The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

The child growing inside the mother also has a right to bodily integrity, yet you argue against it. Again, you just want a puss-puss without having to deal with 9 months of pregnancy and 18 years of child-rearing. It's kind of amazing that you don't want to use protection either. Free sex is a hell of a drug, eh? Do you actually get sex? Or do you white knight for m'ladies in hopes that some of them notice you?

Birth control fails. I don't specifically want women to get abortions, but they should have the option if they so choose. And it doesn't matter, you still don't respect women's body autonomy.

And I have a girlfriend, so I get sex pretty regularly. She's on birth control. If I was gonna white knight for m'ladies to try and get laid, arguing with right-wing retards from Russia like you on Kiwi Farms would not be my chosen venue for doing so.

A baby shouldn't be killed just because atheist, degenerate progtards like you want it to be.

I don't specifically want abortions but a woman should have the choice. Not everyone is Catholic. If you don't want an abortion, don't get one, but don't force your religious shit on us

 

[Vince McMahon]

Birth control fails

So have less sex? If you have a loving partner, I'm pretty sure you can make it so that you maximize your chances of not having a baby, if you don't want to have one.

And yet you still want to murder kids, trying to soothe (or maybe you don't have it at all, that remains to be seen) your conscience with soundbites like "clump of cells".

And I have a girlfriend, so I get sex pretty regularly. She's on birth control. If I was gonna white knight for m'ladies to try and get laid, arguing with right-wing retards from Russia like you on Kiwi Farms would not be my chosen venue for doing so.

I don't know man. Judging from your modus operandi on Kiwi Farms, you have a lot of pent-up frustration and negative energy. If I didn't know any better, I'd think you're an actual incel trying to camouflage yourself with this bullshit rhetoric to get some pussy. Stranger things have happened, man.
I mean, if you have deep psychological issues - regular sex is not going to solve them for you. Do you get therapy?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

So have less sex? If you have a loving partner, I'm pretty sure you can make it so that you maximize your chances of not having a baby, if you don't want to have one.

Lol nah, sex is fun. You should try getting laid, it's fun.

And yet you still want to murder kids, trying to soothe (or maybe you don't have it at all, that remains to be seen) your conscience with soundbites like "clump of cells".

Good thing abortion isn't murder then, right?

I don't know man. Judging from your modus operandi on Kiwi Farms, you have a lot of pent-up frustration and negative energy. If I didn't know any better, I'd think you're an actual incel trying to camouflage yourself with this bullshit rhetoric to get some pussy. Stranger things have happened, man.
I mean, if you have deep psychological issues - regular sex is not going to solve them for you. Do you get therapy?

Sorry that I get sex regularly and you don't. I know it makes you even more seething mad. However, if you keep up not respecting women's body autonomy and thinking of them as nothing more than baby making machines, no woman is going to let you touch her, and I can't blame her. If I was going to white knight to try and get laid (lol what a stupid concept), KF would be the last place on the list I would do so at.

Then again, since you seem to have a fetish for fat old white men like the other right-wing tards on here, maybe you don't care about touching women but want those old men instead. Just be yourself, man. It's okay to be gay. Well, maybe not in Russia, but move elsewhere and then live your best life and find a nice fat old man to settle down with

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Sorry that I get sex regularly

Sorry I'm not in a state of mortal sin.

 

[Vince McMahon]

Lol nah, sex is fun. You should try getting laid, it's fun.

Seeing you and how you talk to people on this forum, makes me think that it rots your brain or something.

Good thing abortion isn't murder then, right?

You're still killing a child. Just because you're not committing a crime against the state doesn't mean you're not doing anything wrong.

I know it makes you even more seething mad.

This is your only gotcha because you must assure yourself that if someone's against abortion, they don't have enough sex. Do you realize that you sound like a proper incel? Tell me, what's your handle on incels.is? Do you call other people Chad when no one's looking?

Then again, since you seem to have a fetish for fat old white men like the other right-wing tards on here, maybe you don't care about touching women but want those old men instead. Just be yourself, man. It's okay to be gay. Well, maybe not in Russia, but move elsewhere and then live your best life and find a nice fat old man to settle down with

Du bist so besessen von uneingeschränkter Sexualität, dass du buchstäblich wie ein 15-jähriger Teenager aus dem Bible Belt klingst (na ja, wie Liberale gewöhnlich "sexuell unterdrückte Kinder" darstellen).

