- Joined
- Dec 8, 2020
This is really gay, but I also have some doubts because Riley comes across as an unreliable source. Put all of these faggots in timeout, Jack.
Documenting Ethan Oliver Ralph's Flagging History - 30 DMCA takedowns in ONE DAY during Ralph's "Lisbon 5 star holiday". (Last updated on 05/20/2022)
- Thread starter Bob Barker
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
Mudane Ralph the fat alcoholic flaggot strikes again, this time it's home: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/ethan-ralph-illegally-files-dmca-takedown-notice.88033/
I don't think the one from May 11, 2020 is on here. It's the one where I caught him out flagging a streamer, I think it was PhantomOrganization:
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2018
TeaClips is now claiming that Ralph got her entire YouTube channel removed due to him filing DMCA complaints against her.
EDIT: He is now fully taking responsibility and threatening to get her kicked off of Odysee.
EDIT: He is now fully taking responsibility and threatening to get her kicked off of Odysee.
Last edited:
So no copyright excuse, hes just saying clips are off the table and admitting to be a thin skinned little flaggot who cant handle people bullying his dead whore of a mom, well guess what ralph its going to get a whole lot worse for you there because of your retarded actions and using your dead skank mom as a shield.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2019
Keranu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2021
What a shitty move. Ralph flagging someone on a platform that he himself has already been banned from, and doing it from his ex-wife's account. He's a massive primadonna bitch.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
Ralph does have a bit more of a case to be had for this one, he's putting his shit behind a pay wall. If teaclips was making commentary or taking a small part out to talk about there wouldn't be more of a case to be had. Taking 40 mins out of a 2 hour paid show is a different story. Unlike ralph flagging down Null for talking over him ralph does have more of a case this time, due to the lack of it being “transformative” or for it being to "criticize, or for parody" as covered under fair use. I'm sure that teaclips will counter this claim but I'm interested if the gunt will try to take her to court over it.
Last edited:
CeeShape
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
before it does go from socialblade i will link a archive below for history purposes
summary ¦ archive
detailed statistics ¦ archive
summary ¦ archive
detailed statistics ¦ archive
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Disagree.
In Benjamin v. Hughes, the Judge claimed that simply re-uploading the footage on Sargon's YouTube channel constituted a transformation of the work.
You/Ralph would argue that Tea Clip's channel is less inherently critical than Sargon's. You'd be right, but Ralph might disagree.
In the underlined section, Ralph characterizes Tea Clip's channel and upload style as "anti-Ralph" (inherently critical). He also gives her explicit and irrevocable (his word) permission to use footage from his show.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2016
I was curious if this thread had been made, wanted to see how many he has flagged by now. Good to see it has a thread.
And even if he changed his mind at a later date, he struck down content from 2016 and 2018, 2-4 years before this message and them having beef even happened.
And he is also not taking it down because he is gonna put up his own version or full archive, he is stating he is going to directly rip the videos she has made and post them behind his paywall. A lot of people think clipping is easy, and it is, but it does take a lot of time and dedication to keep up with shit that is happening and actually cut it. As someone who makes supercuts and what is basically just overrated clips with filters, it does worry me that he is given a pass if not directly celebrated because they don't like TeaClips. My channel could be next. Who knows
I would agree if it wasn't for Ralph giving permission for TeaClips to do what she was doing
And even if he changed his mind at a later date, he struck down content from 2016 and 2018, 2-4 years before this message and them having beef even happened.
And he is also not taking it down because he is gonna put up his own version or full archive, he is stating he is going to directly rip the videos she has made and post them behind his paywall. A lot of people think clipping is easy, and it is, but it does take a lot of time and dedication to keep up with shit that is happening and actually cut it. As someone who makes supercuts and what is basically just overrated clips with filters, it does worry me that he is given a pass if not directly celebrated because they don't like TeaClips. My channel could be next. Who knows
CeeShape
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
The comment made was on newer clippings and was the latest copyright strikes about older stuff so not on about the clips he striked
he has before said he was ok with those clippings. he could change his mind which is why he striked them now
no i am not giving the defense i am just giving a comment on what might be ?
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2016
Giving permission and then later changing your mind without warning and striking videos retroactively so the channel is deleted for the obvious stated goal of having the clips removed so he himself can steal the very same clips, that he didn't make, and upload them behind a paywall is still borderline illegal imo. Tho nobody is gonna go to court about it so it is what it is.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
Ralph in the past at least pretended to have the same position as Metokur when it came to clips, that anyone could upload clips of his show and he would not care.
Even going so far as to being OK with entire episodes being reuploaded.
When Tonka went insane and deleted all Kumite episodes and started taking down clips, Ralph criticized that.
It would have been one thing to publicly state that he is no longer OK with clips being uploaded, but he went directly for flagging because he knew it would take down the channel.
His show is not and has not been a "paid" show, it's not like he does a few "free" episodes a week and the rest are only accessible behind a paywall (the typical model for shows doing that), suddenly changing his mind about what he has said (or at least pretended) is OK for years and flagging every video he could is a shitty move no matter how you look at it.
Him putting archives behind a paywall is one thing, but taking down all other clips and archives on YouTube is a pathetic move made out of anger that will only hurt him in the end because it means less exposure (even if it is critical of him).
I hope TC files a counter claim, Ralph does not have the energy or money to pursue his claims. And if he uploads her clips, I hope she DMCAs him (I think she used to edits the clips somewhat no? Enough to at least file the DMCA and let it sort itself out later).
Even going so far as to being OK with entire episodes being reuploaded.
When Tonka went insane and deleted all Kumite episodes and started taking down clips, Ralph criticized that.
It would have been one thing to publicly state that he is no longer OK with clips being uploaded, but he went directly for flagging because he knew it would take down the channel.
His show is not and has not been a "paid" show, it's not like he does a few "free" episodes a week and the rest are only accessible behind a paywall (the typical model for shows doing that), suddenly changing his mind about what he has said (or at least pretended) is OK for years and flagging every video he could is a shitty move no matter how you look at it.
Him putting archives behind a paywall is one thing, but taking down all other clips and archives on YouTube is a pathetic move made out of anger that will only hurt him in the end because it means less exposure (even if it is critical of him).
I hope TC files a counter claim, Ralph does not have the energy or money to pursue his claims. And if he uploads her clips, I hope she DMCAs him (I think she used to edits the clips somewhat no? Enough to at least file the DMCA and let it sort itself out later).
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
But that case with Sargon was in the UK, surely a US judge might not come to the same ruling. Does the fact the stream was Paywalled not play into it?
Could he make the case that KillStreamTV is different? and that one shouldn't make clips of it because it's meant to be something you buy into where as the old show was free.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2018
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
lol, anglos. Copyright law is handled entirely in the US. No other country matters. Do you think the DMCA is a UN thing or what? It's US law. This is Hughes v. Benjamin in the District Court, S.D. New York.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
I was under the impression that it was streamed under killstream.tv a service costing 8 bucks a month to see the stream. But if I'm misinformed and it was being streamed on a free platform then yeah ralph would have even less of a case.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
Ethan has never streamed on killstream.tv yet.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
Tequila Sunrise is streamed to Odysee. It's the replays taken from Odysee he's putting onto killstream.tv (even though he said they were exclusive to Odysee as part of a secret exclusivity deal he had with them). He originally stated the replays would go on killstream.tv the same day, then Odysee the next day; he then revised that to Odysee on the following weekend, and only today stated they'd never even go on Odysee at all. I just made a detailed post about how Ethan is ripping off Odysee the other day that covers this issue towards the end.