- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
Who cares if it was paywalled? He grifts off Tucker clips. Flagging is gay. I don't give a shit about her feud with a couple fat sweaty men. If you look at the videos he flagged, they were from many years ago when Gunt held the position of "clipping is fine, I dun giv a shat". He went from that to flagging transformative streams of his bullshit Patreon verbal gay porn with gaydur (MATI), to now seething about a paywall. Who wants to have their ads injected on a pig's stream anyway?ut that case with Sargon was in the UK, surely a US judge might not come to the same ruling. Does the fact the stream was Paywalled not play into it?
Would it be Ralph's right to flag the entire board because we clip his rubbish without commentary too? It's not monetised, but he can make a case of BATs being gained if he's desperate.
Not sure about Sargon's case, but DMCA is a dumb burger thing, so the ruling was definitely made in America, the UK can give less of a shit.
Respectfully disagree.
Updated the thread to include @Unog2's findings and the sweeping of @Fslur.