Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
Crashing this feminism with no survivors
That really brings to mind something I've always loved.

From the get-go, the Antis have portrayed themselves as heroes. Wu compares herself to Batman, Randi's supporters label her a heroine, Quinn and Anita are "heroic." They're ever so brave and noble.

Now take a look at whom your average Gamergate supporter identifies with:

ywJHXw5.jpg


Gamergate supporters, realizing that the mainstream press will never treat them fairly cheerfully self-identify as the bad guy. The Antis and big journos alike call them evil, but GGers fucking wear their label - they put it on, they embrace it, and using that, refuse to allow the Antis to use their simple declaration of moral duality to define the situation. "Gamergate is evil and all about harassment!" The Antis scoff. GGers laugh knowingly to themselves.

The GG supporter mocks such trivialities - they embrace what the Antis call "evil" (things like meritocracy, journalistic impartiality, and the free market) because they have seen what the opposition defines as "good"- in this case an all-encompassing "safe-space" wherein openly corrupt motherfuckers living lives of unfathomable-to-most wealth and prestige use their ill-gotten lens on the public space to promote one another and their so-called "art" - shit games that nobody fucking wants, and are commercial and critical failures outside the fucking hugbox, and know it for what it is.
 
Last edited:
That really brings to mind something I've always loved.

From the get-go, the Antis have portrayed themselves as heroes. Wu compares herself to Batman, Randi's supporters label her a heroine, Quinn and Anita are "heroic." They're ever so brave and noble.

Now take a look at whom your average Gamergate supporter identifies with:

ywJHXw5.jpg


Gamergate supporters, realizing that the mainstream press will never treat them fairly cheerfully self-identify as the bad guy. The Antis and big journos alike call them evil, but GGers fucking wear their label - they put it on, they embrace it, and using that, refuse to allow the Antis to use their simple declaration of moral duality to define the situation. "Gamergate is evil and all about harassment!" The Antis scoff. GGers laugh knowingly to themselves.

The GG supporter mocks such trivialities - they embrace what the Antis call "evil" (things like meritocracy, journalistic impartiality, and the free market) because they have seen what the opposition defines as "good"- in this case an all-encompassing "safe-space" wherein openly corrupt motherfuckers living lives of unfathomable-to-most wealth and prestige use their ill-gotten lens on the public space to promote one another and their so-called "art" - shit games that nobody fucking wants, and are commercial and critical failures outside the fucking hugbox.
So #GamerGate is the ideal scenario for a game of Beast? Huh.
 
Huh, it seems the WHOIS for spacekatgal.com is finally locked down. Took 'em long enough.

The last time that record was updated was June 21, 2014.

image.jpg

Records for John's "corporate" domain and Frank's personal domain are still unchanged.

John and Frank must be so overwhelmed with terror that neither can find one minute to lock them down. Because four thousand death threats.

For sale. $12.

image.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nCBmvIb.png

I don't have the splat leak on hand, but good god was it awful. It was basically 'Otherkin are the bestest things ever and everyone from the other lines except Hunters and Demons like them. Also if Mage contradicts the otherkin's lore, ignore it and sink it.' and had people ('Heroes') who reacted negatively to the frankly monstrous and horrific characters as 'evil'.

It's a really hilarious read- basically everything wrong with New World of Darkness and modern White Wolf. A bit of googling would probably bring it up.
 

So... John. Here you say your $3K/mo in Internet begging money "funds a dedicated employee for handling harassment". This "dedicated employee", according to the above tweets, goes by the handle "@gsxoffice".

On your website, you identify this person as "Natalie O'Brien" (fairly generic name with no credentials or photo, and coincidentally has "Brien" in "her" name) and give "her" the title of "Administrator".

image.jpg

Then when you gathered up your toys and ran away the other day, this "Natalie" tweeted:

So, contrary to your claim that this "employee" is paid $3K/mo. solely for handling "harassment", we now see "Natalie" retweeting things promoting your media coverage and pleas for support for future appearances at SXSW.

Also, how is there any "harassment" to handle if you're on "an extended leave from social media"?

Seems like the team at Patreon should be made aware of your deliberate misrepresentation of how your dupes', I mean, patrons' funds are used.
 
Last edited:
that it's because she's a woman

there, that is what is wrong with the article

A woman that produces a mildly successful video game.

100.000 copies of a freegame is not mildly is a disaster

she would likely jump ship and desperately cling to whatever other movement is popular to keep face

that is what he actually did, last month he was sperging about women in tech and when people got bored of him he jumped in the BlackLivesMatter thing

also he SUSPICIOUSLY was forgetting his women in tech bullshit to advocate for TRANSSEXUAL rights

yep...
 

So... John. Here you say your $3K/mo in Internet begging money "funds a dedicated employee for handling harassment". This "dedicated employee", according to the above tweets, goes by the handle "@gsxoffice".

On your website, you identify this person as "Natalie O'Brien" (fairly generic name with no credentials or photo, and coincidentally has "Brien" in "her" name) and give "her" the title of "Administrator".


Then when you gathered up your toys and ran away the other day, this "Natalie" tweeted:

So, contrary to your claim that this "employee" is paid $3K/mo. solely for handling "harassment", we now see "Natalie" retweeting things promoting your media coverage and pleas for support for future appearances at SXSW.

Also, how is there any "harassment" to handle if you're on "an extended leave from social media"?

Seems like the team at Patreon should be made aware of your deliberate misrepresentation of how your dupes', I mean, patrons' funds are used.
Anyone who worked under Wu must be mentally strong to deal with a boss like him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back