Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Are you talking about the seat being level with your keyboard? If so you are a monster.

I'm using an old lazy boy since it's comfortable to sit on and if I work too late into the night/ day I can just sleep on it. I need an actual office chair one of these days.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Poser.

The correct word would be DENIAL. There's no attempt to write a narrative, so you're incorrect to label it "gaslighting". But I'm more educated on the topic of narcissism than you, so obviously I can spot these things faster.

You're not even using "Exhibit" correctly because you're not involved in a lawsuit.

Narcissistic gaslighting

#TAG; EXHIBIT

(I probably have a better chance at winning this lawsuit, and I’m not even involved!)

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Narcissistic gaslighting

#TAG; EXHIBIT

(I probably have a better chance at winning this lawsuit, and I’m not even involved!)

I'm pretty sure the shit my cat took earlier could win this case.

 

[Cup Noodle]

I'm using an old lazy boy since it's comfortable to sit on and if I work too late into the night/ day I can just sleep on it. I need an actual office chair one of these days.

I have a epic gaming chair made for super fat Americans. I'm 6'4" and the damn thing is just right as low as it will go. It's fucking huge and I love it. I guess the chinks think that if you are 400 pounds you are like 8 feet tall. I'm 200 and enjoying the luxury. I fall asleep in this son of a bitch more than I would like to admit.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Narcissistic gaslighting

#TAG; EXHIBIT

(I probably have a better chance at winning this lawsuit, and I’m not even involved!)

Why do you just copy and paste what I wrote to another person?

Also, you've had the same Avatar for 16 months. Seems like a duplicate account.

I'm in a loving relationship

Highly doubt.

You don't even know what love is, so there's no way you're even capable of having a loving relationship.

A cordial one? Maybe. Loving? Impossible.

What kind of porn have you caught Marshall watching, Melinda?

I've never had to "catch" him watching porn because he's never used it in secret around me.

Marshall isn't a regular porn user he is a retaliatory porn user, which is a typical fighting tactic with men: they watch porn in retaliation to try to strike back. It's happened when I asked him to leave my house (kicked him out during a fight) or tried to break up with him in the past. He sat at home and did it out of anger. It doesn't bother me because at the root of it the person's inability to have empathy for how the have hurt their SO. They turn away from the relationship out of anger, instead of inward to heal what they broke. It's the person's issue, not mine.

Boy, if I watched porn every time Marshall pissed me off...but I don't...because I reject porn as a matter of moral principle. Even though certain categories of pornography appeal to me very much, and I could easily get into a pattern of watching it, I fight the temptation and exercise self control.

I don't think a lot of people realize how tempting pornography is for women too. Women are just as sexual as men, although often sexually repressed from societal brainwashing. I've read studies that suggest women are actually MORE visually stimulated than men. Women are visual though, for sure.

Depends on when the study was done. Before 2015, you'll see a lot of the old theories because of all the cultural attitudes towards women and sex. After 2015, when they did studies with more variety of images the researchers all came to the reality with newer conclusions: women are just as visually stimulated as men.

Things must be going poorly with Marshall, you are, once again, trying to advertise your sexuality on kiwi farms. Once again, you are failing in your attempt. No one is going to see your words on kiwi farms and swoop in to scoop you off of your feet and award you a homestead in exchange for anal sex.

Basic statements about sexuality are not advertisements. I don't have any desire to find a match through statements on Kiwis Farms. There's dating APPs for that kind of thing.

Someone's sexuality is just as much a part of that person as other aspects of their life. I don't see any difference between someone talking about what they ate for lunch and saying their lingerie arrived in the mail.

Talking about basic elements of sexuality, even publicly, in a mature, adult manner is part of the human experience. Joking about sex and sexuality publicly is part of the human experience. I don't see anything wrong with it. As long as someone doesn't cross the line and they save the deeper details for personal relationships. Like, for example, no one needs to hear publicly the details of my sexual fantasies.

I had this messianic person text me after s/he found the Kiwi Farms thread and one of their objections to how I responded to you guys was how I spoke about my sexuality. I laughed because 45% of The Hebrew Bible is about sex, and in very graphic ways. Don't read the Bible then!

