CN “We can’t afford it”: Chinese internet users have rejected Beijing’s new three-child policy

“We can’t afford it”: Chinese internet users have rejected Beijing’s new three-child policy​

Two women and their babies pose for photographs in front of the giant portrait of late Chinese chairman Mao Zedong on the Tiananmen Gate in Beijing November 2, 2015. China must continue to enforce its one-child policy until new rules allowing all couples to have two children go into effect, the top family planning body said. The ruling Communist Party said last week that Beijing would loosen its decades-old one-child policy. The plan for the change must be approved by the rubber-stamp parliament during its annual session in March.

REUTERS/KIM KYUNG-HOON
Not that easy to control.
FROM OUR OBSESSION
Because China
China is striving for global leadership, and has the economic clout to realize its vision.
  • Jane Li
By Jane Li
China tech reporter
May 31, 2021
China announced today (May 31) that it will allow married couples to have up to three children, a further relaxation of population restrictions after it abandoned the one-child policy in 2015 due to its shrinking birth rate. But the Chinese internet quickly—and overwhelmingly—vetoed the new proposal.

A top comment under state-run news agency Xinhua’s post about the new policy simply said “Bah!” It was liked nearly 80,000 times.

The decision came out of a Politburo meeting chaired by Chinese president Xi Jinping at which the country’s top decision-making body decided the new policy would ”improve the structure of China’s population, implement the national strategy of actively responding to the aging population, and maintaining China’s human resource advantages,” according to Xinhua. A hashtag about the news was viewed over 1.7 billion times on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, within hours of the announcement. The government hasn’t said when the policy will take effect.

The move highlights the Communist Party’s deep worries about the country’s declining birthrate. Census figures show only 12 million babies were born in 2020 in China, the lowest level since 1961. Meanwhile, China is set to have over 300 million people aged 60 or above by 2025, according to the government, meaning the gap between those contributing to the pension system and those withdrawing from it will keep getting wider.

But the new policy is unlikely to be any more successful than the previous move to a two-child policy.

After a brief bump, the earlier relaxation couldn’t reverse the country’s shrinking births. That’s because China’s birthrate reflects systemic issues—including the difficult of paying for top-notch education and the unequal burden of childcare that falls on women. As a result, having more than one child—or even one—is out of reach for many young people today.


“Honestly, what people need are substantial benefits such as subsidies [for having children], not those superficial encouragements. People don’t want to have children not because the absence of a three-children policy, but because we can’t afford it,” wrote a user on Weibo.

A comment that was upvoted nearly 200,000 times urged the government to provide “the most fundamental maternity welfare and solve the unfair treatment women face at the workplace for giving birth.”

Both comments, and several other similar critical posts, quickly disappeared. Instead, the comments section under the Xinhua post has been filled with more positive responses, including “we passionately support the country’s new policy!”

Officials nodded to the broader concerns in today’s decision, saying that China should develop an inclusive childcare service system, and provide a range of high-quality educational resources to reduce costs for families. The Party also vowed to improve the maternity leave and insurance system, housing affordability, and protect the rights of women at the workplace, where employers often discriminate against women in hiring because of worries they’ll take maternity leave.
But these, of course, are hard to change quickly, and require funding. As a result Beijing keeps trying top-down ways of addressing the problem and issuing new policies, including setting up special economical wedding zones to crack down on bride prices and address a related issue: the plunging marriage rate.

Some Chinese youngsters are responding to the pressure of finding their footing at work and in life by adopting a philosophy of “lying flat“—which advocates opting out of the never-ending rat race and making minimal effort in life, including giving up on having children or forming a family.

“We don’t even have time to date anyone, how could we have time to have children? 996 is the best birth control, don’t they understand?” said one comment, referring to work hours of 9am-9pm six days a week that many employers demand. “Increasing the birth rate cannot be achieved by relaxing control on having children, but by giving people the time to have relationships and live a good life!”
A poem titled “The life of a leek”—a slang word that refers to naive people exploited by scams—that made the rounds today sums up the collective feeling of fatigue that met today’s announcement.
One family
two partners
give birth to three children
while taking care of four elderly
go to work at 8am
sign off at 9pm
make 10 times the effort
to pay off a mortgage of millions

Article archive
 
Last edited:
“We don’t even have time to date anyone, how could we have time to have children? 996 is the best birth control, don’t they understand?” said one comment, referring to work hours of 9am-9pm six days a week that many employers demand. “Increasing the birth rate cannot be achieved by relaxing control on having children, but by giving people the time to have relationships and live a good life!”
A poem titled “The life of a leek”—a slang word that refers to naive people exploited by scams—that made the rounds today sums up the collective feeling of fatigue that met today’s announcement.
Communist Utopia everyone
 
The logic behind this is trying to make sure girls are born, because the problem of the one child policy was that boys were given priority over girls for inheritance. However, what does adding onto that by allowing more people to have more kids do? Nothing! Nothing is going to change when boys are still more important then girls, even if you have the option to have three kids, what's to even say a family is not going to just have them all be boys?
 
If you don’t think you can afford it, just don’t have that extra child?
Don’t see why you have to limit your laws you silly billys.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
上联:一个家庭,二个夫妻,生三个孩子,养四个老人。
下联:八点上班,晚九下班,费十分力气,还百万房贷。
横批:韭菜的一生

Shanghai United: One family, two husbands and wives, have three children and raise four elderly people.
Xialian: Go to work at eight o'clock and leave work at nine in the evening. It takes a lot of effort to repay a million mortgage.
Streamer: leek life
Either this translates poorly or the chinese are shit at poetry.
 
LMAO not even that much, China has a lopsided sex population of something absurd like 4 men to every 1 woman.

It's not that bad. Before they scrapped the one child policy it was about 118 males per 100 female newborns, but that's still the most imbalanced ratio in the world.

The other problem is that it's expected for Chinese men to marry a woman who is equal or lower in social status, which is next to impossible for the uggos or the poor. Their best chance is to marry a foreigner, result being a trafficking trade with Vietnamese women in order to arrange a marriage. Then there's also the scammer groups who'll sell brides to men, who after a couple weeks will sneak out and be sold to another man in a different village. Repeat ad infinitum.
 
Lack of maternity benefits and the high cost of education don't have anything to do with low birth rates. Daycare and university are expensive and out of reach of most people even in poor, shithole countries too. It's just a fundamental tenet of human demography that development and increased living standards precipitate lower birth rates and aging populations. The exact relationship is not precisely linear, but in general it is immutable.
 
It's not that bad. Before they scrapped the one child policy it was about 118 males per 100 female newborns, but that's still the most imbalanced ratio in the world.

The other problem is that it's expected for Chinese men to marry a woman who is equal or lower in social status, which is next to impossible for the uggos or the poor. Their best chance is to marry a foreigner, result being a trafficking trade with Vietnamese women in order to arrange a marriage. Then there's also the scammer groups who'll sell brides to men, who after a couple weeks will sneak out and be sold to another man in a different village. Repeat ad infinitum.

There is also the much bigger problem of chinese women also marrying foreigners and leaving.
118 to 100 is the rate at birth but in terms of actual breeding age it gets much worse, only slightly hidden in the statistics because of how many young men either die or kill themselves as a result of their work
 
Back