Kevin Gibes / Kathryn Gibes / TransSalamander / RageTreb / The Green Salamander - "Am hole:" The epitomized Twitter MtF you thought was just a myth! Donate to his Transformers toy fund today!

[A Grey Cat]

Here, allow me to translate for you.

Wedge: "The subtle aquamarine twill in the Emperor's new clothes is probably the best thing about them."
Other Crazy People: "Uh, I'm sorry, how dare you suggest there is any aquamarine whatsoever in the Emperor's new clothes? That is lèse-majesté, and a crime against fashion."
Wedge: seething
OCP: dilating
All: coping

Based: the emperor has no clothes.

 

[Dangerhair]

I agree with both of you, and I don't think you're actually disagreeing with one another really. There are definitional issues with the meanings of "gay"/"lesbian"/"bisexual". Not because the literal definitions are difficult to comprehend, but because they are difficult to objectively verify and therefore to apply consistently when you're an outside observer (i.e. if you're looking at someone else and trying to label their sexuality). Sexual orientation labels are inherently labels of behavioural motivation, rather than of a behaviour (or physical feature) itself, which makes them kind of slippery to apply to others.

Spoiler: Probably no one cares but here's an essay

Sex, race, some forms of disability etc. can all be relatively easily observed by another person, and therefore (with a brushing aside of issues of e.g. intersex and mixed-race people, how we define race, etc.) they're relatively uncomplicated to ascertain. If someone says "I'm male", I can look at them and say "no you're not, you've got a vagina". Similarly, for other types of disability or mental illness, if someone says "I have ADHD" I can check their behaviour against the behavioural diagnostic criteria for ADHD and make a (reasonably) objective decision about whether they're lying or not.

If a man says "I'm straight", I cannot look at them (or their behaviour) and say "no you're not, you have sex with men", because the definition of being a straight man is not 'never having sex with men' it's 'never being attracted to men' (which is an internal state of being, and therefore inaccessible to an observer). And whilst someone's behaviour (and self-reported internal state) can be a decent proxy for their "true" internal state, it's not the same thing.

A man who has sex with men may say "I'm straight", and be telling the truth; he's only having the sex because no one else is available, and he's imagining the other man is a woman the whole time, and is genuinely unattracted to his partner but 'making do' because he's horny. A man in an identical situation with identical behaviour may say "I'm straight" and be lying; he is attracted to his parter, but is in denial about it because internalised homophobia or whatever. How do I, an outside observer with no access to his internal state, say which is the case? Do I call this man gay, despite his self-reported sexual orientation, or do I call him straight, despite his observable same-sex sexual behaviours? (There's a reason sociologists often use the term "men who have sex with men"/"MSM", especially when discussing e.g. STD risks which are linked to sexual behaviour, not sexual orientation. No one in an academic environment wants to try making this call lmao.) Similarly, a woman who has never dated another woman and is in a happy opposite-sex marriage might say "I'm bisexual" and have it be true because she is attracted to both men and women; a woman in the same situation might say "I'm bisexual" and have it be false, because she isn't actually attracted to women and just wants to look trendy to her Bay Area friends; a woman in the same situation might say "I'm straight", and be lying, because she is attracted to women but in denial about it. Again, how the fuck do I know?

In all of these cases, I as an external observer likely have some evidence available to guide me in an educated guess as to whether the person is lying or telling the truth (e.g. past behaviour, things they've said, whether they're in a homophobic environment or not), but I cannot actually say for certain. That's where the definitional issues come in - especially when, as in the cases above, the available evidence is contradictory (i.e. people saying one thing and doing another). What do we call someone who performs same-sex sex acts, denies same-sex attraction, and who we suspect may be lying? What do we call someone who does not perform same-sex sex acts, claims same-sex attraction, and who we suspect might be lying? How do we arbitrate objectively on someone's subjective(-ish) internal experience?

This is, by the way, why science/academic environments often use weird tiptoe-y labels for stuff. Because they don't trust people to be honest (a lot of evidence shows people lie about or just straight-up don't understand their own internal states), but a lot of the ways we group people rely on internal states that researchers don't actually have direct access to. And so, the vaguely pomo language that's designed to either a) explicitly only describe someone's behaviour, or b) explicitly only describe someone's reported self-identity, to avoid the researcher having to make a call about whether the person is "lying" or not. This works okay in academia, because it's understood within this context of "hedging your bets" in order to accurately describe the group you're looking at; works poorly when it's exported into the regular world by psych undergrads with a twitter and delusions of intelligence, because it overcomplicates day-to-day shit to an unnecessary degree.

