Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

He's not entirely incorrect within the "Age of Consent being a feminist construct" thing, because feminists were the spearhead of legislation for it, but it's such a bizarre thing to mention if you're right wing at all. I think it stems from this idea that girls below 18 aren't "riding the cock carousel" and therefore younger girls are the only chance at getting a virgin gf or something, but what do they think will happen if the age of consent stops being a thing? They'll have a better opportunity to get based and redpilled Christian girls who totally aren't whores? No, what will happen is that with the abolition of the age of consent, porn and the broader rampant sexualization of society will affect younger people even more than it already is. If anything, the right wing should be pushing for harder punishments towards it and the punishment of websites and other things that market sexuality towards children. It's well known that the average age kids first find porn is around the 10-12 range, and basically all porn sites target kids to get them hooked and they get by the law with the *nudge nudge wink wink* "You're 18, right? You wouldn't lie to us, right? ;)"
I don't really buy the "Nick is a homosexual" stuff, but I do think the age of consent talk is really suspect, it's such a bizarre hill to die on for anyone unless you have some personal stake in it, just like all the weirdos who vehemently defend lolicon but totally don't jerk it to it.
Just cause femenists came up with it doesnt mean that its a bad thing. Bad ideolgies can have good ideas just not the proper rational behind them. In this case it proably was about protecting young women which is a noble cause.
This whole its different in other countries is also such bs. Yes by the book its differnt but in no other way. In my country the age of consent is 15. But any adult man or woman that sleep with someone that young is disgraced and viewed as a pedo.

The age of constent stuff is just really and issue for fags as they view sexuality differntly then we do.
View attachment 2261241

View attachment 2261244

He is so creepy in this clip. Im gettiner 'error' on my archiver but holy shit is it gross.
Fuentes has got to be a plant by the goverment i cant come up with any other rationalisation for his behaviour. Hes like a caricature of a creepy uncle all thats missing is the mail order thai bride.
So this idea that in western society it was normal to fuck and marry kids is just not true. I dont know where this myth comes from. And this started BEFORE feminism in the 1500s.
In a livestream with baked he said that "he wanted to go back to the 14th century cause thats when it was awesome"
 
Studies of marriage in earlier times indicate that the ordinary run married at ages that might be young now, but not illegal. Early marriages was more a thing with monarchs. Richard II married as his second wife Isabella of Valois when she was six, but there was no question of living with her husband as wife. She was looked after by governess and ladies in waiting, raised as a child, and sometimes visited her husband. The purpose was alliance with France. Given that Richard quite strongly identified with Edward II and tried to get him canonised (his remains were already a place of pilgrimage and reported miracles), probably her virtue would have been utterly safe if Isabel had been older. Earlier King John's lust for his wife Isabella of Angoulême, who was probably 12 when she married him in 1200, was something of black mark against him.

Isabela_richard2.jpg
 
I think Nick is a little weird on the age of consent and equating it with feminism.

Clock me if this has already been said, but a lot of French intellectuals and feminists activists were quite on board with abolishing the age of consent laws.


Simone de Beauvoir signed the French petition against age of consent laws, and she's considered by many to be one of the most seminal figures in feminism. In my mind, she and Judith Butler would probably be the two biggest names in 20th-century feminism.

Of course, there is also a lot of buzz in the LGBTQ world about the age of consent "being weaponized to criminalize homosexuality."
 
He's spreading the idea that its okay to have sex with and marry girls that have fully developed bodies by age 13 because then they're post pubescent. They're fully developed and "not children".
They aren't "fully developed" though. If they do get pregnant, they're vastly more likely to have miscarriages or stillborn babies, require Caesarian sections, or even die. The fact there were child molesters in the past doesn't make it good that we have them now too.
Simone de Beauvoir signed the French petition against age of consent laws, and she's considered by many to be one of the most seminal figures in feminism. In my mind, she and Judith Butler would probably be the two biggest names in 20th-century feminism.
Perverts will say or do anything to justify their perversions, even contradict everything they claim to believe in and literally side with the radical feminists they claim to be opposed to.
Earlier King John's lust for his wife Isabella of Angoulême, who was probably 12 when she married him in 1200, was something of black mark against him.
That would be John Lackland, mainly remembered as a murderer and a shitty king. I forgot he was a pervert, too.
In my country the age of consent is 15. But any adult man or woman that sleep with someone that young is disgraced and viewed as a pedo.
The actual age of consent matters little to any normal person. Countries have it set anywhere from 15 to 18, and society hasn't collapsed. But anyone who is too interested in that issue usually has a reason, and it usually isn't good.
 
