NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus


this thread is pretty incredible
1621629819231.png

Ahh, libertarians and their fucking... *checks card* ...liberty.
 
2LyuHp8.png


Oh, a GOTY thread, let's see what it is...

HIubyH.png


mentions of depression, anxiety, suicide, heavy drug use, rape, physical assault, murder, sexual assault, torture, child abuse, anti-semitism, slurs, homophobia, racism and spiders

:stress:

ZyPxlvc.png


You're faggots that fuck animals and are usually into kids. Most folks are cool enough with the normal gays, not furries.

ncnMLJ7.png



"Where can we discuss child abuse? Is that PedoEra discord still around?"

:thinking:
 
Maybe it is my mistake for trying to rationalize ResetEra, but can someone explain to me how both the

Twitch Hot Tub Thread


And Thread Critical of Sexualized game characters


seem to have contradictory views on sexualization in general. I don't mind sexualized content in games and the Hot Tub meta, which I can at least respect the hustle, really is a big brained scheme to just get money from simps . If you tried to defend sexualized content in the video game thread it would be an instant ban. The video game stuff is a step down in my mind since they are all fake anyways.

In the earlier Hot Tub related thread where on of the big streamers got her ad revenue pulled a lot of the posters seemed upset about it and sided with the streamer. This also seems to go against the usual phrase on ResetEra that private platforms are free to do as they wish (usually referring to Twitter, Facebook, etc. bans on usually right wing figures).

Can these two views be reconciled or are double standards the only standards they have?
 
Maybe it is my mistake for trying to rationalize ResetEra, but can someone explain to me how both the

Twitch Hot Tub Thread


And Thread Critical of Sexualized game characters


seem to have contradictory views on sexualization in general. I don't mind sexualized content in games and the Hot Tub meta, which I can at least respect the hustle, really is a big brained scheme to just get money from simps . If you tried to defend sexualized content in the video game thread it would be an instant ban. The video game stuff is a step down in my mind since they are all fake anyways.

In the earlier Hot Tub related thread where on of the big streamers got her ad revenue pulled a lot of the posters seemed upset about it and sided with the streamer. This also seems to go against the usual phrase on ResetEra that private platforms are free to do as they wish (usually referring to Twitter, Facebook, etc. bans on usually right wing figures).

Can these two views be reconciled or are double standards the only standards they have?
Banned: Repeated Offenses
 
seem to have contradictory views on sexualization in general. I don't mind sexualized content in games and the Hot Tub meta, which I can at least respect the hustle, really is a big brained scheme to just get money from simps . If you tried to defend sexualized content in the video game thread it would be an instant ban. The video game stuff is a step down in my mind since they are all fake anyways.

There is no rationalization for it, it's just out-and-out hypocrisy and double standards. If the objectification of women is demeaning and harmful, then it shouldn't matter whether or not the woman being objectified is an imaginary videogame/anime character or just a Twitch streamer jiggling for the camera. There's really no logical way to explain the contradiction.

I'm sure they would say, "Yeah but this is a woman using her body to make sweet sweet money!," as if that's somehow more upstanding than a talented artist who draws and creates sexy characters. On a forum full of anti-capitalists, it is surprising how often "making money" ends up being an excuse for all kinds of behavior they would otherwise find reprehensible.
 
zypxlvc-png.2190951

Yes, your visceral reaction to furries must be homophobia! Because it certainly couldn't be their repulsive lust to rape cute, defenseless, little animals that grosses other people out.

ETA: The slippery slope is not a fallacy, people.
 
Last edited:
Yes, your visceral reaction to furries must be homophobia! Because it certainly couldn't be their repulsive lust to rape cute, defenseless, little animals that grosses other people out.

ETA: The slippery slope is not a fallacy, people.
So then the religious right was correct that gay marriage would lead to a man marrying a dog?

Just give me a fucking rainbow wig and unicycle at this point lol.
 
So then the religious right was correct that gay marriage would lead to a man marrying a dog?

Just give me a fucking rainbow wig and unicycle at this point lol.
Jerry Springer had a man who married a horse on his show once... Eh, we've starting going down that path a long time ago, hahaha.

Also, Obligatory: "Furries are a mistake."
 
Last edited:
Yes, your visceral reaction to furries must be homophobia! Because it certainly couldn't be their repulsive lust to rape cute, defenseless, little animals that grosses other people out.

ETA: The slippery slope is not a fallacy, people.
My visceral reaction to furries comes from the fact that despite what genderspecial tards say I absolutely refuse to believe that people who get a boner from wearing an animal-themed outfit are anything else than utter degenerates who should be gassed.

That and every time those faggots are left alone anywhere they proceed to trash the place to a degree even drug-addled hobos wouldn't manage to achieve.
 
My visceral reaction to furries comes from the fact that despite what genderspecial tards say I absolutely refuse to believe that people who get a boner from wearing an animal-themed outfit are anything else than utter degenerates who should be gassed.

That and every time those faggots are left alone anywhere they proceed to trash the place to a degree even drug-addled hobos wouldn't manage to achieve.
Since the beginnings of the furry community there was a overlap between them and faggots.
 
Update from GAF

The mods are making more negative xbox threads disappear.

This is the second deleted thread this week that showed sales stats of the consoles (MS has only sold through 1.3 million vs PS5 at 2.8 million).

I am adamant that a sale of Neogaf to a bigger player is imminent.
 
zypxlvc-png.2190951

Yes, your visceral reaction to furries must be homophobia! Because it certainly couldn't be their repulsive lust to rape cute, defenseless, little animals that grosses other people out.

ETA: The slippery slope is not a fallacy, people.

hajoYBb.png


This is real and it was made by the furry community.
 
GAF and REE are run by hierarchy and I'm not talking about the mods.

Power users on those sites have all the sway, if you offend one, you're banned.

So fucking gay
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lemmiwinks
Can these two views be reconciled or are double standards the only standards they have?
Opportunists are gonna be opportunists.

They have no ideological core and they're their own worst contradiction.

Jerry Springer had a man who married a horse on his show once... Eh, we've starting going down that path a long time ago, hahaha.
Yeah but Jerry Springer was fake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back