Es ist so beeindruckend, dass du buchstäblich unfähig bist, zu verstehen, wie oft du wie eine herzlose, leere und fade Fotze aussiehst.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Sorry I'm not in a state of mortal sin.

Good thing I am not religious. I know you want to outlaw pre-martial sex because you believe in a Catholic version of Sharia law, but most of us don't want that.

Seeing you and how you talk to people on this forum, makes me think that it rots your brain or something.

Not as much as being into fat old men does, as evidenced by your posts.

You're still killing a child. Just because you're not committing a crime against the state doesn't mean you're not doing anything wrong.

It's not killing a child, despite what you religious retards say.

This is your only gotcha because you must assure yourself that if someone's against abortion, they don't have enough sex. Do you realize that you sound like a proper incel? Tell me, what's your handle on incels.is? Do you call other people Chad when no one's looking?

Lol you're the one who wants to punish women for having sex with guys who aren't you and thinks of them as nothing more than baby factories. Yeah, I am totally the incel though (that's sarcasm since you obviously have autism and can't detect it). Incels like you are idiots. Getting laid is not that hard, you just can't be a retard who thinks of women as nothing more than baby factories and doesn't respect their body autonomy. Those things don't help your cause. I mean, not your cause because you're into fat old men, but if you were into women.

Du bist so besessen von uneingeschränkter Sexualität, dass du buchstäblich wie ein 15-jähriger Teenager aus dem Bible Belt klingst (na ja, wie Liberale gewöhnlich "sexuell unterdrückte Kinder" darstellen).

Es ist so beeindruckend, dass du buchstäblich unfähig bist, zu verstehen, wie oft du wie eine herzlose, leere und fade Fotze aussiehst.

Oh, so you're German?

Either way, based on your history here, it's pretty obvious you're a right-wing retard who gets really, really mad easily when people aren't right-wing retards like you. Sorry it's hard for you to come out of the closet, but you should just be yourself. It's okay to be gay. The Hulkster supports you

 

[Billy Beer]

Women should not be able to terminate otherwise healthy children produced from willing sexual intercourse

Says who? You? Wind your neck in

having a fulfilling life and decrease your sexual activity

Why? Sex is good. Try it some time

18 years of child-rearing

Do you kill all kids at the age of 18?

A baby shouldn't be killed just because atheist, degenerate progtards like you want it to be.

It's not a baby, and under what circumstances should a baby be killed?

So have less sex?

Have less sex to protect your feelings?

makes me think that it rots your brain or something.

Virgin confirmed

You're still killing a child.

It's not a child.

Why some people get so pent up over abortion is confusing. Who cares if someone gets knocked up and terminates it? It isn't your kid, womb or partner. Mind your own business.

And if you're so pissed off about people dying, or being killed, what are you doing to prevent that on a wider scale? Are you 100% green? Do you assist the elderly or protest wars? Do you and your community get together to offer free sex advice to strangers? Feed the homeless? Help the poor? Protect wild-life?

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Who cares if someone gets knocked up and terminates it? It isn't your kid, womb or partner. Mind your own business.

I agree. Let's never do anything about crimes against children ever again.

 

[Kerr Avon]

Birth control can fail.

Birth control fails.

True , both your posts are outstanding evidence of just such an occurrence.

 

[Billy Beer]

I agree. Let's never do anything about crimes against children ever again.

except they aren't children. It's a parasite for many months

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

True , both your posts are outstanding evidence of just such an occurrence.

Sorry but your mom's birth control failed when I didn't pull out

 

[Zero Day Defense]

except they aren't children. It's a parasite for many months

Did you fail high school biology, or are you from r/childfree?

Not to mention, this has nothing to do with the logic of yours that I highlighted. If those are the reasons why we shouldn't care what happens to other people's children, we shouldn't criminalize misdeeds against children or even consider them "misdeeds" in the first place.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

under what circumstances should a baby be killed?

Never. Do you want to go around killing babies?

 

[Billy Beer]

Did you fail high school biology, or are you from r/childfree?

You could fail it? And no, to both.

Not to mention, this has nothing to do with the logic of yours that I highlighted. If those are the reasons why we shouldn't care what happens to other people's children, we shouldn't criminalize misdeeds against children or even consider them "misdeeds" in the first place.

It's not children. You say children but it isn't children. But i feel that we will never get passed the point of 'four week old bunch of cells does not equal a human'.

