Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

I don't know about over there, but here a business has the right to refuse service to a customer that makes the workers feel uncomfortable. Has he never seen a business refuse service before?

That's the point, though. He believes he's entitled to service regardless of his behavior (if they'd just let him explain, they'd understand he wasn't a creep and they were actually in the wrong for being uncomfortable) and if they persist in refusing him, they're discriminating against him because he's disabled. He believes that since disabled people are legally entitled to the same treatment and access as non-disabled people, it means he gets whatever he wants, whenever he wants it. If a woman won't fuck an ugly man because he's ugly, that's fine -- but if he's ugly because he's disabled, she's legally compelled to fuck him. In Russ's head, the only reason anyone would deny him anything is because of anti-disabled bigotry, not because he doesn't deserve it, isn't entitled to it, or the person providing it simply doesn't feel like giving it to him.

For example, he used to frequent this tanning salon. He wanted the receptionist's phone number and she wouldn't give it to him. So he gave her his social media information and she didn't end up following him on Instagram. So he wrote a nasty review of the salon and how their staff was rude (and needed training in disability rights or sensitivity or something, iirc... I might be mixing up anecdotes here, as there are just so fucking many of them). He doesn't get that women have the right to say no to his explicit advances while they're at work, let alone that they might have the right to refuse him service because he's a fucking creep. And if they do, it's because they're bigots.

Legalized prostitution might be fantastic for the world overall, but for Russ it means that hookers would be legitimate businesses, and he can then bring the weight of the ADA down on them if they refuse him service. He did exactly that with Hof's brothels when he got banned for falsely claiming one of their girls had AIDS. His reasoning was that he has "anxiety" and that's why he made the claim, so to ban him for making that claim was discrimination based on his medical condition.

He's a lunatic, and also pretty stupid. What little brains he has are devoted to motivated reasoning and Dunning-Kruger. Any possible reality where Russ isn't totally correct, the very best at whatever he's trying to do, and wholly entitled to have him his penis sucked is to be avoided at all costs by his little rat-brain.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Legalized prostitution might be fantastic for the world overall, but for Russ it means that hookers would be legitimate businesses, and he can then bring the weight of the ADA down on them if they refuse him service. He did exactly that with Hof's brothels when he got banned for falsely claiming one of their girls had AIDS. His reasoning was that he has "anxiety" and that's why he made the claim, so to ban him for making that claim was discrimination based on his medical condition.

Not only did he think he couldn't be banned for defaming her, he thought no one could be mad at him for what he said because he was anxious. He's said things to that effect since then.

 

[Sam Losco]

They were video auditions. He just threw together that video we saw the short clip from and emailed it to them. I imagine he either got a form letter or just no response at all.

All we can hope is that he uploads it to youtube as "evidence of discrimination" like he did with his PowerPoint audition.

Speaking of which, I looked for it yesterday and he took it off youtube. Sure hope someone has it archived somewhere.

I wonder if the video he submitted was the same potato quality as the clip he posted.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Legalized prostitution might be fantastic for the world overall, but for Russ it means that hookers would be legitimate businesses, and he can then bring the weight of the ADA down on them if they refuse him service. He did exactly that with Hof's brothels when he got banned for falsely claiming one of their girls had AIDS. His reasoning was that he has "anxiety" and that's why he made the claim, so to ban him for making that claim was discrimination based on his medical condition.

I hope that when legalizing it, legislatures put in an exception to discrimination laws because even if you're being paid for it, you should have the right to refuse someone who wants to have sex with you. It's completely different than baking a cake or a gym.

 

[L. Ron Hubbard's Cat]

I hope that when legalizing it, legislatures put in an exception to discrimination laws because even if you're being paid for it, you should have the right to refuse someone who wants to have sex with you. It's completely different than baking a cake or a gym.

Yeah, there are a lot of considerations like that for legalized prostitution.

For instance, in some places you can't receive unemployment benefits/welfare if there are jobs available that you're qualified for. No one would ever intend to tell single mothers they have to work in brothels, but that's one technicality that needs to be addressed. And brothels almost exclusively employ women, so they'd be discriminating against men in their hiring practices. And so on and so forth, and that's assuming you're going with the same model Nevada went with and not just decriminalizing it, which would lead to a whole bunch of other considerations. None of these things are dealbreakers, necessarily, but they do illustrate that legalizing prostitution requires more thought than just applying for a business license.

