Conrad Aaron Collins / Diginée / Digibro / Digibrony / Otaku Gonzo Journalism & the Pro Crastinators Podcast - Pedophile, Two-Faced Weeaboo Ponyfag Youtube Analyst Who Wants to be a Loli + Drama, Friends & Enemies

that honestly what it is anitube was so fucking garbage at the time. nobody could call him on his bullshit.

who would debate him misty chronexia
forneverworld ?
What about DEMOLITION D+/DouchebagChocolat?

Anitube c. 2013 may not have had quantity in terms of channels but there certainly was quality.

Speaking of quality, Conrad has privatised his "Getting Interesting Answers To Questions" video, 20 May 2021, as one can see from my last post with the now dead Youtube link, and reuploaded it (21 May 2021) in order to, in his own words, "fix spelling errors", particularly "interconnected" (originally spelt incorrectly as "interconneceted"), as can be seen from both the thumbnail of the first upload of the video:
unknown.png

and in the archived video I provided in my last post.

[EDIT: Here is both the reuploaded video and its 360p archived form:
]

Spelling mistakes can happen, but surely after more than a decade of writing experience under this belt, he would proofread his work better?
 
Last edited:
Spelling mistakes can happen, but surely after more than a decade of writing experience under this belt, he would proofread his work better?
I'm going to pin that one on his editor. Honestly, you can't expect better from someone willing to work for free for 2021 Digi, and I bet he just uploaded the video as soon as he received it without giving it a second look.
 
I'm going to pin that one on his editor. Honestly, you can't expect better from someone willing to work for free for 2021 Digi, and I bet he just uploaded the video as soon as he received it without giving it a second look.
I thought that at first if the editor was in any way at fault but both Davoo in the past and now the current one (Napsy) are primarily video editors; for all we know, Conrad just gives the script as it is written to his editor, who solely concerns themselves with video editing and relies on Conrad giving them the text without any errors.
 
I thought that at first if the editor was in any way at fault but both Davoo in the past and now the current one (Napsy) are primarily video editors; for all we know, Conrad just gives the script as it is written to his editor, who solely concerns themselves with video editing and relies on Conrad giving them the text without any errors.
True, but the script's just the article and "interconnected" is written correctly there, unless Digi also corrected it at a later point. What I don't get is how you can fuck up copy-pasting the text when making that title and thumbnail.
 
Well, who saw it coming?
View attachment 2194501
Keep this (barely two months old) nugget in consideration:
E2EjQhwWQAE0jjg.png

Someone in reply muses on the idea of legal action in terms of unfulfilled Kickstarter promises (see the attachments attached to this post):
Kickstarter Legal Action.png

Imagine you grift over 34k dollars from retards to fund world communism but when you look away for a second a hobo in drags smokes it all away.
I've brought up before in this thread how the likes of Patreons, as well as Kickstarter and Indiegogo campaigns, only offer promises of a product to those donating; there isn't the strong notion that a concrete product is being bought as a transaction by customers.

Straightd0pe, an early 2010s critic of TheAmazingAtheist, made an excellent video on this subject, where the latter wanted $20,000 for his Indiegogo-funded project, Not Productive; some free speech alternative to Youtube that he already tried and failed to create before. Straightd0pe pointed that out that donators ought to demand an investment when they put money into someone else's proposal, criticising the whole notion of "I have an idea, buy it for me please" (5:32):
Here is the 360 archive of it; his channel seems to have been deleted:

The PCP are a business and it should be run as such. In fairness, however, the rest of the PCP gang (particularly BASED Saint and Gibbontake) do take their fans (i.e. customers) seriously with the promises they received $10,000s for. Conrad, however, does not, or at least is dragging his feet about the fulfilled the promises (which is the story of his life as a content creator).

Thing is, if Conrad is no longer a member of the PCP, isn't he still a shareholder of it as a business? Did they buy him out? Same question could be asked of KHANTEHNT!; did Conrad take his 50% share when he quit?

EDIT: Looks like public shaming did the trick:
Gibbontake Files.PNG

Gibbontake Files 2.PNG
 

Attachments

  • Kickstarter Terms of Use (1).png
    Kickstarter Terms of Use (1).png
    9.6 KB · Views: 106
  • Kickstarter Terms of Use (2).jpg
    Kickstarter Terms of Use (2).jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 97
Last edited:
Keep this (barely two months old) nugget in consideration:
View attachment 2194733
Someone in reply muses on the idea of legal action in terms of unfulfilled Kickstarter promises (see the attachments attached to this post):
View attachment 2194741

I've brought up before in this thread how the likes of Patreons, as well as Kickstarter and Indiegogo campaigns, only offer promises of a product to those donating; there isn't the strong notion that a concrete product is being bought as a transaction by customers.

