UK Colin Pitchfork: Double schoolgirl murderer can be released - Released for good behavior and learning to help disabled people.

A double child killer who was the first murderer to be convicted using DNA evidence can be released, the Parole Board has confirmed.
Colin Pitchfork, 61, was jailed for life for raping and murdering 15-year-olds Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire in the 1980s.
Pitchfork has spent 33 years in prison - he was last denied parole in 2018.
The Parole Board said it was satisfied Pitchfork was suitable for release, which is subject to conditions.
"We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board has directed the release of Colin Pitchfork following an oral hearing," a Parole Board spokesman said.
"Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority."

The decision is provisional for 21 days, the spokesman added.

'Positive behaviour'​

In a document explaining its decision, the Parole Board said at the time of the offences, Pitchfork had been someone who thought "about sex a lot" and used "violence and excessive force" and "sex to demonstrate power and control over women".
He also struggled to cope with anger, loneliness and had a willingness to "seek revenge".
But in prison, the Parole Board said he had taken part in several courses to address his behaviour and the panel heard Pitchfork's "behaviour in custody had been positive and had included extensive efforts to help others", including learning skills to help disabled people.
The panel concluded: "After considering the circumstances of his offending, the progress made while in custody and the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel was satisfied that Mr Pitchfork was suitable for release."

Colin Pitchfork: Two brutal murders​

_85367911_52be843d-b38e-48b5-a220-165bd4daead1.jpg
  • Colin Pitchfork, 22 at the time of the first murder, was married with two sons. He was a baker who grew up in rural Leicestershire and lived in Littlethorpe
  • In November 1983 he left his baby son sleeping in the back of his car and raped and strangled 15-year-old Lynda Mann in Narborough. He then drove home and put his son to bed
  • Three years later, less than a mile from where Lynda died, he raped and murdered Dawn Ashworth, also 15, of Enderby. The pathologist who examined her body described it as a "brutal sexual assault"
  • A police investigation initially led to the wrong man, a local 17-year-old who falsely confessed to one of the killings. After an unprecedented mass screening of 5,000 men using pioneering "DNA profiling" technology, Pitchfork was eventually caught. At first, Pitchfork had evaded justice by persuading a colleague to take the test for him
  • He pleaded guilty to both murders in September 1987 and was sentenced to life in January 1988. The judge said the killings were "particularly sadistic" and he doubted Pitchfork would ever be released
  • In 2009, his 30-year life tariff was reduced by two years for "exceptional progress" - a decision that was strongly criticised by the families of his victims
  • He was moved to an undisclosed open prison at some point prior to 8 January 2017, after his request for release
Presentational grey line

A source close to Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said the government would take legal advice to explore the use of the "reconsideration mechanism".

The Parole Board Reconsideration Mechanism, introduced in 2019, gives people the right to ask for a decision to be looked at again if they believe it was "procedurally unfair" or "irrational".

'Immoral, wrong and dangerous'​

South Leicestershire MP Alberto Costa, who had met with the Parole Board over Pitchfork's case, told the BBC he was "appalled" at the news.
"Even though some 30 years have passed, this isn't the sort of crime one can ever forget," he said.
"My constituents remember the victims, people who went to school with these victims.
"It would be immoral, wrong and frankly dangerous to release this disgraceful murderer of two children."
Speaking to the BBC when Pitchfork was last denied parole, Lynda's mother Kath Eastwood said: "The Parole Board have made the right decision [and] put the families of the victims first and listened to us before the murderer.

"Let us hope this continues."

Pitchfork's parole hearing was held via video link on 22 March and included evidence from his probation office and a prison service psychologist.
The board then considered the evidence along with an examination of the "robustness" of the risk management plan before concluding its review on 25 May.
His release is subject to a number of licence conditions.
These include living at a designated address, taking part in probation supervision, wearing an electronic tag, taking part in lie detector tests and having to disclose what vehicles he uses and who he speaks to, with particular limits on contact with children.
He will also be subject to a curfew, have restrictions on using technology and limits on where he can go.

Article (archive)
 
Prison isn't just about incarceration, it's also about rehabilitation. That's the corner stone of the justice system. If you break a law, you serve your time in prison, when you've served your time, if you're fit to be released, under heavy supervision, then you are released.

Otherwise what's the point? You may as well just ship all of the people you're never going to release from prison, in to Africa or some shit-hole Island and let them figure the rest out on their own.
If you think a double child-murdering rapist who left his kid behind so he could go release the urge to kill can be 'rehabilitated' then maybe Mr. Pitchfork is an ideal choice for your caretaker.
 
