Secret Gamer Girl / SecretGamerGrrl / Googleshng / "Violet Hargrave" / Jacob Lawrence (Jake) Alley / Violet Cassandra Ocean - Delusional Zoe Quinn Stalker, Libelous Tweeter, Thirsty Gnome, Faux-Tranny Neckbeard Incel, Micropenis, "Known Troubled Person", Creator of "Massive vs the Masses", Self-Described "Noise Making Thing"; Lives in Niantic, CT

Why would any parents care in the least about the babbling and burbling of a fat, middle aged male incel? He has absolutely nothing to offer them other than himself, literally as a warning of what not to raise. Don't do whatever Jake's parents did to end up with such worthless offspring.
Jake still claims to be in fear for his life and that his career prospects have been shattered.
His shitter has been shattered but only by himself and his own stupidity.
 
Last edited:
I've always hated the phrases "do research" or "educate yourself" especially from "investigative journalists" like Jake and Toren. I've always assumed its really meant "I have been brainwashed by propaganda. I lack the charisma and interpersonal skills to manipulate you but I won't have my cult mentality shaken either."
The ironic thing is, as soon as I see someone using those phrases, I make sure not to bother. Maybe there’s evidence in favour of their position, maybe not. But I can say for certain that my opponent doesn’t know either.
 
The ironic thing is, as soon as I see someone using those phrases, I make sure not to bother. Maybe there’s evidence in favour of their position, maybe not. But I can say for certain that my opponent doesn’t know either.
If they had evidence, they’d take the literal seconds it takes to Google it and pull up an article.
It’s always best to just respond with “so you have no evidence? Sorry, the spread of misinformation is how we got Trump and I won’t participate in such campaigns.”
 
"Gamergate is an amazing way for people to waste their lives" you say...
And to illustrate how pathetic the GG nazi stalkers are he points out that people he knows have been starting families, companies and getting into politics since GG.

He's correct when he points out that the (imaginary) nazi campaign against his life has accomplished nothing, every shocking blow against him have come from his friends and allies.
 
1623273361140.png1623273373181.png1623273397224.png

I checked, every response he got was on his side of wanting YouTube controlled/shutdown by the government, with a couple people asking for sources. Amount of nazi spam was literally that one account he quoted. Obviously, he's talking about his broken DMs....

Trans shit, "those pills that give you a cute face and big boobs":
1623273617723.png1623273629435.png
 
That "reply guy" chart was amazing but the lede got buried.

Jake may never have experienced a "mass abandonment," but not one of his reply guys continues to reply at him for even 90 days. A single calendar quarter of relationship building is forever out of Jake's reach. The only people who talk to him over a period of years are the ones who are doling out their responses a few per year.

Jake's wrong about a lot. He's wrong about why it happens. But he is right that he cannot maintain any friendship. None. Not with flattery addicts. Not with special interest spergs. Not with furry coomers whose sole purpose in life is tweeting at other poor unfortunate souls.

This site is full of cows. But I'm not sure any cow here desperately wants a herd and remains so alone. Jake's longest friendships last about the same time as an HBO season.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2247611View attachment 2247612View attachment 2247614

I checked, every response he got was on his side of wanting YouTube controlled/shutdown by the government, with a couple people asking for sources. Amount of nazi spam was literally that one account he quoted. Obviously, he's talking about his broken DMs....

Trans shit, "those pills that give you a cute face and big boobs":
View attachment 2247631View attachment 2247633
June 9 is Jake's actual birthday. That is how he chose to spend it.
 
This site is full of cows. But I'm not sure any cow here desperately wants a herd and remains so alone.
He imagine himself as a thought leader, it's just that people aren't listening to him. For reasons he never really thinks about. Those that do reply and interact with him are scrubs and not worthy of his time so he ignores them. In many ways he's the opposite of Cassandra and his middle name should have been "Hubris".
 
Last edited:
The ironic thing is, as soon as I see someone using those phrases, I make sure not to bother.
Any time I hear that shit, my interpretation is "the dumb shit I just said is wrong" or at the very least "I have absolutely no evidence for what I just said." I try to avoid doing this and whenever I say some shit and someone says "you got a source for that," I either provide one or admit I have no source. I don't necessarily abandon the position but I really do have to resort to an "aw shucks" position on my lack of a source.

A pathetic asshole like Jake is incapable of doing this, which is why even his TalkingTime hidey hole created a special Jake rule just for him, "opinions as facts."
 
Jake may never have experienced a "mass abandonment," but not one of his reply guys continues to reply at him for even 90 days.
I'm not sure I follow you, the "Duration" column was in months. He's definitely had reply guys like KayinNasaki who've been along fairly regularly for years.

Anyhow, I have another mini-feature for the entertainment of all:

True Love Part Deux

Remember how CHELSAY has never once told Jake "I love you"? It got me to wondering, who has she said it to?
As it happens, she's said it to 105 people, 22 of which more than once.