Experiments have been done on human brains and we know roughly, how long it takes for conciousness - argued as 'a person', develops. Before consciousness it's nothingness.

Never. Do you want to go around killing babies?

Only when they cry on planes, in restaurants and in cinemas. Though i also want to figuratively kill the parents as well

 

[Zero Day Defense]

You could fail it? And no, to both.

You're not very convincing.

It's not children. You say children but it isn't children.

Except they are. They're human offspring that haven't yet reached maturity. They most certainly aren't

an organism that lives in or on an organism of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense.

 

[Vince McMahon]

how long it takes for conciousness - argued as 'a person', develops.

Now, of course, you can provide the proof. Because we only charted brainwaves from babies and arbitrarily decided that consciousness starts there, but the comatose state also provides brainwaves and yet, that is not considered an indicator of consciousness.

 

[Billy Beer]

You're not very convincing.

Convincing? I'm not trying to win a debate, just chucking in my PoV, for better or worse

Except they are. They're human offspring that haven't yet reached maturity. They most certainly aren't

Trust Science! TBH, i couldn't give a fuck what level of alive they are. If they're under 24 weeks, flush that shit down the toilet, mix it with chemicals and make it drinking water

Now, of course, you can provide the proof. Because we only charted brainwaves from babies and arbitrarily decided that consciousness starts there, but the comatose state also provides brainwaves and yet, that is not considered an indicator of consciousness.

I can't provide the proof because I'm too lazy and don't care about others' opinions on a topic like this, because when it comes down to it, we aren't going to change one-anothers mind. It's just a good excuse to shit post.

Though i do find it very very very very very strange why anti-abortionists are such [fascists? dictators?] when it comes to who can have an abortion and why. Someone else having an abortion does not impact your life as much as someone bringing a child to term.

Do any anti-abortionists ever ask the children who weren't aborted whether they want to live or die? Because it's pretty fucking cruel to:

force a woman to term who doesn't want a kid
who ends up having a spaz child
who can't properly care for spaz child
who doesn't love spaz child
all while spaz child suffers emotional and physical pain and torture all day, every day of their miserable lives.

To allow that to happen is much colder than vacuuming out a 4 month old giant sperm

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Do any anti-abortionists ever ask the children who weren't aborted whether they want to live or die? Because it's pretty fucking cruel to:

force a woman to term who doesn't want a kid
who ends up having a spaz child
who can't properly care for spaz child
who doesn't love spaz child
all while spaz child suffers emotional and physical pain and torture all day, every day of their miserable lives.

To allow that to happen is much colder than vacuuming out a 4 month old giant sperm

Did you know that there was a group of people in history who thought that letting the disabled live was crueler than aborting them? In fact, I'll leave one of their posters here:

 

[Vince McMahon]

force a woman to term who doesn't want a kid

Should've thought that before spreading her legs.

who ends up having a spaz child

Millions of people end up having disabled children and do their best to raise them and take care of them.

who can't properly care for spaz child

What's proper care? And besides, adoption does exist. If it was the 17th century, then maybe your argument was valid but even then, the church took care of a lot of orphans.

who doesn't love spaz child

Well, if she doesn't love her child, tough shit. The least she can do is take care of him/her and not let them die.

all while spaz child suffers emotional and physical pain and torture all day, every day of their miserable lives.

pfft, such a fragile attempt at emotional manipulation.

 

[Billy Beer]

Should've thought that before spreading her legs.

You aren't the sex police, but you do sound like an incel/virgin

Millions of people end up having disabled children and do their best to raise them and take care of them.

Millions of people would have aborted them, given the heads up and chance

What's proper care? And besides, adoption does exist. If it was the 17th century, then maybe your argument was valid but even then, the church took care of a lot of orphans.

So, terminating a pregnancy way before full term is horrible, nasty, yuck, ewwww. But dropping a spaz kid on the steps of a nunnery when they're a week old is A-Okay? And you see no problem with that?

Well, if she doesn't love her child, tough shit. The least she can do is take care of him/her and not let them die.

Jesus Christ. You're willing to ruin two lives, at a minimum, because ucky yucky wominz having sex and getting an abortion hurts your fee fees? Wearelaughing.gif

pfft, such a fragile attempt at emotional manipulation.

No emotional manipulation, just the cold, hard, facts of life. Many people commit suicide, self-abortion, if you will. Many of those people are physically and/or emotionally handicapped.