I always find it funny how saying the word "vagina" publicly in the context of a philosophical discussion can make people go in an uproar but a person who broadcasts the deepest inner details of their heart and thoughts on YouTube with their face 2 inches from the camera is considered "just another day on the internet" -- when in actuality sharing someone's deepest thoughts and feelings with their face up close and their voice in your ear buds is way more intimate than a philosophical discussion about sexuality.

 

[super thug]

She doesn't realize how the whiteboard thing would be like rubbing salt in a wound. I feel so bad for those poor kids.

 

[Toasty]

She doesn't realize how the whiteboard thing would be like rubbing salt in a wound. I feel so bad for those poor kids.

She probably took the picture with the wiped off day while she was changing it, then pretended Marshall did it because he's being petty. All while failing to see how petty her little count down sign is.

 

[White Baby]

You don't even know what love is, so there's no way you're even capable of having a loving relationship

Pot.. kettle.. how does that saying go again?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

She probably took the picture with the wiped off day while she was changing it, then pretended Marshall did it because he's being petty. All while failing to see how petty her little count down sign is.

Being one is kind of an advantage, you're right.

Pot.. kettle.. how does that saying go again?

You try to fight like a grade schooler at recess

How old are you?

 

[White Baby]

You try to fight like a grade schooler at recess

How old are you?

Imagine putting effort into arguing with an insane woman on the online.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Highly doubt.

You don't even know what love is, so there's no way you're even capable of having a loving relationship.

A cordial one? Maybe. Loving? Impossible.

Not everyone is you Melinda. You think the way Marshall has treaded you all these years is "love" because you're so desperate to be wanted by a man. Your understanding of love is just as bad as Andrews.

I have a epic gaming chair made for super fat Americans. I'm 6'4" and the damn thing is just right as low as it will go. It's fucking huge and I love it. I guess the chinks think that if you are 400 pounds you are like 8 feet tall. I'm 200 and enjoying the luxury. I fall asleep in this son of a bitch more than I would like to admit.

This is my grandfathers old chair, I've been using it for over twenty years now. Got it reupholstered once. Once I get into a new office I'm going to put it in the corner by my books or put it in the library.

Pot.. kettle.. how does that saying go again?

If she can't do it it's an impossible task. One has to remember that she thinks she's perfect and the best in the world.

 

[LoverofPi]

Can I just say I am very amused by how Mel is now claiming to know more about narcissism than anyone else here, to be an expert on it while still not using most of the associated terminology even close to correctly.

I'd nominate her for the boardwide exemplar of Dunning-Kruger, but there's some stiff competition out there. She's definitely in the running, though.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

You don't even know what love is, so there's no way you're even capable of having a loving relationship.

You have never had a successful romantic relationship throughout the course of your entire adult life. You have no idea what love is, or how it feels to give and receive love from a romantic relationship. You reduce everything to a transactional state, while being drawn to partners with low emotional (and intellectual, and economic) value. But I'm sure a dating app will solve all of your woes. Certainly you won't attract another mouth-breather without a paternal bone in his body drawn like a moth to your children's welfare checks.

PS: Has Marshall paid you back a single penny of the stimulus money you "lent" him? Do you really think that he will? Or is it going to be like the times you left Marshall and he never so much as called to see how his children (both his real children and his "spiritual" children) are doing? You'll be waiting a long time for either those phone calls or any of that money, I'll bet.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

because you're so desperate to be wanted by a man

I've never stated anything alluding to that. That's a made up fantasy as part of your Patriarchal World Order.

One of the tenents of Patriarchy is the false belief that all women want the love of a man (in a romantic context). Your archaic world view is so ignorant and backwards that you can't even conceive the idea that women can have other top priorities besides a man.

The notion that a woman could have sex with a man without emotional attachment causes you such a narcissistic injury that you're willing to go online and socially abuse a woman just to soothe that narcissistic injury.

Oh boy!

to be an expert on it while still not using most of the associated terminology even close to correctly.

