Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wu lies out his fucking ass.txt

https://archive.is/c30lR


There is a lot of bullshit in that, I don't have the stomach to go through in detail, but one question:

"Someone just emailed me their fantasy about mutilating my genitals, and murdering me by slicing my body in half."

WHAT THE FUCK IS WU TALKING ABOUT?

Link us to it, show us the supposed horror, you fucking coward! Why can't you tell us the fucking truth and let us know what kind of sick fuck would write this shit?

Oh wait, let me guess, another fucking lie, right?

I'm going to go digging around and see if I can't find ANYTHING that might back up Wu's bullshit on this, but I'll let @Jaimas or someone with more stomach than I have at the moment wade through this crock of shit.

It's fake, like most of Wu's alleged harassment. If she won't post specifics, it doesn't exist.
 
Ah wait, I found it, at least this was the most likely result when I typed in "Brianna Wu sliced in half mutilated genitals":

http://somethingsensitive.com/index.php?topic=801.6775

Look for the first post by GAPO, it's basically a James Bond parody where SJWs fuck up everything that made Bond movies cool and Bond gets his revenge by turning a mission where he has to protect Brianna Wu into one where he quits out of frustration and leaves Wu to be vivisected by a laser.

I even know why Wu didn't mention it:

Bond had indeed read the dossier on Brianna wu. And as he did so, the confusion and unease he felt had given way to steely British resolve. He understood that his mission could still serve a purpose. That he could help mankind, even in the course of a misguided and seemingly pointless mission.

He looked at the lanky transsexual on the concrete slab, the laser etching a charred black trail toward his mutilated genitalia.

"Do you expect me to stop Tweeting?" Wu asked.

"No, Mr. Flynt, I expect you to die." Bond said coldly. He then turned and left the room, bolting the door fast from the outside. Then, walking away from the steel building towards his DBS (which he had only driven the electric car far enough to retrieve), he dialed a cell phone.

"Blofeld? It's Bond. ......... James Bond..........Let's just say I've had a change of heart. If you're willing to listen, I've got some ideas that cold make us both very rich."

He gunned the engine of the Aston Martin and sped across the salt flats, lighting a cigarette



Basically, Wu had his uncomfortable past brought up and didn't want to actually have to cite the supposed threat because it mentioned he used to be named John Flynt.

It's not even a fucking threat, it's just retarded shitposting by a bunch of assholes writing mean spirited parody.
 
Last edited:
Ah wait, I found it, at least this was the most likely result when I typed in "Brianna Wu sliced in half mutilated genitals":

http://somethingsensitive.com/index.php?topic=801.6775

Look for the first post by GAPO, it's basically a James Bond parody where SJWs fuck up everything that made Bond movies cool and Bond gets his revenge by turning a mission where he has to protect Brianna Wu into one where he quits out of frustration and leaves Wu to be vivisected by a laser.

I even know why Wu didn't mention it:

Bond had indeed read the dossier on Brianna wu. And as he did so, the confusion and unease he felt had given way to steely British resolve. He understood that his mission could still serve a purpose. That he could help mankind, even in the course of a misguided and seemingly pointless mission.

He looked at the lanky transsexual on the concrete slab, the laser etching a charred black trail toward his mutilated genitalia.

"Do you expect me to stop Tweeting?" Wu asked.

"No, Mr. Flynt, I expect you to die." Bond said coldly. He then turned and left the room, bolting the door fast from the outside. Then, walking away from the steel building towards his DBS (which he had only driven the electric car far enough to retrieve), he dialed a cell phone.

"Blofeld? It's Bond. ......... James Bond..........Let's just say I've had a change of heart. If you're willing to listen, I've got some ideas that cold make us both very rich."

He gunned the engine of the Aston Martin and sped across the salt flats, lighting a cigarette



Basically, Wu had his uncomfortable past brought up and didn't want to actually have to cite the supposed threat because it mentioned he used to be named John Flynt.

It's not even a fucking threat, it's just retarded shitposting by a bunch of assholes writing mean spirited parody.

Going right in the fucking Wiki.

BONUS: Meanwhile, on NeoGAF, a user is banned for suggesting Wu benefited in some way from Gamergate.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I would put the Huffington Post on that level, they actually interviewed the Harassment Patrol and had a panel with Erik Kain on it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spellskite
Not much of a guess.

The Gaurdian or Huff Puff are the only two "news" sites that would post such drivel. And both have about the same standing in the eyes of the Everyman, as in squat.
But what I don't get is that they're all exactly the same. Once you've read one of these articles, you've read them all.
 
But what I don't get is that they're all exactly the same. Once you've read one of these articles, you've read them all.

It's called "The Narrative" and yah it get boring pretty quick but a lot of people are so deeply invested in "The Narrative" or benefit financially from pushing "The Narrative" that hoping it will change by itself is rather silly.
 
OK, who's up for writing a level-headed, impeccably referenced rebuttal to Brianna? I've known a couple of colleagues who got comment pieces published in The Guardian as rebuttals/right to reply pieces. They don't pay you anything, but they are in the business of getting eyeballs on pages, so as long as the piece was well-written and had a serious tone I think they'd probably go for it.

We've got some Kiwis here who write at a professional level. @Jaimas and @He Sets Me On Fire, for a start, off the top of my head at this late hour.

Maybe if a comment piece is too ambitious, how about an open letter to the editor?
 
I'm sure you're proud of it, Wu, too bad it's all bullshit:


This article isn't even the usual bunch of lies. It's just nothing. There's maybe one actual citation and the rest of it is just sanctimonious blabbering. Though I reckon writing can be quite challenging if you have to make a point on more than 140 characters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back