 

[nemesisAF]

Even IF he got everything that he claims to find acceptable right now, he wouldn’t be satisfied. Government could even set up a disabled welfare system for pussy, but if ANYONE got a better deal off it than him, he would be furious. He gets pick-of the crowd ? None of those women would be good enough and he would still try to force a nonpro into a exclusive contract w him at the cheapest disabled rate.

He will never have someone both meet his standards and freely consent to his touch in anything but a transactional manner and he knows it. He wants the rewards of being handsome, clever, talented, charismatic, rich, etc, yet doesn’t even want to put in the work required to be pleasant, interesting, or caring. And he doesn’t see why he should have to- life owes him!

 

[DrJonesHat]

Even IF he got everything that he claims to find acceptable right now, he wouldn’t be satisfied. Government could even set up a disabled welfare system for pussy, but if ANYONE got a better deal off it than him, he would be furious. He gets pick-of the crowd ? None of those women would be good enough and he would still try to force a nonpro into a exclusive contract w him at the cheapest disabled rate.

He will never have someone both meet his standards and freely consent to his touch in anything but a transactional manner and he knows it. He wants the rewards of being handsome, clever, talented, charismatic, rich, etc, yet doesn’t even want to put in the work required to be pleasant, interesting, or caring. And he doesn’t see why he should have to- life owes him!

I think he'd bitch if anyone got a similar arrangement at all.

 

[Da Dude123]

Women have no agency in Russ’ mind. They’re not people, they’re possessions. If a woman is allowed to run wild and control her own destiny, she will make insane decisions, like all those silly women in the news articles he comments on, who got murdered by men they met at the club, instead of sensibly adding themselves to the harem of Nice Disabled Guy Russell Greer.

He gets stroppy if he sees an instathot being touched by a man in photos, even their own fathers. He hates the implication that they are already owned by another male, one Russ can’t negotiate with to gain access to the woman’s nethers. He wants a boyfriend/father/brother/male agent/male employer-free girl, one no male can claim prior ownership of...a wild solitary female he can take ownership of himself.

Women aren’t people to Russ. They’re pets owned by men. If you can find one running around by itself and no one owns it, you get to put a collar on it and keep it. It would be unethical to let it make its own decisions and live by itself, poor thing would die in the wilds without a man providing a better life.

Lucas Werner has a similar view of women. He thinks that the flatbill Gen Z men are keeping the zoomer girls from him. He mentions how they hoard the women and will also swoop in and snatch the women away if he is talking to them. The men are keeping the women away from him.

The women obviously should be all about Lucas Werner. He is plenty good. And the reason they aren't is because they are being hoarded by flatbill baseball cap wearing men and also they are being bigots. It's not that they don't want to date a filthy, fat, autistic hobo. Everyone else is conspiring against him.

While Lucas is not really keen on prostitutes. He will mention paying money to someone who "brings him a woman" . This woman better be between 18-22 years old and must really like him and be absolutely gorgeous. Lucas has also mentioned how the government should give him a girlfriend. Since they give him everything else. He is entitled to an attractive younger Gen Z girlfriend.

While Lucas has views that women basically don't have free will and should be passed over to him. He also claims to be a feminist and an ally to women. Lol! At least Rusty doesn't claim to be a feminist.

I often go back and forth on who is the worse cow Lucas Werner or Russell Greer. Overall, I think Lucas is worse, due to being a homeless guy for over a year. They are both super exceptional, but Rusty seems to be a bit higher functioning.

 

[AnOminous]

The only case he could drag them to court for and not get thrown out due to that contract is if he tried to argue that the arbitration portion of the contract was illegal. He'd still lose, but it'd be ruled on by a judge.

To get even that, he'll have to go to California, according to the terms of the contract.

These kinds of contract provisions are nearly inescapable, and none of the exceptions apply to Russhole. They might choose actually to litigate the case if just filing a motion to dismiss will dispose of the case permanently, especially if it's actually cheaper than arbitration. Russhole's case would be so moronically stupid that they probably have a brief already for such idiotic claims.