Respectfully disagree. If you're a dude and rather would fuck/be fucked by a dude than jack off, nigga you gay. Or at least bi.

 

[Friendly Futa]

Literally the only reason they want to be called lesbians is because that is exclusively a woman thing.

 

[RazorBackBacon]

Literally the only reason they want to be called lesbians is because that is exclusively a woman thing.

This. Arguing over the definitions of 'bisexual' and 'lesbian' is moot to the discussion of Kevin, because he's not adopting the label in good faith. He's adopting it to get access to puss-puss while also giving himself another community to hide in.

If Kevin thought claiming to be a straight Christian trad girl would get him pussy, he'd do it.

 

[Meiwaku]

Literally the only reason they want to be called lesbians is because that is exclusively a woman thing.

I fully believe this and anything that ONLY women have is something they wish to covet. If women had nothing to themselves not even a room of her own, sadly the time commeth again soon lassies where troons troonify it then they would have no copes

This. Arguing over the definitions of 'bisexual' and 'lesbian' is moot to the discussion of Kevin, because he's not adopting the label in good faith. He's adopting it to get access to puss-puss while also giving himself another community to hide in.

If Kevin thought claiming to be a straight Christian trad girl would get him pussy, he'd do it.

Doesn't he only fuck other scrote troons?

 

[RazorBackBacon]

Doesn't he only fuck other scrote troons?

Because they're the only one's who'll fuck him.

 

[Mr Snoid]

I don't know if you shopped it or not, but he looks like hes 80 in this photo.

He's mildly shooped to look more like an out-of-it doofus. Originally his appearance was meant to be "down-ish", but I scrapped that when he looked like a Chinese halfwit instead.

His skin is contrast-boosted to make crevices and blemishes stand out. While he ordinarily doesn't look 80, his face is already a wreck (as S.C.U.D. regularly demonstrates).

Spoiler: FACES OF KEV

 

[BSC]

Kevvie adding yet more plastic garbage to his collection. This "extremely lesbian" purple robot could also be yours for the low, low price of only $109.57! Save an additional 41% off shipping on all orders during Pride month. Much like the amhole, this offer won't stay open for long. Get yours today!

Spoiler

Link | Archive

 

[Just a Lotus Eater]

Kevvie adding yet more plastic garbage to his collection. This "extremely lesbian" purple robot could also be yours for the low, low price of only $109.57! Save an additional 41% off shipping on all orders during Pride month. Much like the amhole, this offer won't stay open for long. Get yours today!

View attachment 2242799
View attachment 2242800
View attachment 2242801

Spoiler

View attachment 2242844
View attachment 2242845

Link | Archive

Well, if he wants to be seen as a little girl, he's got the childish behavior down to a T

 

[eDove]

Kevvie adding yet more plastic garbage to his collection. This "extremely lesbian" purple robot could also be yours for the low, low price of only $109.57! Save an additional 41% off shipping on all orders during Pride month. Much like the amhole, this offer won't stay open for long. Get yours today!

View attachment 2242799
View attachment 2242800
View attachment 2242801

Spoiler

View attachment 2242844
View attachment 2242845

Link | Archive

Has no one ever asked him why, as a woman, he's exclusively into boy shit?

 

[m40gasmask]

Well, if he wants to be seen as a little girl, he's got the childish behavior down to a T

Coming up very short on the girl part, however. He literally acts like what he is: a fat nerd trying to larp as a 16 year old e-girl

 

[Marcus Tullius Cicero]

I fully believe this and anything that ONLY women have is something they wish to covet.

I wonder if trans-men are doing something similar with male spaces. However many of those are left.

 

[1440p Curved Monitor]

With two sexes (1,2) there are 4 possible configurations, ie straight(1), gay(2), bisexual(both 1 and 2), and then I guess you can throw in asexual (neither 1 nor 2), though I'm not fully convinced yet that that is a natural thing that happens vs. just being a result of trauma or even just being vanilla and not into the degenerate shit society is being groomed to accept.