If you think a double child-murdering rapist who left his kid behind so he could go release the urge to kill can be 'rehabilitated' then maybe Mr. Pitchfork is an ideal choice for your caretaker.
Why do you think he can't be rehabilitated? Isn't it possible that external factors + internal confusion could lead to him acting like he did?

A Troon cutting his cock off and this fella murdering people may have different legal and moral severities, but the psychological mechanism and impulses are the same. Should all Troons who want to return to normal, be told "fuck you, you're a woman now"?bear in mind that the severity is ramped up with this child killer.

I'm not excusing or forgiving what he did, he should be punished, and was and still is. Read the list of restrictions he rightly has placed on him. He's still in prison, it's just a more open prison.
 
Why do you think he can't be rehabilitated? Isn't it possible that external factors + internal confusion could lead to him acting like he did?
I can't speak for the poster you're directing this question at, but my answer would be that it doesn't matter whether he can or can't be rehabilitated or why he did what he did. Reading your posts in this thread tell me that you very much believe that rehabilitation is a worthy goal of the criminal justice process, no matter how heinous the crime. I think rehabilitation is merely one aspect of properly administered justice, with punishment and incapacitation being equally important aspects (and depending on the severity of the crime, much more important).

Read the list of restrictions he rightly has placed on him. He's still in prison, it's just a more open prison.
No. No he is not. He can walk around among others, enjoy nature, good food, and free air. The two girls he raped and murdered can't do anything like that. He should remain behind bars and be miserable until he expires.

You may as well just ship all of the people you're never going to release from prison, in to Africa or some shit-hole Island and let them figure the rest out on their own.
I think the fact that you put this forth as something that obviously SHOULDN'T be done firmly establishes that we have very divergent opinions about this matter and won't be convincing one another of our respective positions.
 
Last edited:
I can't speak for the poster you're directing this question at, but my answer would be that it doesn't matter whether he can or can't be rehabilitated or why he did what he did. Reading your posts in this thread tell me that you very much believe that rehabilitation is a worthy goal of the criminal justice process, no matter how heinous the crime. I think it's safe to say that our opinions are very divergent on that issue. I think rehabilitation is merely one aspect of properly administered justice, with punishment and incapacitation being equally important aspects (and depending on the severity of the crime, much more important).
I don't believe in the death penalty, neither am I lovey dovey 'let the criminals live'. I just don't see the point in a prison system if reform and rehabilitation isn't the top priority. IF people can't be rehabilitated, then I don't agree with locking them in a concrete building, draining resources. I would much prefer that they are sent in to the wild and forced to live as human pre-society, as they have thrown their right away to a free society. Preferably an island somewhere so that they can't escape, but one big enough so that its nature that they fight, not other humans. The Brits had the right idea with Australia, it was perfect. Its just a shame it was inhabited and that we treated the ABOs like shit.

No. No he is not. He can walk around among others, enjoy nature, good food, and free air. The two girls he raped and murdered can't do anything like that. He should remain behind bars and be miserable until he expires.
No, he can't. Electronically tagged, can only go to locations that he gets prior clearance for. Has to attend meetings, has restrictions on what he can buy, what websites he can look at and who he can contact. If he breaks any of those conditions, he's back in jail.
I think the fact that you put this forth as something that obviously SHOULDN'T be done firmly establishes that we have very divergent opinions about this matter and won't be convincing one another of our respective positions.
It's not about convincing, everyone has their own views, I'm just sharing mine and enjoy reading every one elses. Even if it's the yanky solution of "shoot em all and let God sort them out"
 
Why do you think he can't be rehabilitated?
"Rehabilitation" is a myth. The only people who get "rehabilitated" are stupid teenagers who got roped into committing minor crimes, and people who made some kind of a mistake that resulted in harm (e.g. distracted driver runs someone over). Neither of these people were going to reoffend, anyway; for a normal person (i.e. not a nigger). having to live with the fact you killed someone is itself punishment harsher than any prison. People like that shouldn't be in prison at all, they should be outside, working as hard as they can to pay off their debt to those they harmed. Psycho rapist murderer isn't going to be rehabilitated, either he knew rape and murder was bad and did it anyway, which makes him a rabid dog that must be put down, or hedidn't know that, which makes him a retard that's too dangerous to keep alive.

Isn't it possible that external factors + internal confusion could lead to him acting like he did?
What kind of an external factor could make someone rape and murder a 15 year old girl? And then do it again 3 years later? Demonic possession? The fuck?
 