 

[Constellationzero]

That's the point, though. He believes he's entitled to service regardless of his behavior (if they'd just let him explain, they'd understand he wasn't a creep and they were actually in the wrong for being uncomfortable) and if they persist in refusing him, they're discriminating against him because he's disabled. He believes that since disabled people are legally entitled to the same treatment and access as non-disabled people, it means he gets whatever he wants, whenever he wants it. If a woman won't fuck an ugly man because he's ugly, that's fine -- but if he's ugly because he's disabled, she's legally compelled to fuck him. In Russ's head, the only reason anyone would deny him anything is because of anti-disabled bigotry, not because he doesn't deserve it, isn't entitled to it, or the person providing it simply doesn't feel like giving it to him.

For example, he used to frequent this tanning salon. He wanted the receptionist's phone number and she wouldn't give it to him. So he gave her his social media information and she didn't end up following him on Instagram. So he wrote a nasty review of the salon and how their staff was rude (and needed training in disability rights or sensitivity or something, iirc... I might be mixing up anecdotes here, as there are just so fucking many of them). He doesn't get that women have the right to say no to his explicit advances while they're at work, let alone that they might have the right to refuse him service because he's a fucking creep. And if they do, it's because they're bigots.

Legalized prostitution might be fantastic for the world overall, but for Russ it means that hookers would be legitimate businesses, and he can then bring the weight of the ADA down on them if they refuse him service. He did exactly that with Hof's brothels when he got banned for falsely claiming one of their girls had AIDS. His reasoning was that he has "anxiety" and that's why he made the claim, so to ban him for making that claim was discrimination based on his medical condition.

He's a lunatic, and also pretty stupid. What little brains he has are devoted to motivated reasoning and Dunning-Kruger. Any possible reality where Russ isn't totally correct, the very best at whatever he's trying to do, and wholly entitled to have him his penis sucked is to be avoided at all costs by his little rat-brain.

Yeah, that ADA shit gets on my nerves--particularly since I had to learn about it in grad school and there's a lot about it in state licensure testing for teaching.

Butternut gets equal ACCESS. The "bias" judge explained that to him. He even tardsplained it so Russell got to hear it on his own level. Equal access and equal opportunity.
No equity. No deferential treatment. No preferential treatment. Which means they absolutely can and will yeet his ass from the business if he makes others uncomfortable or he tards hard in front of everyone, which he does with stunning regularity.
And the ADA doesn't really apply to him anyway...except for employment. Reasonable accomodation. So they won't hire him to answer phones and he won't work a customer facing position, but he can do any other job they are hiring for or man assignments can be tweaked to fit him in.

Till he tards out again or follows another woman into the bathroom.

 

[DrJonesHat]

Yeah, that ADA shit gets on my nerves--particularly since I had to learn about it in grad school and there's a lot about it in state licensure testing for teaching.

Butternut gets equal ACCESS. The "bias" judge explained that to him. He even tardsplained it so Russell got to hear it on his own level. Equal access and equal opportunity.
No equity. No deferential treatment. No preferential treatment. Which means they absolutely can and will yeet his ass from the business if he makes others uncomfortable or he tards hard in front of everyone, which he does with stunning regularity.
And the ADA doesn't really apply to him anyway...except for employment. Reasonable accomodation. So they won't hire him to answer phones and he won't work a customer facing position, but he can do any other job they are hiring for or man assignments can be tweaked to fit him in.

Till he tards out again or follows another woman into the bathroom.

He truly thinks the ADA means they have to give him special treatment, not equal treatment. In his first TS lawsuit, he mentioned he wanted exceptions to the unsolicited works policy and expected to get them because of disability law. There are people more disabled than him who don't expect special treatment.

 

[moseph.jartelli]

Yeah, there are a lot of considerations like that for legalized prostitution.

For instance, in some places you can't receive unemployment benefits/welfare if there are jobs available that you're qualified for. No one would ever intend to tell single mothers they have to work in brothels, but that's one technicality that needs to be addressed. And brothels almost exclusively employ women, so they'd be discriminating against men in their hiring practices. And so on and so forth, and that's assuming you're going with the same model Nevada went with and not just decriminalizing it, which would lead to a whole bunch of other considerations. None of these things are dealbreakers, necessarily, but they do illustrate that legalizing prostitution requires more thought than just applying for a business license.

Good points, but I'd assume it would work the same as strip clubs now. They dont hire many men, nor tell single mothers they have to strip or get denied benefits. But either way those are goid points.

