Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Fuck that shit, it's a trap.

"WE NEED MORE NIGGERS AND TRANNIES IN MOVIES AND MEDIA! HOW DARE YOU, A WHITE MALE, PORTRAY NIGGER AND TRANNIES WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING THEIR LIVED EXPERIENCES! YOU HAVE TO GROVEL AND PAY US 6 FIGURES TO BE SENSITIVITY READERS, SO WE CAN TELL YOU YOU A PIECE OF SHIT WHITE, STRAIGHT, CIS, MALE FOR AT LEAST 18 HOURS A DAY! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

It's not so much a trap, as a natural consequence of them acting out the unspoken bits. The unspoken bit being, of course, "fuck whitey," "fuck straight people," fuck normal people," and most importantly "FUCK U DAD."
 
I'm sure this article is old news, but it's new to me. What really makes me seethe is how it insists that "representation" should be a requirement for any work of fiction.

Whether someone wants diversity in their content, or how they implement it, or not should be up to them. Whether they care what their audience thinks or not is also up them. It's highly subjective all the way around! At least it should be. In my opinion.

What really got me was this small paragraph:


It reeks of shaming and guilt-tripping. My question for the author is this: Why do you care what someone does or not with their idea? I have my own answers to their questions within this paragraph.

Why are you so bound and determined to write a story with such a homogeneous cast?
Does it matter? Why do you care how I design my cast? If you don't like it, then don't read it! No one is forcing you to read or like my story.

What does this accomplish for you?
I'm writing the story how I want. I like it the way I made it. What's it to you? If you don't like it, that's fine. Go write your own story your way if you don't like mine.

Is the idea of doing something nice for people and having a positive impact on the world just that daunting?
I never realized I was drafted into being a humanitarian! It's not my job to validate minorities nor is it my problem if they don't feel represented in my story. I'm not out the get them, but I'm also not going to be guilt-tripped or bullied into making them feel good. I'm a writer not an aid worker.

I know the right tries to pull this shit too, but of course we see this more of this from the left today. They simply can't accept that they can't control people's imaginations. It's not up to them who writes what and how they write it. In fact, that goes for any kind of content. They don't get to dictate what people create. That's how it should be, but they're always trying all they can to thought police, censor, and control people.

Sorry for the autistic rant. That article pissed me off.
Notice how few non-villain Christians appear in their books.

The number of writing groups I have seen devolve into endless debates about the "right" way to write minorities. They absolutely can't see how brittle and one-dimensional they are making these characters and the people they are supposed to represent.
 
I'm sure this article is old news, but it's new to me. What really makes me seethe is how it insists that "representation" should be a requirement for any work of fiction.

Whether someone wants diversity in their content, or how they implement it, or not should be up to them. Whether they care what their audience thinks or not is also up them. It's highly subjective all the way around! At least it should be. In my opinion.

What really got me was this small paragraph:


It reeks of shaming and guilt-tripping. My question for the author is this: Why do you care what someone does or not with their idea? I have my own answers to their questions within this paragraph.

Why are you so bound and determined to write a story with such a homogeneous cast?
Does it matter? Why do you care how I design my cast? If you don't like it, then don't read it! No one is forcing you to read or like my story.

What does this accomplish for you?
I'm writing the story how I want. I like it the way I made it. What's it to you? If you don't like it, that's fine. Go write your own story your way if you don't like mine.

Is the idea of doing something nice for people and having a positive impact on the world just that daunting?
I never realized I was drafted into being a humanitarian! It's not my job to validate minorities nor is it my problem if they don't feel represented in my story. I'm not out the get them, but I'm also not going to be guilt-tripped or bullied into making them feel good. I'm a writer not an aid worker.

I know the right tries to pull this shit too, but of course we see this more of this from the left today. They simply can't accept that they can't control people's imaginations. It's not up to them who writes what and how they write it. In fact, that goes for any kind of content. They don't get to dictate what people create. That's how it should be, but they're always trying all they can to thought police, censor, and control people.

Sorry for the autistic rant. That article pissed me off.
It's okay. You're feeling the same way I did about that bit with Tolkien Society and how LOTR needs 'diversity'.

The whole thing is just a laundry list of 'muh feelings'. But I'd like to point this one out in particular:

"The audience just doesn't want it." Yes, they do! Countless people ask for more representation every day. Maybe part of your audience really doesn't care about it, but why only worry about them when you could be appealing to a far wider audience?

What wider audience? This is the phenomenon I call 'chasing the phantom demographic'. If there's no audience for your work, it will not gain popularity. The end. It's like the dog food analogy. It doesn't matter if you have the catchiest jingles or the best ads; if dogs won't eat the dog food nobody will buy it.

And when the work fails, just blame evil cishet wypipo for being 'haters'.
 
What wider audience? This is the phenomenon I call 'chasing the phantom demographic'. If there's no audience for your work, it will not gain popularity. The end. It's like the dog food analogy. It doesn't matter if you have the catchiest jingles or the best ads; if dogs won't eat the dog food nobody will buy it.

And when the work fails, just blame evil cishet wypipo for being 'haters'.
SJWs typically care a lot more about hypothetical people who are like themselves over the billions of real people who are not themselves. It goes to show you how much they want the world to be reduced to just themselves and the mirror.
 