"Rehabilitation" is a myth. The only people who get "rehabilitated" are stupid teenagers who got roped into committing minor crimes, and people who made some kind of a mistake that resulted in harm (e.g. distracted driver runs someone over). Neither of these people were going to reoffend, anyway; for a normal person (i.e. not a nigger). having to live with the fact you killed someone is itself punishment harsher than any prison. People like that shouldn't be in prison at all, they should be outside, working as hard as they can to pay off their debt to those they harmed. Psycho rapist murderer isn't going to be rehabilitated, either he knew rape and murder was bad and did it anyway, which makes him a rabid dog that must be put down, or hedidn't know that, which makes him a retard that's too dangerous to keep alive.

I disagree that it's a myth, but I believe our approach is often too soft. Over a century of psychological theories and practices show that rehabilitation is possible. even if it's a lobotomy.
What kind of an external factor could make someone rape and murder a 15 year old girl? And then do it again 3 years later? Demonic possession? The fuck?
Crappy life, raped as a kid, beaten as a kid, no parents etc etc. The usual list of bad stuff that happens to every serial killer. Psychological profiles work for a reason (not to go OT but profiles work for catching criminals, but it's racist when it comes to anything else)
 
It's easier to be forgiven for a rape and/or murder these days than calling someone a nigger, which is an unforgivable mortal sin. I'm not sure how this is squared without cognitive dissonance TBH.

BTW I recall reading that in the United States, the rate at which those sentenced to up to life in prison but who satisfy a parole board for release have a (murder) recidivism rate below the population average. I guess this a function of both their old age (criminals burn out by 40, usually) and the caution of parole boards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pomme Poire Peche
I disagree that it's a myth, but I believe our approach is often too soft. Over a century of psychological theories and practices show that rehabilitation is possible. even if it's a lobotomy.

Crappy life, raped as a kid, beaten as a kid, no parents etc etc. The usual list of bad stuff that happens to every serial killer. Psychological profiles work for a reason (not to go OT but profiles work for catching criminals, but it's racist when it comes to anything else)

Aww, he should definitely be able to get out and rape and murder more children, as long as it helps him cope with his theoretical childhood bullshit which is in no way ”bad stuff that happens to every serial killer.”

Why exactly do you think that the possibilty of being caught will prevent him from doing the things he did that got him sent up in the first place? Was he unaware that being a serial rapist and murderer of children was illegal, maybe? Well good news now he’s aware and I’m sure that was all that was needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
Aww, he should definitely be able to get out and rape and murder more children, as long as it helps him cope with his theoretical childhood bullshit which is in no way ”bad stuff that happens to every serial killer.”

Is it necessary to counter my point by going to the absolute extremes? You're painting it as if i want these people to murder and kill or be forgiven. I do not. I would punish these people more severely than what a prison could do but i also believe in redemption, rehabilitation and reform. If you don't, then the only other options are to lock a human in a building for the rest of the their lives, or instantly execute anyone who commits a serious crime. I don't agree with either option.

Go have a look at serial killers. They very rarely have a pleasant, happy childhood. It's either sexual abuse, beatings or some other form of abuse. It's why profiling works so well, because they all follow the same patterns. There's another quirk about serial killers IIRC is that they all take trophies from victims, without exception and that includes every serial killer ever caught.
Why exactly do you think that the possibilty of being caught will prevent him from doing the things he did that got him sent up in the first place? Was he unaware that being a serial rapist and murderer of children was illegal, maybe? Well good news now he’s aware and I’m sure that was all that was needed.
Why do you think after 30+ years in jail, he would do anything to risk going back inside?

Again, you've responded emotionally to the complete opposite end of the spectrum. You're asking if he knew it was 'wrong', he almost certainly did, but that doesn't explain why he did it.

Big picture mode: I couldn't give a monkey's fart if this guy lives a peaceful life for the next 30 years, or he's trampled to death by horses tomorrow. What i do care about is why these people do what they do. Once we know that, we can stop it, because prison and execution sure ain't doing shit.
 
I disagree that it's a myth, but I believe our approach is often too soft. Over a century of psychological theories and practices show that rehabilitation is possible. even if it's a lobotomy.

Crappy life, raped as a kid, beaten as a kid, no parents etc etc. The usual list of bad stuff that happens to every serial killer. Psychological profiles work for a reason (not to go OT but profiles work for catching criminals, but it's racist when it comes to anything else)
Ok fair, if you consider lobotomy to be rehabilitation then I agree. That's about the only way to rehabilitate someone who willingly murdered another person.

That said, psychological profiles work about as well as a coin toss. Psychology is palm reading for people who think they're too smart for that.
 