The rules: I only included times she said "I love you" directly to a person or people. Saying "I love him" to someone else doesn't count, neither does "I love your work" or even "I love everything about you and everything you've ever done". It has to be the magic words, delivered personally.

LoverLove Given
@christinelove10
@patriciaxh6
@hanfreakinsolo5
@jennatar4
@petitemistress4
@ptibz4
@theblacknerd4
@tonitonirocca4
@twoscooters4
@konjak3
@mechapoetic3
@alexlifschitz2
@almostapollo2
@c4182
@ianwexl0rz2
@kiimpulsively2
@legobutts2
@nikaharper2
@slimekat2
@tha_rami2
@winnersusedrugs2
@zandravandra2
@_andrio1
@10rdben1
@aliceandstuff1
@amadonc1
@andrewtraviss1
@annasproul1
@arthur_affect1
@ashpanic1
@athenahollow1
@avian_flame1
@beamsplashx1
@beetlenaut1
@billzoeker1
@birblycordy1
@blackamazon1
@bluesweatshirt1
@capn_andy1
@capnraccoon1
@celsiusgs1
@chead1
@ckunzelman1
@cyberpill1
@daphaknee1
@dasharez0ne1
@dirtbagboyfren1
@ebeinke1
@emdroid1
@emtropy1
@failboatskipper1
@feitclub1
@gaydarade1
@greatdetective01
@havochq1
@hellocakebread1
@henryfaber1
@hilariouscow1
@honestwilliam1
@hownottodraw1
@hunktears1
@in_a_pinch1
@indiestatik1
@iron_spike1
@jfriedhoff1
@julianspillane1
@jurburr1
@lanathegun1
@laura_hudson1
@leighalexander1
@lemistith1
@looost_levels1
@lucyromana1
@msminotaur1
@nameoftheyear1
@narutochode881
@netgrind1
@notquitefrodo1
@owlsparliament1
@peramene1
@personfaces1
@phil_fish1
@pillowfort1
@psychicteeth1
@q0rtz1
@randyorenstein1
@redhalfguard1
@regretagarbo1
@ronsenburger1
@sailorbee1
@samusclone1
@sarahjeong1
@seth13891
@sfthewolf1
@somethingpc1
@sosowski1
@sweden1
@thekarlapacheco1
@trinandtonic1
@videodreaming1
@wademcgillis1
@wesleysnipes1
@xmattiebrice1
@xychelsea1
@younghorses1

The Dulcinea to Violet's Quixote was not at all reticent when it came to declaring her love, generally speaking. She's even said "I love you" to Arthur Chu, Nora Reed, Sarah Butts, Phil Fish, Chelsea Manning, Wesley Snipes, Poor Hungry Hazel, and the country of Sweden... but not Jake. It seems that she always knew that would be lighting the fuse on a seriously dangerous stalker.
 
I'm not sure I follow you, the "Duration" column was in months. He's definitely had reply guys like KayinNasaki who've been along fairly regularly for years.

Anyhow, I have another mini-feature for the entertainment of all:

True Love Part Deux

Remember how CHELSAY has never once told Jake "I love you"? It got me to wondering, who has she said it to?
As it happens, she's said it to 105 people, 22 of which more than once.

The rules: I only included times she said "I love you" directly to a person or people. Saying "I love him" to someone else doesn't count, neither does "I love your work" or even "I love everything about you and everything you've ever done". It has to be the magic words, delivered personally.

LoverLove Given
@christinelove10
@patriciaxh6
@hanfreakinsolo5
@jennatar4
@petitemistress4
@ptibz4
@theblacknerd4
@tonitonirocca4
@twoscooters4
@konjak3
@mechapoetic3
@alexlifschitz2
@almostapollo2
@c4182
@ianwexl0rz2
@kiimpulsively2
@legobutts2
@nikaharper2
@slimekat2
@tha_rami2
@winnersusedrugs2
@zandravandra2
@_andrio1
@10rdben1
@aliceandstuff1
@amadonc1
@andrewtraviss1
@annasproul1
@arthur_affect1
@ashpanic1
@athenahollow1
@avian_flame1
@beamsplashx1
@beetlenaut1
@billzoeker1
@birblycordy1
@blackamazon1
@bluesweatshirt1
@capn_andy1
@capnraccoon1
@celsiusgs1
@chead1
@ckunzelman1
@cyberpill1
@daphaknee1
@dasharez0ne1
@dirtbagboyfren1
@ebeinke1
@emdroid1
@emtropy1
@failboatskipper1
@feitclub1
@gaydarade1
@greatdetective01
@havochq1
@hellocakebread1
@henryfaber1
@hilariouscow1
@honestwilliam1
@hownottodraw1
@hunktears1
@in_a_pinch1
@indiestatik1
@iron_spike1
@jfriedhoff1
@julianspillane1
@jurburr1
@lanathegun1
@laura_hudson1
@leighalexander1
@lemistith1
@looost_levels1
@lucyromana1
@msminotaur1
@nameoftheyear1
@narutochode881
@netgrind1
@notquitefrodo1
@owlsparliament1
@peramene1
@personfaces1
@phil_fish1
@pillowfort1
@psychicteeth1
@q0rtz1
@randyorenstein1
@redhalfguard1
@regretagarbo1
@ronsenburger1
@sailorbee1
@samusclone1
@sarahjeong1
@seth13891
@sfthewolf1
@somethingpc1
@sosowski1
@sweden1
@thekarlapacheco1
@trinandtonic1
@videodreaming1
@wademcgillis1
@wesleysnipes1
@xmattiebrice1
@xychelsea1
@younghorses1