That's your claim but you have still yet to present any facts to support your claim while I on the other hand have repeatedly shown specific comments demonstrating that you're narcissistically abusing people on KiwiFarms.net.

I've studied Narcissism for 9 years, whereas you on the other hand actually have malignant narcissistic qualities yet lack the self awareness to notice that you and your fellow cult peers here are actually narcissistically abusing people on KiwiFarms.net.

I'm lightening years ahead of you when it comes to Truth, Wisdom and understanding Narcissism. But by all means, continue to argue with me with baselesd claims. You're only feeding my feelings of grandiosity as YHWH's Elect every single time you do that.

You have never had a successful romantic relationship throughout the course of your entire adult life

Presuming this is true, let me follow up with the million dollar question I was taught in high school and college to ask: "SO WHAT?"

I notice throughout this thread that you have a preoccupation with social connections. You see someone's entire well being (co-)dependent on whether or not they have this relationship, that relationship, or the other. While people are indeed social creatures, your unhealthy fixation on social relationships being the be all, end all of someone's inner peace, happiness and well being is misguided.

I am the master of my own happiness and well being, independent of anyone else. I am my primary source of love, approval, and acceptance. My inner peace does not depend on anyone else.

Your inability to understand self partnering is your biggest folly.

You have no idea what love is,

Facts to support your claim?

Or this is another narcissistic narrative?

You have no idea [] how it feels to give and receive love from a romantic relationship

Not factually accurate

Many of my exes actually did indeed love me in an emotional way. I stated that before.

Marshall actually is capable of showing more emotional love than nearly all the exes. I stated that before too.

It's not a man's lack of love that can drive a woman away. Statistically, many women divorce men that still have love feelings for.

I find this funny when people always tell me my breakups are an issue with love. It's like people are completely blind to the fact that women are looking for RESPECT. "Women want love, men want respect" is the oldest stupid lie that limits and dooms many relationships.

You reduce everything to a transactional state

Facts to support your claim?

while being drawn to partners with low emotional (and intellectual, and economic) value

Who are you to be telling anyone what their "value" is?

Imagine putting effort into arguing with an insane woman on the online.

And yet you fight tooth and nail for your narcissistic narratives.

You claim to not be a covetous woman who supports the achievements of other women...

I do celebrate the success of other women who have actually put their nose to the grindstone and become coherent, hardworking professionals, regardless of race or education.

...yet this is so obviously clearly untrue when you historically sit here trying to attack me with narcissistic narratives on a thread that you know my spouse reads. The Dr.'s husband isn't here so it's easy for you to pretend you're not jealous of her.

Your own history of failed relationships makes you desperate to mar Marshall's view of me, that's why you type the way you do. I see through you.

The witch Burnt Toast does the same thing. Both of you are single, bitter women. Funny that none of my married friends and acquaintances say anything like you 2 do.

Nobody would attack someone with narcissistic narratives in them of they didn't have bitter covetousness in their bones. You can't even figure out how to get a man, let alone keep one, so you are desperate for my relationship with Marshall to go badly and for him to have a bad view of me to try to make yourself feel better and I see your jealousy in ever false narcissistic narrative you type.

I can see through you like a freshly wiped window after being wiped with Windex.

Stay true to your colors Christian lady. You don't surprise me!

 

[Chariot Of Mara]

I've never stated anything alluding to that. That's a made up fantasy as part of your Patriarchal World Order.

One of the tenents of Patriarchy is the false belief that all women want the love of a man (in a romantic context). Your archaic world view is so ignorant and backwards that you can't even conceive the idea that women can have other top priorities besides a man.

The notion that a woman could have sex with a man without emotional attachment causes you such a narcissistic injury that you're willing to go online and socially abuse a woman just to soothe that narcissistic injury.

Oh boy!


That's your claim but you have still yet to present any facts to support your claim while I on the other hand have repeatedly shown specific comments demonstrating that you're narcissistically abusing people on KiwiFarms.net.

I've studied Narcissism for 9 years, whereas you on the other hand actually have malignant narcissistic qualities yet lack the self awareness to notice that you and your fellow cult peers here are actually narcissistically abusing people on KiwiFarms.net.

