Jr, he makes videos that barely break into the double digits and thinks that his "fans" are interested in what he has to say on whatever. He's screaming into the void and nobody is really paying any attention. But just in case one person hears him he's going to continue. That's Pipsqueak. He feels that if he does this enough and drops enough hashtags that he'll suddenly get the fame and validation that he so desperately craves.
 
So how long you reckon 'till Russ begins reeeing about this on Facebook, and blaming us?
I think this bit will stay in the shadows until he loses 3-0 to Skordas. After, he can use this in place of the photo of a blurred head as an excuse as to why he lost. "Bias" judge wouldn't let him do the oral.

How is he going to explain now?

Hehe, I'd love to hear his train of though on how an oral argument would help him. He sends the court an encyclopedia of his internet history and still needs to drool and slur his way into explaining.
 
"no good reputation to defend" argument,
That's a very hard argument to win on, and courts are not eager to grant such arguments. It is usually reserved for massive criminals(for example Cardillo v. Doubleday Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1975) ). Even if every media outlet tries as hard as possible to ruin your reputation, even then it is likely to not be granted (as recently shown in NY Supreme Court case "Project Veritas vs. The New York Times Company et al" docket 131)
 

Attachments

That's a very hard argument to win on, and courts are not eager to grant such arguments. It is usually reserved for massive criminals(for example Cardillo v. Doubleday Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1975) ). Even if every media outlet tries as hard as possible to ruin your reputation, even then it is likely to not be granted (as recently shown in NY Supreme Court case "Project Veritas vs. The New York Times Company et al" docket 131)
Hey big pepper. I get that youre a legal autist and I like your insight. But maybe throw a tl:dr on these citations? Googling it just links to paywalled shit or Nerdy Lawyer Monthly articles that I am not going to read just to get a gist of Legal mumbo jumbo is worse than IT talk. Lol
 
But maybe throw a tl:dr on these citations?
Link to Cardillo v. Doubleday Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1975). The main point of it was to show where I got that "criminal" example from. In this case, the court of appeals concluded that Libel Proof label applied to the appellant because he was a "habitual criminal"

For the Veritas case I attached a doc. Tldr court told the NYT to fuck of with their media citations, and the fact that many outlets call Veritas "decetive" does not create truth, nor make Veritas liable proof.

In general, though, I do describe what I am taking about, and the citations are there to lend credence to my claims.
 
That's a very hard argument to win on, and courts are not eager to grant such arguments. It is usually reserved for massive criminals(for example Cardillo v. Doubleday Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1975) ). Even if every media outlet tries as hard as possible to ruin your reputation, even then it is likely to not be granted (as recently shown in NY Supreme Court case "Project Veritas vs. The New York Times Company et al" docket 131)
I know, but how many such cases were literally attacked by strangers in the street upon being recognized? You can't get worse than that unless strangers are killing you on sight, which tends to make it difficult to sue for defamation or anything else.
 
HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF
View attachment 2181430
View attachment 2181431

You know, definition of insanity and all that...
View attachment 2181435
View attachment 2181445

As soon as I saw this post was up on IG, I damn near broke my fingers rushing over here. I cannot wait to watch this meltdown unfold in real-time. Also why would he need a “camera person” to take a photo of that sign? If he wanted to be in the photo, self timers are a thing.
 
As soon as I saw this post was up on IG, I damn near broke my fingers rushing over here. I cannot wait to watch this meltdown unfold in real-time. Also why would he need a “camera person” to take a photo of that sign? If he wanted to be in the photo, self timers are a thing.
Russ has a boomer grasp of technology. Plus I doubt he would spring for a phone tripod to hold his phone.
 
So when she either politely declines or just doesn't respond, how do you think Russ will react? Scream about how she hates the disabled or will he jump straight to the lawsuit?
The former, I presume.
I know, but how many such cases were literally attacked by strangers in the street upon being recognized?
He still can get a job, get his songs out, work with all sorts of "companies" to "market" his songs, etc. He can live a normal life. and that would be damning to the libel proof argument (imo). Besides, being attacked upon recognized is not a sign of horrible reputation in general, more so a horrible reputation with just one group which is normal for famous people (Pelosi had alleged Hit Squads after her made up of Trump supporters, yet overall she has a decent enough reputation). While he isn't exactly famous, if he was smart, he'd make similar arguments (or the court might), to counter any such libel proof accusation.
In any case, I wouldn't personally have much hope of the libel proof label sticking.
If he wanted to be in the photo, self timers are a thing.
Because, obviously, the robot camera timer is biased against the disabled and would mess up his photo.
Plus I doubt he would spring for a phone tripod to hold his phone.
With a bit of a child level creativity, the problem is easily solved.
 
HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF
View attachment 2181430
View attachment 2181431

You know, definition of insanity and all that...
View attachment 2181435
View attachment 2181445
When he sues her,what number will that lawsuit be?( I lost count)
He spent $400.00 according to court docs he filed in the TS case on I dont get you song so I'm thinking he dropped at least that much and maybe $300.00 to 500.00 on the video knowing how much of an idiot Russtard is putting him at least close to a grand on the Yovanna song and video for whatever insane reason he has thinking he can get her. I cant wait to see how far he goes this time about her ignoring him plus No oral arguments n court will make his day really Awesome!
 
Last edited:
Back