The Dulcinea to Violet's Quixote was not at all reticent when it came to declaring her love, generally speaking. She's even said "I love you" to Arthur Chu, Nora Reed, Sarah Butts, Phil Fish, Chelsea Manning, Wesley Snipes, Poor Hungry Hazel, and the country of Sweden... but not Jake. It seems that she always knew that would be lighting the fuse on a seriously dangerous stalker.
...and that fuse is one of those trick re-lighting birthday candles that refuse to be blown out, even as you exhale yourself into a hernia.
 
I'm not sure I follow you, the "Duration" column was in months. He's definitely had reply guys like KayinNasaki who've been along fairly regularly for years.

Oh damn then I'm just an illiterate and Jake really IS wrong about everything he complains about. The more fool me for thinking he could ever be right about something.
 
Jake dropped a big ol turd to try and take advantage of his temporarily "fame":
1623372019681.png1623372045368.png1623372057413.png1623372074093.png1623372093745.png1623372111460.png

Violet Cassandra Ocean said:
Here's a subject I haven't really gotten directly sermonizing about for a bit, in large part because of the chilling effect of what I'm going to lay out in the rest of this thread.

For a good long while, one of the most popular public faces of the modern fascist movement was a creep whose name I'd prefer not to directly invoke, both because I know it's still a trauma trigger, and because he changed his name to a long one from a culture he does not actually have roots in with the intent of encouraging people to normalize racist parodies of it. Wrote for Breitbart, bunch of scandals, you probably remember him.

And you may also remember, or maybe not, that the moment the tide turned on him and his ability to get anyone to pay him any attention started to plummet when, in doing a background check because he was slated to speak at a more mainstream right-wing event, that he'd been filmed in a TV interview some years prior speaking candidly about his views on the subject, which I should very much slap a CW on this whole thread for, of pedophila.

Specifically, he was in favor of it. Which also caused people to pay a bit more attention to all the teenage ghost writers he was offloading his assignments to and his close ties to a website whose whole primary purpose was distributing related images and tips for grooming and full on abduction, and the long and short of it is that while society at large apparently didn't have a serious problem with all the other unspeakably evil things he was (and to the degree he has any remaining power, still is) involved in, pedophilia was The Line it turns out. Step over that and you're done.

This was pretty shocking to his fellows (who, again, generally all hang out on the other side of that line themselves) and over the past several years, they have been making a really concentrated damage control effort, not to make sure that none of the rest of them would be outed as pedophiles, but to make sure when it happened in the future, people would just roll their eyes about it.

And this has been playing out across a lot of different fronts. The first and most obvious of course was a test drive of whether it was a powerful enough accusation that it could also destroy people with blind shots at the biggest available targets, with the whole "Pizzagate" thing. I hope we all remember that one still? washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/… Right wing conspiracy types claiming a random pizza place in D.C. had a basement and in that basement they were sexually torturing and/or ritually sacrificing children and also by "they" I mean roughly every member of the Democratic party who were also Satan-worshipping lizard people, and this remains the basis for its direct continuation as the whole Qanon thing, largely fueled by this guy?

They got more mileage out of that than should really have been possible (again, this is still the central pillar of the whole Qanon thing, which is popular enough to have backers serving in the freaking House of Representatives) these days, but didn't really draw anyone in who wasn't already drinking the far right conspiracy Kool-Aid as it were.

And alongside this, we of course have the British Women's Fascism Brigade and their various supporters running full tilt with the old "queer people are all child predators" thing which is a battlecry it's not like anyone's ever fully retired, but it's been really given a megaphone lately and focused more directly at trans people (mainly women) specifically as basically everyone alive today personally knows too many gay people to really buy into it with them anymore.

Also I point this out what feels to me like damn near every time I approach the topic these days, but as he still has a career and says this crap in broad daylight, I must once again observe that in trying to pretend they have any facts on their side, that crowd keeps trying to present this guy as an expert everyone should trust if we want to keep children safe from predators: archive.is/4F5Gq

Archive link, again, not because that isn't still up on his feed, but because even if I've already thrown a content warning on this thread I don't want to darken your feeds
with a big bold direct quotation.

