- Joined
- Mar 15, 2019
There are some anomalies regarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology during 2019 that should absolutely be looked into.
In September 2019, their online database of viruses went offline, Changes were made to the description of the database on December 30th 2019, the day the outbreak was made public.
(PDF) An investigation into the WIV databases that were taken offline
PDF | On the 12th Sep 2019, the main database of samples and viral sequences of the Wuhan Institute of Virology went offline. Eventually every single of... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
www.researchgate.net
An anonymous report shows decreased traffic and cell phone usage in the vicinity of the WIV in October 2019.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
US intelligence report, the one released just days before Biden took office, claimed that WIV researchers fell ill in "autumn of 2019". Just recently it was disclosed that 3 researchers sought hospitalization in November 2019.
The Daily Mail, I know, but this claims that the wife of a researcher fell ill on November 14th 2019 and died later that month, as well as someone who became ill in September and later died.
This suggests a lab leak possibly in August or September of 2019 that was not addressed at the WIV until October, and the virus was circulating in the area until it started to spread in the general population in November, and experienced exponential growth in late November-early December with the notorious wet market being the first "superspreader" event. This could explain both the fact that many of the earliest confirmed cases were not connected to the wet market, and that the virus had already mutated enough to spread easily in humans as the genomic sequences of the earliest cases show a similar affinity to human cells as SARS-CoV-1 had in 2003, after it had already been spreading unchecked for months. I think that may be why some people latched onto the whole bioweapon angle early on because it seemed like it was primed to infect humans from the get-go, but it might have been just circulating long enough to adapt better to humans, if any of the strange goings-on at the WIV are anything to go by.
It could also explain this sudden about-face from the scientific community about the lab leak hypothesis being a possibility. Some people who definitely are familiar with the WIV, gain-of-function research, coronaviruses and Shi Zhengli (batwoman) are the ones subtly showing their support of looking into this--Fauci, Ralph Baric, Ian Lipkin, et al--which could either be them trying to downplay their involvement with the CCP or them getting the details of what actually was going on at the WIV and the Wuhan CDC--which, compared to the WIV, is a stone's throw away from the wet market that they tried desperately to pin the virus on.
There's more circumstantial stuff that suggests the WIV royally fucked up and tried to save their asses in the last few months of 2019 just like all the scientists and hospitals did back in the OG SARS outbreak so they wouldn't receive the ire of the Party. One thing to remember is that a lab leak doesn't necessarily have to be nefarious which often puts it into tinfoil hat territory--some retard could have dropped a vial or could have been bitten by an infected animal and didn't say anything about it until it was too late. And because we know the #1 rule is to save face, they would never admit to a mistake without trying their damnedest to fix it or cover it up before they get sent to the reeducation camp.
Last edited:
