Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

A reaction to the coming out
Screenshot_2021-06-04 Hexbear.png

Screenshot_2021-06-04 Hexbear(1).png

Another one
Screenshot_2021-06-04 Creator of “assigned male” comics is a “little” Mumsnet.png
 
A reaction to the coming out
View attachment 2230230

Another one
View attachment 2230236
“Providing ammunition against the trans community” is such a bullshit reason for not talking about it.

I’m not going to accuse Labelle of anything specific here, but we have a person with a bizarre and inappropriate fixation with children, who has made himself a fixture in a community where talking about sexual topics in relation to children is not seen as suspicious. He has a job in which naive people bring their children to meet him. He claims to talk to children online. He is now apparently creating an institution that will give him unlimited access to vulnerable young people. He has expressed the belief that there is nothing wrong with an adult having sex with a child. And he openly admits to a child-related kink.

There are so many red flags here. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if something really dark came out down the line. The “trans community” can suck it up and admit that not every troon is a saint, or they can act like it’s all fine and hope for the best. Hope that nothing comes out, hope no one puts two and two together. The BBC tried the latter approach with Jimmy Savile.
 
I remember on a couple of occasions when ppl brought up that he had little kids talk sexually (like there was one giving sex advice at one I think) and Sophie justifying "I was sexually active at that age" -- and has gone on to say 'he was older'

has he eve said what kind of numbers? the characters' ages he said he was sexually active at are what, about 11-13
what about the 'he was older' guy? did Sophie ever put a number on that?
 
I’m not going to accuse Labelle of anything specific here, but we have a person with a bizarre and inappropriate fixation with children, who has made himself a fixture in a community where talking about sexual topics in relation to children is not seen as suspicious. He has a job in which naive people bring their children to meet him. He claims to talk to children online. He is now apparently creating an institution that will give him unlimited access to vulnerable young people. He has expressed the belief that there is nothing wrong with an adult having sex with a child. And he openly admits to a child-related kink.

I think there's bigger problems. As a role model and influencer for kids Soph really needs to step it up and present a more positive image. His weight is simply not healthy. Now I'm not saying he should try some radical experimental stuff, but maybe just try moderate approaches that have worked for people like Sophie in the past - just eat fresh Subway sandwiches for a few months, see how that goes
 
Interesting thing about Ska Turtle. (Late, I know, I know)

But he's got painting on his shell.

This means his shell won't grow. He's forever a tiny little turtle who's shell won't expand and let him get bigger.

So, an eternal child. Which is why he looks so sad. Or punchable, one of the two. Maybe both.

Oh, and is it just me, or does Sophie make everything look punchable as shit?
 
I remember on a couple of occasions when ppl brought up that he had little kids talk sexually (like there was one giving sex advice at one I think) and Sophie justifying "I was sexually active at that age" -- and has gone on to say 'he was older'

has he eve said what kind of numbers? the characters' ages he said he was sexually active at are what, about 11-13
what about the 'he was older' guy? did Sophie ever put a number on that?
There was the lube comic
And some comments where he said he was active at 14

I also have this comic bookmarked but I can't check the comments
Edit: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/sophi...stel-sexy-times-wafflesart.17137/post-1823595

But he only discovered masturbation at 16

Molested at 12
Poutine version is lost

The older boyfriend
Colored remake not mentioning he was older
 
Last edited:
Interesting thing about Ska Turtle. (Late, I know, I know)

But he's got painting on his shell.

This means his shell won't grow. He's forever a tiny little turtle who's shell won't expand and let him get bigger.

So, an eternal child. Which is why he looks so sad. Or punchable, one of the two. Maybe both.

Oh, and is it just me, or does Sophie make everything look punchable as shit?
1622827220672.png
 
Some photos of the house
Screenshot 2021-06-04 at 22-23-58 Sophie Labelle.png

181505595_2927067204234784_5927731100613375822_n.jpg

181091964_2927066810901490_7949924873494709674_n.jpg

181833835_2927850917489746_6769798178171072069_n.jpg

179346386_2925136784427826_3332952634490866762_n.jpg

180253008_2925136794427825_5027579815583903357_n.jpg

180142907_2925139084427596_890399741753477783_n.jpg


Bonus: a selfie from New-Zealand tour on February 2020, at Kepler Track
84294135_2561909920750516_7136447878699941888_n.jpg

 
“Providing ammunition against the trans community” is such a bullshit reason for not talking about it.

I’m not going to accuse Labelle of anything specific here, but we have a person with a bizarre and inappropriate fixation with children, who has made himself a fixture in a community where talking about sexual topics in relation to children is not seen as suspicious. He has a job in which naive people bring their children to meet him. He claims to talk to children online. He is now apparently creating an institution that will give him unlimited access to vulnerable young people. He has expressed the belief that there is nothing wrong with an adult having sex with a child. And he openly admits to a child-related kink.

There are so many red flags here. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if something really dark came out down the line. The “trans community” can suck it up and admit that not every troon is a saint, or they can act like it’s all fine and hope for the best. Hope that nothing comes out, hope no one puts two and two together. The BBC tried the latter approach with Jimmy Savile.
I'll add one more red flag.

Back in my day, before all this fancy internet pornography, we had what we called pinups: sexy women posing in their sexy clothes to sexually tease young men (and if you were in the army, to give you something to think about beyond killing the other guy.)
vintage-hollywood-christmas-pin-up-girls-12.jpg
s-l1000.jpg

They exist in the modern era as well:
these-modern-pinup-boudoir-photos-will-take-your-breath-away-15.jpg
art_poster_canvas_print_home_decor_1563382473_305cd465_progressive.jpg

I think you already know what I'm about to say, but I'll say it anyway: Labelle's fetish art is the diaperfur version of pinup art.

Let's look at two of them together: two pinups and two diaper horrors.
Vintage-Pinup-Posters.jpg
vintage-halloween-pinups-14.jpg

14f3081ce2394cb135221c03754b1fcba512cd35.jpg
83e8db7687f0b977eb0d9002442719e9546f3113.jpg

A brief analysis shows me the following similarities:
  1. The coy expression on their faces. The girls are engaging in their activities with a flirtatious expression, as are the babyfurs (Labelle's shitty makes this difficult to tell, I know. But remember, in the original video he traced to pool image, the baby isn't looking over its shoulder, whereas it is in Billy's art.)
  2. The pose. Pinups (both photography and drawn) are done in a way to sexually tease the viewer. The girls are posed in a way to tease the viewer at what could be possible with them, and the babyfurs are similarly drawn to tease the viewer (if the viewer is a sick fuck) about what they are.
  3. The object of sexuality- more specifically, how it's displayed. In the more wholesome works, the girls' sexual nature is hinted at- but it's never really shown. The same goes for the diaperfurs. Before you say "but the diapers are in plain view!" remember that it's not wearing the diapers that gets Billy off- it's pretending to be the child wearing the diaper. Being a "little" is what gets Labelle going, and in his drawings that experience is hinted at- but never fully shown. "Show, don't tell" is the primary rule of pinups, and knowingly or not Labelle follows it.
  4. I'm sure there are others in Labelle's other diaperfur drawings, but that's all I care to find.
If you think I've just made Labelle out to be a tranny Shadman.... you're probably not too far off the mark.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go cry in a cold shower now.
 
Screenshot 2021-06-05 at 20-56-56 Sophie Labelle.png


Screenshot 2021-06-05 at 20-56-20 Sophie Labelle.png

 
View attachment 2234110

View attachment 2234111
The society isn't asking gays to do anything more than we ask from straights. We aren't asking you stop having sex, we aren't asking you not have wierd sex, we aren't asking not have kinks. We are asking you keep it, whatever that it might be, private exactly the same as cishets. Remember the enthusiastic consent you keep talking about? People know that this shit gets others off, and they don't want to be involved. Forcing sex on others is somewhere between being a jerk and an assault. Involving kids on this is especially creepy because they don't have tools to defend themselves.
 
View attachment 2234110

View attachment 2234111
You know, normally I find this whole “it’s a conspiracy to normalise child molestation” theory rather tiresome. But when pedo advocate Labelle starts posting about how it should be okay to introduce children to sexual practices, alarm bells start to ring.
 
The society isn't asking gays to do anything more than we ask from straights. We aren't asking you stop having sex, we aren't asking you not have wierd sex, we aren't asking not have kinks. We are asking you keep it, whatever that it might be, private exactly the same as cishets. Remember the enthusiastic consent you keep talking about? People know that this shit gets others off, and they don't want to be involved. Forcing sex on others is somewhere between being a jerk and an assault. Involving kids on this is especially creepy because they don't have tools to defend themselves.
Exactly, fetish isn’t the same as sexuality, if they want to have a fetish parade that’s fine but just make it an adult only event.
 
Back