It honestly makes sense if asexuality is natural. The existence of sexual attraction occurs naturally in humans via genetics, so it's very plausible that a human would get the genetic oopsie that made them lack such attraction. That being said, it's probably rare as fuck, because if you have too many with that mutation then the specie's population would decine (not happening in humans) and those with the mutation aren't obviously less likely to reproduce and can't pass on the mutation.

I personally think that most cases of bisexuality, especially in women, is a result of nuture because we just sexualize the female body so damn much that women start to subconsciously connect it to sexual arousal. I don't the the arousal manifests itself the same way that male arousal does though. I would say the same for lesbianism and gayness, but I'm not deep enough in those communities to make a judgment.

 

[BSC]

Has no one ever asked why, as a woman, he's exclusively into boy shit?

Because he's not a woman.

 

[Hell yeah dude]

Kevvie adding yet more plastic garbage to his collection. This "extremely lesbian" purple robot could also be yours for the low, low price of only $109.57! Save an additional 41% off shipping on all orders during Pride month. Much like the amhole, this offer won't stay open for long. Get yours today!
Link | Archive

A month ago

 

[Pizdec]

I'm going to be contrarian and say that there are some definitional problems in gay, straight, lesbian, and bi that have plagued these labels for decades.

Is being gay who you are or is being gay what you do? Or some combination of both? Or something else entirely?

For example, HIV/AIDS workers and researchers have struggled for a while with the fact that a lot of men (particularly Latinos and blacks) don't identify as gay and would be OUTRAGED if you suggested they were gay, but they still fuck other dudes. In some cultures, you're only gay if you're the bottom. Some straight boys fool around with other boys in school but it's more through horniness or experimentation than preference. Some man whores might identify as straight but fuck men for pay. Some men might be married to and have monogamous sex with a woman for decades but still be gay. There are tons of virginal, celibate gay priests. There are boys who are too young to experience sexual attraction but who are still unquestionably going to grow up to identify as gay.

Most (but not all!) of these point to gayness being an identity more than a behavior. However, a few years ago a chick who was claiming to be bi became president of a school gay club but then it emerged that she had only ever dated men, and I agree with the people who thought that she should resign because she didn't have the lived experience of a gay person.

None of this is put forth to validate any of Wedge's pomo tossed word salad, my sperg humour is flowing strong tonight and I needed to tap it.

In the end, gay is gay, bi is bi, lesbian is lesbian, and Wedge is trying pathetically to call the color red green while everyone tries to correct him.

 

[Old Fart]

"FACES OF KEV"

I see what you did there.

I wonder if trans-men are doing something similar with male spaces. However many of those are left.

Despair not, a visit to the local chapter of Hells Angels could re-encourage you.

 

[BSC]

Kevin woke up feeling absolutely euphoric and heckin' valid this morning.


Link | Archive

And who wouldn't be euphoric when surrounded by lovely ladies like these?

Spoiler: Tranny Faggot

Link | Archive

Furfag-to-troon pipeline confirmed.

Spoiler

Link | Archive

 

[eDove]

Kevin woke up feeling absolutely euphoric and heckin' valid this morning.
View attachment 2243531
View attachment 2243532
Link | Archive

And who wouldn't be euphoric when surrounded by lovely ladies like these?
View attachment 2243539

Spoiler: Tranny Faggot

View attachment 2243569

Link | Archive

Furfag-to-troon pipeline confirmed.
View attachment 2243553

Spoiler

View attachment 2243554

Link | Archive

The fact that they (AGPs in general) treat feminimity like such a novelty shows that it's all a fetishized performance. Normal women don't wake up and think "ahhh being a girl tho uwu" it's just fucking normal. These people are hyper-focused on shit normal people don't think about.

 

[A Grey Cat]

Kevvie adding yet more plastic garbage to his collection. This "extremely lesbian" purple robot could also be yours for the low, low price of only $109.57! Save an additional 41% off shipping on all orders during Pride month. Much like the amhole, this offer won't stay open for long. Get yours today!

View attachment 2242799
View attachment 2242800
View attachment 2242801

Spoiler

View attachment 2242844
View attachment 2242845

Link | Archiv

Posing his toys in an embrace and thinking ones a lesbo? Jesus Mary and Joseph that's something I'd expect from Chris.