 

[AnOminous]

If the foundation of the suit is employment law, I think it would be dismissed on an even more fundamental basis than that. Violations of employment law are channeled through the EEOC. Before one can sue, a "right to sue" must be obtained from the EEOC by filing a claim, presenting the facts, and then receiving its ruling that the facts meet the necessary criteria (which is not a decision on the merits of the case, only that it falls under the jurisdiction of employment law.)

I don't know whether it would be dismissed or deferred, but I believe the first thing the judge would ask for is the EEOC decision. No decision, no case. It's back to Square One for our fine feeble friend. I wonder why this wasn't explained to Russ by his lawyer, whose ad he found pinned to a grocery store bulletin board.

Under some circumstances, they'll give you a right-to-sue letter before completing their investigation, but you have to request it and it's up to their discretion. If they decide they want to, they can also sue on your behalf if the case is particularly strong or for whatever reason they make these decisions (it seems pretty arbitrary at times). And their decision also generally says whether your complaint is valid, in their opinion.

In this case, this isn't even an employment discrimination case and Russ is too stupid to understand why.

I don't know about over there, but here a business has the right to refuse service to a customer that makes the workers feel uncomfortable. Has he never seen a business refuse service before?

It still can't be because they're uncomfortable for impermissible reasons, like he makes us uncomfortable because he's black, or he's a cripple. Russ's problem is he's a complete asshole, though, and that's not a protected category.

The idea that legalized prostitution might result in the women being free agents and having the power to turn away whomever they don’t care to service would be a nightmare for Russ. He'd never get laid again, outside of crackhead absolute bottom of the barrel hideous drug addict harpies looking for their next fix.

Even if they decriminalized or outright legalized prostitution, courts would probably still refuse to enforce prostitution contracts for public policy reasons, so if Russhole showed up with his money in hand and she decided he was just too ugly, smelly and disgusting to fuck, he still couldn't force her to go through with it. The most he'd get is a refund.

Women aren’t people to Russ. They’re pets owned by men. If you can find one running around by itself and no one owns it, you get to put a collar on it and keep it. It would be unethical to let it make its own decisions and live by itself, poor thing would die in the wilds without a man providing a better life.

So if a Wild Woman Appears, you just chuck Pokeballs at her until she's yours.

 

[Miss Misery]

Rusty needs to get in touch with one of those serial ADA lawsuit filing lawyers like Jason Singleton, Scott Johnson, or Peter Strojnik.

 

[AnOminous]

Rusty needs to get in touch with one of those serial ADA lawsuit filing lawyers like Jason Singleton, Scott Johnson, or Peter Strojnik.

Guys like that often already have a regular stable of clients who they send around fishing for ADA violations. The people they pick for that "Slippin' Jimmy" type role are generally savvy enough themselves to know what is an actual ADA violation. Since the public policy reason for punishing ADA violations is to make more places accessible, the courts are pretty tolerant of bottom feeders like this, figuring they serve a useful purpose even if they really are scumbags.

I.e. if a restaurant legitimately lacks wheelchair access, they don't care if the litigant is a serial filer or the attorney runs a litigation mill based on such claims, they just want them to put in wheelchair access.

 

[The Great Citracett]

 

[DrJonesHat]

It still can't be because they're uncomfortable for impermissible reasons, like he makes us uncomfortable because he's black, or he's a cripple. Russ's problem is he's a complete asshole, though, and that's not a protected category.

Falsely accusing a sex worker of having AIDS would definitely be grounds for refusing service. So would thinking she's your actual girlfriend and threatening all her male friends is also grounds.

 

[AnOminous]

Falsely accusing a sex worker of having AIDS would definitely be grounds for refusing service. So would thinking she's your actual girlfriend and threatening all her male friends is also grounds.

That would be grounds for a restraining order or a defamation lawsuit.

 

[DrJonesHat]

That would be grounds for a restraining order or a defamation lawsuit.

Didn't she get one against him? I know someone at one of the brothels did. The incident where he thought the hooker was his actual girlfriend shows he doesn't understand how hookers work at all. Like someone said, he thinks they're all auditioning boyfriends. Even if someone did take the time to explain how he was wrong, he'd just tune it out.

 

[Pee Cola]

I'll stick to my current method of getting laid even if it happens. It's called being a decent human being. Or at least better than butternut.

That's a pretty low bar, but it says more about Pipsqueak than it does about dudes that employ this method (myself included).