I respectfully disagree.
With the advances being made in 3D imaging of the brain and the neural pathways being observed in real time, the body of psychology will be vastly improved in the upcoming decades.
It is very interesting the developments that are happening and how they will lead to clearer understanding of the misfunction of the brain.
 
With the advances being made in 3D imaging of the brain and the neural pathways being observed in real time, the body of psychology will be vastly improved in the upcoming decades.
It is very interesting the developments that are happening and how they will lead to clearer understanding of the misfunction of the brain.
I agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Death Grip
A double child killer who was the first murderer to be convicted using DNA evidence can be released, the Parole Board has confirmed.
Colin Pitchfork, 61, was jailed for life for raping and murdering 15-year-olds Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire in the 1980s.
Pitchfork has spent 33 years in prison - he was last denied parole in 2018.
The Parole Board said it was satisfied Pitchfork was suitable for release, which is subject to conditions.
"We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board has directed the release of Colin Pitchfork following an oral hearing," a Parole Board spokesman said.
"Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority."

The decision is provisional for 21 days, the spokesman added.

'Positive behaviour'​

In a document explaining its decision, the Parole Board said at the time of the offences, Pitchfork had been someone who thought "about sex a lot" and used "violence and excessive force" and "sex to demonstrate power and control over women".
He also struggled to cope with anger, loneliness and had a willingness to "seek revenge".
But in prison, the Parole Board said he had taken part in several courses to address his behaviour and the panel heard Pitchfork's "behaviour in custody had been positive and had included extensive efforts to help others", including learning skills to help disabled people.
The panel concluded: "After considering the circumstances of his offending, the progress made while in custody and the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel was satisfied that Mr Pitchfork was suitable for release."

Colin Pitchfork: Two brutal murders​

View attachment 2239894
  • Colin Pitchfork, 22 at the time of the first murder, was married with two sons. He was a baker who grew up in rural Leicestershire and lived in Littlethorpe
  • In November 1983 he left his baby son sleeping in the back of his car and raped and strangled 15-year-old Lynda Mann in Narborough. He then drove home and put his son to bed
  • Three years later, less than a mile from where Lynda died, he raped and murdered Dawn Ashworth, also 15, of Enderby. The pathologist who examined her body described it as a "brutal sexual assault"
  • A police investigation initially led to the wrong man, a local 17-year-old who falsely confessed to one of the killings. After an unprecedented mass screening of 5,000 men using pioneering "DNA profiling" technology, Pitchfork was eventually caught. At first, Pitchfork had evaded justice by persuading a colleague to take the test for him
  • He pleaded guilty to both murders in September 1987 and was sentenced to life in January 1988. The judge said the killings were "particularly sadistic" and he doubted Pitchfork would ever be released
  • In 2009, his 30-year life tariff was reduced by two years for "exceptional progress" - a decision that was strongly criticised by the families of his victims
  • He was moved to an undisclosed open prison at some point prior to 8 January 2017, after his request for release
Presentational grey line

A source close to Justice Secretary Robert Buckland said the government would take legal advice to explore the use of the "reconsideration mechanism".

The Parole Board Reconsideration Mechanism, introduced in 2019, gives people the right to ask for a decision to be looked at again if they believe it was "procedurally unfair" or "irrational".

'Immoral, wrong and dangerous'​

South Leicestershire MP Alberto Costa, who had met with the Parole Board over Pitchfork's case, told the BBC he was "appalled" at the news.
"Even though some 30 years have passed, this isn't the sort of crime one can ever forget," he said.
"My constituents remember the victims, people who went to school with these victims.
"It would be immoral, wrong and frankly dangerous to release this disgraceful murderer of two children."
Speaking to the BBC when Pitchfork was last denied parole, Lynda's mother Kath Eastwood said: "The Parole Board have made the right decision [and] put the families of the victims first and listened to us before the murderer.

"Let us hope this continues."

Pitchfork's parole hearing was held via video link on 22 March and included evidence from his probation office and a prison service psychologist.
The board then considered the evidence along with an examination of the "robustness" of the risk management plan before concluding its review on 25 May.
His release is subject to a number of licence conditions.
These include living at a designated address, taking part in probation supervision, wearing an electronic tag, taking part in lie detector tests and having to disclose what vehicles he uses and who he speaks to, with particular limits on contact with children.
He will also be subject to a curfew, have restrictions on using technology and limits on where he can go.

Article (archive)

Colin Pitchfork: Double child killer's release confirmed https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-57737050
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: madethistocomment
Back