I am pleasantly surprised that the full article comes off as anti-court-packing - and even suggests most people are.
You are blind as a bat if you think pretty people don’t get life delivered on a silver platter. Oh no people want to have sex with them. At least their social life is squared away and have their pick for a partner.
When someone like this tells me it's my duty as a member of the oppressor race to do something, I become less likely to do it.
One party rule is always a disaster. Without the real threat of getting unelected, a one party hegemony has absolutely no accountability and will invariably seek only its own self-interest. Look at California for an example and the utter nonsense that comes from having a near constant supermajority in both chambers of the legislature.
I call it the dunbar paradox. To grossly sum up a concept that is going to trigger some sperg on this website, "dunbar's number" is like a measure of how accurately meat-brains can process a number. For humans it's like 150~200. Basically whenever things, especially a group of people, get above 200, you lose the ability to accurately gauge how much that is. Your brain can easily tell the difference between 50 and 100, not as much 500 vs 1000. It just becomes a vague "a lot" to you.
"Narcissism of small differences."
At least whitey did something good for the American Indians, I suppose.
Personally, I’m tired of the video. When are we getting 2021’s convention already?
Imagine being this upset over a children's book author believing that you can't change your biological sex.