SJWs typically care a lot more about hypothetical people who are like themselves over the billions of real people who are not themselves. It goes to show you how much they want the world to be reduced to just themselves and the mirror.
The real irony of that is that they project their racial self-loathing onto other people they perceive as "white", and they're absolutely infuriated about the smallest differences in opinion amongst those that have the greatest overlap in opinion. I can't remember what the phenomenon is called, but I've seen studies that show that people became angrier at small differences in thought within self-chosen groups, than with differences with out-group. I.E. - an SJW while despise another SJW more, if they don't exactly agree on how much why have to give to troons to "protect, validate, and affirm them", than they will with someone that isn't Woko Haram thinkihng that trannies should be allowed to live their lives, but get no special treatment.

I'm sure the underlying phenomenon boils down to Woko Haram somehow being able to internally rationalize some kind of dehumanization for anyone that isn't part of their self-selected ideological tribe, but the cognitive dissonance is much worse when the heresy is from within the tribe,.
 
The real irony of that is that they project their racial self-loathing onto other people they perceive as "white", and they're absolutely infuriated about the smallest differences in opinion amongst those that have the greatest overlap in opinion.
SJWism is about power over others, and so it only works on people who care what SJWs think about them, either because they legitimately care or because they're subject to some form of cancellation. So for instance an openly Roman saluting Nazi is not going to give a fuck if you call him a Nazi. He'll just say yeah I'm a Nazi, what are you going to do about it, bitch?

They don't like actually interacting with such people because it just underscores how actually powerless they are. They don't get their dopamine rush unless their target cucks to them.
 
Can’t people just enjoy things?
1623599347909.png
 
Reread an article last night on the topic of leftist tolerance politics and the author is a complete loon but he had a line I felt like summarized their postions well:
"There is room for the mad cows but not the Indian Sacred Cow."

He argues that social survival is not too different than darwinism and that progressives are just trying to make the shitty group survive but it forces them to edge out the good one.
 
I don't get why someone called him a cuck? He didn't apologize giving money to Republicans and even stated he was pro-life and won't apologize for it.

I say that's better than someone like Elle Kemper's response to the mob
Think they meant the guy whining about it on Twitter. I don't see how anyone could call doubling down a fuck move - unless, of course, it's on the amount of bulls in your bedroom.
 
Can’t people just enjoy things?
View attachment 2258308
White people are getting homework from Jonita just so she can fail them no matter what they do.

Instead of doing "homework" on some faggot convention I'll just do some actual homework and learn a new skill/get a degree/not be a worthless piece of shit.
 
White people are getting homework from Jonita just so she can fail them no matter what they do.

Instead of doing "homework" on some faggot convention I'll just do some actual homework and learn a new skill/get a degree/not be a worthless piece of shit.
Don't you fucking dare learn for yourself or engage in any activity that improves skill. That's like the most racist and xenophobic thing you can do.
 
"White is whoever we think is white."

beelcher
m · 2020-12-15
#hispanic #latino #whitepassinglatinos #whitepassingpoc #whitepassing #fyp
Also, why do so many people who make videos like this have their fire alarm battery going off? How do they not go absolutely psychotically insane from the noise and burn down the whole neighborhood?

fatty.thickums
tay · 2020-12-14
Reply to @fortvalley #greenscreen i’m just white tho huh. #whitepassingpoc #GoodMorning #CancelTheNoise
original sound - tay
 
Also, why do so many people who make videos like this have their fire alarm battery going off? How do they not go absolutely psychotically insane from the noise and burn down the whole neighborhood?
I mean if you're already psychotic from reading twitter rage bait then you're probably numb to every stimulus going off in your vicinity.
 
You know these SJWs remind me of the reapers from Mass Effect, Tyranids from Warhammer 40K and Lovecraft horror:

You can't reason with them, they're a hive mind where your either with them, or any kind of deviation results in your banishment, doxxing, losing your job, run you out of town , etc.... And their always hungry to find the next rascist so they can beat and abuse to their heart's content while acting like a woman: "I'm just punching him because he was a racsist" "Oh I didn't do that""I didn't say that".

And your not just dealing with dyed hair hipster socialists working from starbucks who fancy themselves as revolutionaries, you also have doctors, lawyers, police, bankers and government who believe these SJWS: America is rascist, everything is unequal, everybody has to do the greater good, etc...
 
Last edited:
The real irony of that is that they project their racial self-loathing onto other people they perceive as "white", and they're absolutely infuriated about the smallest differences in opinion amongst those that have the greatest overlap in opinion. I can't remember what the phenomenon is called, but I've seen studies that show that people became angrier at small differences in thought within self-chosen groups, than with differences with out-group. I.E. - an SJW while despise another SJW more, if they don't exactly agree on how much why have to give to troons to "protect, validate, and affirm them", than they will with someone that isn't Woko Haram thinkihng that trannies should be allowed to live their lives, but get no special treatment.

I'm sure the underlying phenomenon boils down to Woko Haram somehow being able to internally rationalize some kind of dehumanization for anyone that isn't part of their self-selected ideological tribe, but the cognitive dissonance is much worse when the heresy is from within the tribe,.
It's partly outgroup homogeneity (believing people within your group have different views while those outside all basically think the same), but I don't remember if there's a specific term for the anger being focused within the group. It would basically be seeing the outgroup's perceived homogeneity as a strength while your own group's indecisiveness would drive you crazy.
 
Back