Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%

  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%

  • Null

    Votes: 1,450 55.8%

  • Kanye West

    Votes: 284 10.9%

  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%
  • Total voters
    2,598
Constellationzero said:
Yeah, I was able to save a full copy of the tard book from Google Drive. As Joshua stated, butternut needs to soo da Googlez. But even then, he'll get dickslapped when Mr. Skordas reminds the courts that this dipshit "accidentally" left his sample on Amazon as the whole thing--for more than a day, if memory serves. Personal butternut squash problems--not farm problems.
Click to expand...
The whole "he gave the entire book away for free" thing is really a nonstarter. It doesn't matter if he did; he still didn't give away the right to re-distribute it to others. Butternut needs to send the DMCA notice to Google, though. It's hosted on Google Drive.

You could perhaps, somewhat plausibly, argue that distributing a "preview" falls under fair use when it's a representative sample so that people can see what it's like (and you can have some basis to show people for your commentary/discussion about it). But when the "preview" is the entire book, and that was pretty obviously a mistake, it'd be pretty tough to argue that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Picklechu, Allakazam223, SpiceyHuman and 8 others
Radiant Orchit said:
A Russipedia would be great. Should reduce those 'read the thread' posts (not reading the OP is weak but 2000 pages a tad intimidating) and it might assist his next stalking victim/male escort/minder if the info is there in tl;dr format with links to sources.
Click to expand...
It WOULD be great, but people in the thread has proven time and time again that they absolutely refuse to read either the OP or the highlights. Like, the screenshots to the Erica saga or the TS book are linked right in the OP, and the highlight function easily removes a big portion of the shitposts. Highly doubt they'd read a Russipedia unfortunately
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Moosebonker, ConSluttant, Allakazam223 and 13 others
DrJonesHat said:
The fact that his quest is utterly hopeless because he refuses to do anything to break into the songwriting industry properly will remain hilarious for me. I loved it when someone told him he should start writing for local groups and he replied that he didn't have to because there was no law that said he did.
Click to expand...
There's no law that says he has to but when you want to get your music out there you want that kind of exposure. The whole point, if he's really passionate about becoming a musician, is to get your work out to as many people as possible. I've known professional musicians in my time and music was their life. Everything they did was to further their art. The money they'd get from it was just how they paid the bills but these guys would have continued to play even if they didn't need the money because it was for the music. It's the same for any other art form out there. You don't do it for recognition or for fame but because you have this need to do it.

Pipsqueak doesn't have that drive. It's a means to an end to get famous and to find somebody who will willingly suck him his penis. And I'm sure he'd be able to find somebody to do that if he played within his own league. Instead of going for 9's and 10's that he settle for a decent enough looking 4 who'd be willing to do the sex things with him. But he's a narcissist who thinks he's too good for that so he's aiming for the sky and can barely jump to get up there.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: WhaleOilBeefHooked, DopeaddictKitten, Cheesegirl78 and 6 others
Kosher Salt said:
The whole "he gave the entire book away for free" thing is really a nonstarter. It doesn't matter if he did; he still didn't give away the right to re-distribute it to others. Butternut needs to send the DMCA notice to Google, though. It's hosted on Google Drive.

You could perhaps, somewhat plausibly, argue that distributing a "preview" falls under fair use when it's a representative sample so that people can see what it's like (and you can have some basis to show people for your commentary/discussion about it). But when the "preview" is the entire book, and that was pretty obviously a mistake, it'd be pretty tough to argue that.
Click to expand...
Reproducing the entirety of a work is rarely fair use. However, one aspect is whether you had legitimate access to it in the first place and when the owner of the copyright distributes it for free public access, even if that's accidental, that's legitimate access.

It still isn't a license just to reproduce the entire work, though.
Phil Ken Sebben said:
There's no law that says he has to but when you want to get your music out there you want that kind of exposure.
Click to expand...
There's also no law saying you have to train if you want to win a marathon. But you won't if you don't.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Picklechu, DopeaddictKitten, Phil Ken Sebben and 8 others
Phil Ken Sebben said:
There's no law that says he has to but when you want to get your music out there you want that kind of exposure. The whole point, if he's really passionate about becoming a musician, is to get your work out to as many people as possible. I've known professional musicians in my time and music was their life. Everything they did was to further their art. The money they'd get from it was just how they paid the bills but these guys would have continued to play even if they didn't need the money because it was for the music. It's the same for any other art form out there. You don't do it for recognition or for fame but because you have this need to do it.

