StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Mainly chronologically. While there was probably always anti white sentiment in the UN. The active organised push against white people seems to come around the 2000s, with the rise of big tech and globalism.

But I'd be interested to hear people's opinions on when it started.
Good question. I'll hazard my best guess and welcome criticism.

I'd say it started in the 1930s with trotsky's writing denouncing slavic ethnonationalism (slavophiles) and promotion of the new term "racism".

"White people" is just the new symbolic placeholder for uprooting a country and turning it over to internationalist masters.

--
Stonetoss-invasive-species-comic.png

--

One of the things that never ceases to surprise me, is that when you really dig into the roots of words and its initial people and goals, it's rarely some egalitarian noble thing that we believe it to be, like racism is only about prejudice not privilege+power, and feminism is only about equality, and transgender is okay but some vocal insufferables, but the modern problems that people think are a recent change when these issues were right there from the very beginning.


It's odd to say but the use of term racist (as differing from the formerly known "racialist") was itself racist from the get go. If you don't use the privilege+power definition that is.
 
Last edited:
Mainly chronologically. While there was probably always anti white sentiment in the UN. The active organised push against white people seems to come around the 2000s, with the rise of big tech and globalism.

But I'd be interested to hear people's opinions on when it started.
This isnt pol. This thread is for stonetoss, not white genocide and its definition. Fuck sake man, i agree that shitskins, jews and women ruin everyones fun, just stop being this threads version of a shitskin, jew or woman
 
This isnt pol. This thread is for stonetoss, not white genocide and its definition. Fuck sake man, i agree that shitskins, jews and women ruin everyones fun, just stop being this threads version of a shitskin, jew or woman
If there will be a comic worth talking about besides the "kinda funny"/"not original"/"here's the amogus" then people will talk about it.

The only other constructive thing I can say about the recent comic is that it applies far more for China than "Those Israelis". Saying a country commited genocide would have had him apologize regardless (unless it's a country lead by a right wing political figure globalists didn't like), while apologizing for saying a country exists is far more ridiculous.
 
The only other constructive thing I can say about the recent comic is that it applies far more for China than "Those Israelis".
Again, why not both?

You seem to raise redirections rather than refutations. These are usually pretty effective in conversations, but not when people can just scroll up and reread. Improve your pilpul.
 
The thing with retracting criticisms of Israel is that it only applies to the relative mainstream of the left. I'm not aware of Ilhan Omar ever really retracting most of her comments about Israel being a terrorist state other than some token comments to the effect of "not all Jews", which is basically true anyway since not all Jews support Zionism in the first place. Obviously you can't be an open anti-semite in public office but that doesn't mean the entirety of Congress goes to AIPAC meetings, especially representatives in cities with big black populations.
 
Surprised he has a thread here, though it looks even deader than Stonetoss's thread was. And that's with the arguments of whether the guy is a cow or not.
It wouldn't be IF you posted it there. Stop caring about internet stickers or engagement and commit yourself fully to documenting lolcows on the internet that interest you!
 
Back