I'm lightening years ahead of you when it comes to Truth, Wisdom and understanding Narcissism. But by all means, continue to argue with me with baselesd claims. You're only feeding my feelings of grandiosity as YHWH's Elect every single time you do that.




Presuming this is true, let me follow up with the million dollar question I was taught in high school and college to ask: "SO WHAT?"

I notice throughout this thread that you have a preoccupation with social connections. You see someone's entire well being (co-)dependent on whether or not they have this relationship, that relationship, or the other. While people are indeed social creatures, your unhealthy fixation on social relationships being the be all, end all of someone's inner peace, happiness and well being is misguided.

I am the master of my own happiness and well being, independent of anyone else. I am my primary source of love, approval, and acceptance. My inner peace does not depend on anyone else.

Your inability to understand self partnering is your biggest folly.


Facts to support your claim?

Or this is another narcissistic narrative?




Not factually accurate

Many of my exes actually did indeed love me in an emotional way. I stated that before.

Marshall actually is capable of showing more emotional love than nearly all the exes. I stated that before too.

It's not a man's lack of love that can drive a woman away. Statistically, many women divorce men that still have love feelings for.

I find this funny when people always tell me my breakups are an issue with love. It's like people are completely blind to the fact that women are looking for RESPECT. "Women want love, men want respect" is the oldest stupid lie that limits and dooms many relationships.




Facts to support your claim?




Who are you to be telling anyone what their "value" is?





And yet you fight tooth and nail for your narcissistic narratives.

You claim to not be a covetous woman who supports the achievements of other women...


...yet this is so obviously clearly untrue when you historically sit here trying to attack me with narcissistic narratives on a thread that you know my spouse reads. The Dr.'s husband isn't here so it's easy for you to pretend you're not jealous of her.

Your own history of failed relationships makes you desperate to mar Marshall's view of me, that's why you type the way you do. I see through you.

The witch Burnt Toast does the same thing. Both of you are single, bitter women. Funny that none of my married friends and acquaintances say anything like you 2 do.

Nobody would attack someone with narcissistic narratives in them of they didn't have bitter covetousness in their bones. You can't even figure out how to get a man, let alone keep one, so you are desperate for my relationship with Marshall to go badly and for him to have a bad view of me to try to make yourself feel better and I see your jealousy in ever false narcissistic narrative you type.

I can see through you like a freshly wiped window after being wiped with Windex.

Stay true to your colors Christian lady. You don't surprise me!

Excuse me, but fnaarf only celebrates women that have done hard work and are professionals. You definitely don’t fit this category, so what she claims is still true. Maybe a professional at making a fool of yourself, but definitely not worthy of celebration for popping out societal burdens and whining about your relationships on a forum you’re trying to sue.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

I notice throughout this thread that you have a preoccupation with social connections. You see someone's entire well being (co-)dependent on whether or not they have this relationship, that relationship, or the other. While people are indeed social creatures, your unhealthy fixation on social relationships being the be all, end all of someone's inner peace, happiness and well being is misguided.

Wrong. your past history of social relationships with others, along with your economic relationships and intellectual relationships, all add up to present both a coherent image of who you are, and allow me to make educated guesses about what you will do in the future. That is why they are so important.

I am the master of my own happiness and well being, independent of anyone else. I am my primary source of love, approval, and acceptance. My inner peace does not depend on anyone else.

Your inability to understand self partnering is your biggest folly.

Oh, if only this were true. You have created six children solely to give you love. Unquestioning, dependent love. Your inner peace depends so strongly on this that you have refused them entry into the wider world and society at large. They are the hostages in your drama.

 

[Deadpool]

I'm lightening years ahead of you

Lightening years isn't a thing you stupid bitch. It's light years.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Lightening years isn't a thing you stupid bitch. It's light years.

Sorry, but I'd say she's got the drop on you there. Quite a head start, so to speak.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

I think my uterus just dropped, along with my monocle.

 

[Pizdec]

You try to fight like a grade schooler at recess

How old are you?

Don't you have anything better to do? LOL