At the moment though, it generally feels like the phase of going "I know you are but what am I?" has generally run its course, and the newest part of the strategy is to make obviously baseless accusations of pedophilia such a common sight that people are trained into dismissing them offhand, even when they see ones that are actually serious, credible, or even fully documented and prosecuted.

Kind of a Spartacus approach to the matter, if you will.

This, incidentally, was the main thing that inspired that post I made

the other day that absolutely blew up-

The biggest fascist "op" running these days is to indoctrinate teens (and/or impersonate said teens) with this idea that any time anyone writes something, draws something, or films something, it is imperative to scan it for "secret pro-pedophile messages" like (and these are all real examples) romantic couples whose ages are 2 or more years apart regardless of what age they are, couples where one person is taller than the other, couples where one person has a better job, adults commenting on media aimed at children in any way, where "media aimed at children" includes, like, Star Wars movies. Writing or reading fan fiction, just in general, producing children's cartoons, marking adult content as such ("why would you say your art is 18+ if you didn't want to lure in children who don't respect boundaries!?") or of course "defending or associating with" people in any way involved with any of the above.

So yes, in practice, this covers... basically everyone who has ever lived. And accordingly, I'm willing to assume that everyone reading this (or at least all the queer people since, again, fascists are trying to focus things on queer people in particular, years of witch hunts lending extra credibility there, etc.) has seen at least a few absolutely bonkers witch hunts along these lines aimed at people who clearly have never done or said anything remotely related to those accusations.

And again, that's the point. When it's normalized that basically everyone in the world has a bunch of witch hunting weirdos calling them pedophiles, and everyone understands that those accusations are utter BS, the next time someone points out that some politician is facing criminal charges for sexually assaulting a child, or freaking James Cantor is petitioning to have LGBT+ antidiscrimination laws extended to pedophiles, or Mike Cernovich is on the talk show circuit trying to get us to forget he wrote a guide on how to rape women and not be arrested and was giving legal advice to the founder and then-owner of one of the better known hubs for child pornography on how to keep it from getting shut down, people will also dismiss THAT as "a baseless witch hunt," and tada, the one atrocity that can end the career of a total monster when it comes to light is fully disabled.

So, let's all please start playing hardball with the little creeps crying wolf constantly.
There's a word on the tip of my tongue for the content of this Googleshng, but I can't quite grasp it. Not schizophrenic, but similar.
 
Jake dropped a big ol turd to try and take advantage of his temporarily "fame":
He calls it "sermonizing". I genuinely think he believes he's like a preacher in the church of SJW, testifying to the believers about what they should and should not do. I always like it when people like Jake inadvertently underline how they are the new Fundamentalist Church.

He also makes lots of wild claims about Milo's pedophilia in a way that suggests Jake thinks the "unspeakably evil" crime of saying words Jake doesn't like is worse than any actual crimes against children he might have committed.

Incidentally, belatedly throwing in a trigger warning a few words before the alleged trigger isn't how things work in SJW land, Jake. The only reason you won't get pulled up on this is because no one who gives a shit will get far enough in your googleshng to reach that point.
 
Jake dropped a big ol turd to try and take advantage of his temporarily "fame":
View attachment 2251300View attachment 2251303View attachment 2251305View attachment 2251311View attachment 2251312View attachment 2251314


There's a word on the tip of my tongue for the content of this Googleshng, but I can't quite grasp it. Not schizophrenic, but similar.
So have I got this right? Jake’s rant of the day is, “We mustn’t tolerate it when people make baseless allegations of paedophilia against our side, because no one will believe our baseless allegations of paedophilia against their side.”
 
LOL. The Attic Gnome is Googlshnging about Milo Yabbadabadoo. How fresh and topical!
It took you one sentence to express the crucial bit of information that I couldn't get from skimming an entire googlshng of vapid bloviating.

I am never sure if I should attribute Jake's awful communication to the fact that he's useless at the thing he claims to be (a 'professional' writer) or because he and a large portion of the nutty woke-wing still super believe in Harry Potter and not saying Voldemort (even if the author is totally a she who shall not be named, now)
 
I am never sure if I should attribute Jake's awful communication to the fact that he's useless at the thing he claims to be (a 'professional' writer) or because he and a large portion of the nutty woke-wing still super believe in Harry Potter and not saying Voldemort (even if the author is totally a she who shall not be named, now)
There’s also his tremendous cowardice. If he doesn’t mention the names, he thinks he has plausible deniability. Even if it’s really obvious who he’s talking about. Kind of like how he thinks it doesn’t count as lying if he only strongly implies something. He just doesn’t get how intelligent other people are relative to him.
 
Back