Yeah, as soon as I heard "Andrea James" I remembered the first time I read about him on Wikipedia
View attachment 2216318
I would think that even in the trans activist community, calling an adversary's (the book isn't even anti-trans, it's quite sympathetic) underage daughter a "cock-starved exhibitionist" and posting photos of her on your website would get you ostracized. But apparently not. Apparently daring to believe in AGP is such a heinous thing to do that it's OK for a full-grown adult to sexually harass your young daughter.
View attachment 2216346
(
archive, as you might imagine he eventually got rid of it. Even this isn't the original as the backlash did at least force James to replace the photos with photos of himself as a child)
His justification is that apparently calling a child "a cock-starved exhibitionist who's especially well suited to prostitution... or a fetishist who just gets off on the idea of it" is equivalent to Bailey saying "Extremely feminine gays like this later work as waiters, hairdressers, receptionists, strippers, and prostitutes, as well as in many other occupations". Ignoring the actual context of the real Bailey quote, the fake quote is orders of magnitude worse. And even if Bailey had said something nearly as vile as what James came up with, it
still wouldn't justify this.
But of course, James is still the real victim in this, because Bailey dared to talk about how revolting it was for him to target his daughter and that actually is even worse than posting pictures of a child with the caption "A cock-starved exhibitionist".
View attachment 2216405