Straightd0pe, an early 2010s critic of TheAmazingAtheist, made an excellent video on this subject, where the latter wanted $20,000 for his Indiegogo-funded project, Not Productive; some free speech alternative to Youtube that he already tried and failed to create before. Straightd0pe pointed that out that donators ought to demand an investment when they put money into someone else's proposal, criticising the whole notion of "I have an idea, buy it for me please" (5:32):
Here is the 360 archive of it; his channel seems to have been deleted:
View attachment 2194759
The PCP are a business and it should be run as such. In fairness, however, the rest of the PCP gang (particularly BASED Saint and Gibbontake) do take their fans (i.e. customers) seriously with the promises they received $10,000s for. Conrad, however, does not, or at least is dragging his feet about the fulfilled the promises (which is the story of his life as a content creator).

Thing is, if Conrad is no longer a member of the PCP, isn't he still a shareholder of it as a business? Did they buy him out? Same question could be asked of KHANTEHNT!; did Conrad take his 50% share when he quit?

EDIT: Looks like public shaming did the trick:
View attachment 2194817
View attachment 2194818
Realistically the PCP was/is a general partnership where everyone had equal shares, but their value is zero so buying out them is pointless
 
Can you imagine anyone, ever, wanting to purchase part of the 'ownership' of the PCP? No.
If it's a profitable business, then yes, I would, for example, purchase the share of an ex-partner if it meant buying them out; likewise, I would expect my share of the business' worth if I was kicked out of it.

It doesn't matter if one deems it "worthless shit"; it's still something of value if people give it value (i.e. money).
 
Last edited:
If it's a profitable business, then yes, I would, for example, purchase the share of an ex-partner if it meant buying them out; likewise, I would expect my share of the business' worth if I was kicked out of it.

It doesn't matter if one deems it "worthless shit"; it's still something of value if people give it value (i.e. money).
Thats not what I'm asking. I'm asking if anyone, outside, would ever purchase a part of 'this' business, the PCP

And no, they wouldn't.

Realistically the PCP wanted to cover their ass they should extract some sort of statement from everyone that's left them as giving up all interest in the PCP, but it will never matter.
 
Thats not what I'm asking. I'm asking if anyone, outside, would ever purchase a part of 'this' business, the PCP

And no, they wouldn't.
Not after this display, no, no they wouldn't (or shouldn't). Nor KHANTEHNT! for that matter (which is a dead business, anyway). I'm not letting the donators completely off the hook either; hence my criticism of donation campaigns, rather than a forthcoming promised product that can be purchased by customers only when it is complete.

A fool and his money are soon parted, after all.
 
Neither of them can afford a lawyer so it kind of doesnt matter in the end tbh
I mean this shit would only ever exist in small claims court anyways, they could probably get a judgement against one or the other, but enforcing that would be hell

See this is why I just keep going 'it doesn't matter', you can cite that 30k number but the reality is its a fraction of that because its split so many fucking ways and at some point it reaches the 'who gives a shit' number, especially since its interstate nightmares.
 
In times like these I like to think back to when Digi publicly shamed Endless Jess into completing Pleeb and the Weebs editing. Very fitting that this happened.
Also, all of the shows announced and performed so far are in Elko Nevada, are the Yggers relying on the goodwill of one guy in bumfuck nowhere for liveshows? Maybe thats the "big money" they mentioned.
 
In times like these I like to think back to when Digi publicly shamed Endless Jess into completing Pleeb and the Weebs editing. Very fitting that this happened.
Also, all of the shows announced and performed so far are in Elko Nevada, are the Yggers relying on the goodwill of one guy in bumfuck nowhere for liveshows? Maybe thats the "big money" they mentioned.
My money is either on a record contract delusion Billy-Boy is pushing or

'YOU KNOW THAT DICK WILL HELP US OUT IN THE END? HE IS CURRENTLY LOOKING FOR THE BEST RVs IN LA AND SOON WILL GIVE US OUR OWN SHOW IN 1.5 YEARS - JUST DONT TALK ABOUT IT BEA OR IT MIGHT GET CANCELLED DUE TO THE NDAS'
 
Back