Pipsqueak doesn't have that drive. It's a means to an end to get famous and to find somebody who will willingly suck him his penis. And I'm sure he'd be able to find somebody to do that if he played within his own league. Instead of going for 9's and 10's that he settle for a decent enough looking 4 who'd be willing to do the sex things with him. But he's a narcissist who thinks he's too good for that so he's aiming for the sky and can barely jump to get up there.
Click to expand...
All that is for lesser mortals. Russ doesn't need to go through all those steps because he's special, don't you understand? Expecting him to act like a normal person is discrimination dammit!
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: kartana, DopeaddictKitten, Phil Ken Sebben and 4 others
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Winner
Reactions: Caecia, cromit, Empyrea and 23 others
Kosher Salt said:
The whole "he gave the entire book away for free" thing is really a nonstarter. It doesn't matter if he did; he still didn't give away the right to re-distribute it to others. Butternut needs to send the DMCA notice to Google, though. It's hosted on Google Drive.

You could perhaps, somewhat plausibly, argue that distributing a "preview" falls under fair use when it's a representative sample so that people can see what it's like (and you can have some basis to show people for your commentary/discussion about it). But when the "preview" is the entire book, and that was pretty obviously a mistake, it'd be pretty tough to argue that.
Click to expand...
Y’know no matter what the DMCA and Copyright law says about this, it’s going to require putting the books full title in front of the Judge in your current lawsuit. “Why I sued Taylor Swift and how I became “falsely” known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy”. That’s just never gonna work in your favor. No matter how you try and spin it. When the copyrighted work you are suing people over is your deranged autobiographical manifesto about how you abuse the court system, and clearly says this in the title, the Judge is guaranteed to get a bit pissy over the whole thing.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AbraCadaver, Moosebonker, Allakazam223 and 13 others
RodgerDodger said:
Y’know no matter what the DMCA and Copyright law says about this, it’s going to require putting the books full title in front of the Judge in your current lawsuit. “Why I sued Taylor Swift and how I became “falsely” known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy”. That’s just never gonna work in your favor. No matter how you try and spin it. When the copyrighted work you are suing people over is your deranged autobiographical manifesto about how you abuse the court system, and clearly says this in the title, the Judge is guaranteed to get a bit pissy over the whole thing.
Click to expand...
Even a cursory glance at the book will reveal that Russ thinks the law is for settling personal vendettas. It will also reveal that he has no idea what he's doing and he knows juuuuust enough to a be a colossal pest. His filings should be included in law school books as a textbook example of a frivolous lawsuit. Russ himself should be included in abnormal psychology textbooks. He alone is enough material for a dissertation.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, Picklechu, BULLY HUNTER_77 and 11 others
DrJonesHat said:
Even a cursory glance at the book will reveal that Russ thinks the law is for settling personal vendettas. It will also reveal that he has no idea what he's doing and he knows juuuuust enough to a be a colossal pest. His filings should be included in law school books as a textbook example of a frivolous lawsuit. Russ himself should be included in abnormal psychology textbooks. He alone is enough material for a dissertation.
Click to expand...

Hell, for that matter, Russell's antics and postings should be used as primary sources in mandatory online etiquette courses. Online etiquette and don't tard out on the internet 101 should be mandatory starting in middle school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, Picklechu, DopeaddictKitten and 7 others
Constellationzero said:
Hell, for that matter, Russell's antics and postings should be used as primary sources in mandatory online etiquette courses. Online etiquette and don't tard out on the internet 101 should be mandatory starting in middle school.
Click to expand...
internet access should be locked behind an internet license, similar to drivers licenses and firearms licenses in countries that have them
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Ghjkl63, AbraCadaver and 12 others
Go for it dude, Yovanna won't mind!

20210525_214225.png
 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: snoot booper, Ghjkl63, CallMeDoctorWerm and 34 others
Panda788 said:
I haven't been able to properly catch up with all the pages of Russel's adventures, might I ask if he already chimp out about Yovanna not getting back to him?
Click to expand...
No, he has not. Most users are holding out for something spectacular, but I don't think he's gonna do much beyond piss and moan on Facebook.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Filbert, Allakazam223, The Un-Clit and 6 others
Drowningman said:
When retards lolsuit against NULL gets thrown out by the Judge,I hope we see him go on a rampage.
Has anyone ever seen his crying to Taylor Swift video?
Word is its totaly gone but he put a screen cap of it in his book.
Click to expand...

I think you're thinking about the video where Russ is addressing the troll pretending to be Katy Perry's assistant. The one where he bawls about his parents pushing him. That's the only crying video I'm aware of.

StinkySnack said:
Too bad his mom didn't.
Click to expand...

Sure she did. She put him up for adoption.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: AngelOfDeath, Filbert, Medical Hawaii and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back