Last edited:
He's not entirely incorrect within the "Age of Consent being a feminist construct" thing, because feminists were the spearhead of legislation for it, but it's such a bizarre thing to mention if you're right wing at all. I think it stems from this idea that girls below 18 aren't "riding the cock carousel" and therefore younger girls are the only chance at getting a virgin gf or something, but what do they think will happen if the age of consent stops being a thing? They'll have a better opportunity to get based and redpilled Christian girls who totally aren't whores? No, what will happen is that with the abolition of the age of consent, porn and the broader rampant sexualization of society will affect younger people even more than it already is. If anything, the right wing should be pushing for harder punishments towards it and the punishment of websites and other things that market sexuality towards children. It's well known that the average age kids first find porn is around the 10-12 range, and basically all porn sites target kids to get them hooked and they get by the law with the *nudge nudge wink wink* "You're 18, right? You wouldn't lie to us, right? ;)"
I don't really buy the "Nick is a homosexual" stuff, but I do think the age of consent talk is really suspect, it's such a bizarre hill to die on for anyone unless you have some personal stake in it, just like all the weirdos who vehemently defend lolicon but totally don't jerk it to it.
Yeah, I think these are good points. The age of consent talk is weird because if you're young you can still court a young woman and marry her in a chaste way by the laws of most states; i.e., most states don't prevent teenagers of a certain age from being married with parental consent. My best friend's parents got married when they were both 16. (Whether or not this is wise is another discussion.) Age of consent really comes in more if you're talking about a dating relationship where both parties are unmarried and sleeping together, which seems off-brand for Nick.

I think Nick spends too much time online and it's warped his view of women a lot. I spend a ton of time on the internet, but am from a smaller city, have always interacted with girls who attend church, were homeschooled, etc. My wife was a virgin when we married; I actually was her first kiss. Every one of my male friends who got married were average-looking guys who probably married at least even or above their level, and their wives had not had sex before marriage. It's not nearly as impossible as some people make it out to be. You need to put yourself in social circles where women are still virtuous. The world of right-wing media has people saying the correct stuff, but most of them aren't genuine. I spent some time working in some of those circles and some of those "conservative" women were inappropriate and made me feel uncomfortable at times.

If I were young and on TikTok, Twitter, etc., working in media, I'd definitely believe every woman above the age of 18 (and a lot below) are whores and that's probably were some of this is coming from.
 
Last edited:
Fuentes has got to be a plant by the goverment i cant come up with any other rationalisation for his behaviour. Hes like a caricature of a creepy uncle all thats missing is the mail order thai bride.

In a livestream with baked he said that "he wanted to go back to the 14th century cause thats when it was awesome"
My take is that Fedentes knows that he will get a curtain call at some point and is trying to bank whatever he can in terms of tradable information to shave time off his punishments.

Personally, I think he is actually a perverted freak who likes men and possibly young girls; this is just him being the degenerate faggot that he is. With that said, at this point, I suspect that he appreciates that his purpose always has been to be a new kind of Richard Spencer to embarrass and humiliate genuine RW Whites. And, he's hamming up the role.

Let's think about this for just half a moment. The 110lb Judeo-Mexican boy leader of the White race was slavishly dedicated to optics: "Don't be like those bad optics wignat trash. They will turn off normal people!" Meanwhile, he lusted over some who named Paultown, a bisexual bodybuilder, and an Australian degenerate homosexual who sucked on horse dildos.

Now, Fedentes has gone to the level of saying that it's cool to have cocaine fueled orgies and pass around 17 year olds... and we need to abolish AoC! Superior optics, indeed. Nothing will get the normies on your side to chat with coworkers like saying child molester physiognomy case studies should be able to defile "developed" 13 year olds.

Let's keep in mind that the entire, and I mean ENTIRE, circle of associates are demented freaks who either harass women or tried to prey on them. I know personally one woman who Beardson and his crew went after. Malkik "Smooth" Sanchez constantly harassed White women. Baked Alaska used a psychologically damaged woman (women if you include Ashton Birdie.) Chaggot's saga has been well covered.

I think one episode in this whole thing is the Prince Hubris (Shawn Deats?) character who admitted that he was cruising Catholic chapels to try to find a mid teens girl. These people are the definition of predators and in another context would be on the candid camera being asked to take a seat by Chris Hansen.

While it is probably hoping for too much, my best case scenario is, as I mentioned some time ago, for lower level FBI guys to push hard on the grooming/pedophilia/CP angles of the investigation. Frankly, this collective of sickos should not be walking free, pushing their luck further and further. What I think probably will happen is there will be a selective inclusion of some of the grooming stuff; just enough to tar Rightists generally with perverted garbage, but not enough to totally take down this Mercer backed hive of scum.
 
Last edited:
My take is that Fedentes knows that he will get a curtain call at some point and is trying to bank whatever he can in terms of tradable information to shave time off his punishments.

Personally, I think he is actually a perverted freak who likes men and possibly young girls; this is just him being the degenerate faggot that he is. With that said, at this point, I suspect that he appreciates that his purpose always has been to be a new kind of Richard Spencer to embarrass and humiliated genuine RW Whites. And, he's hamming up the role.

Let's think about this for just half a moment. The 110lb Judeo-Mexican boy leader of the White race was slavishly dedicated to optics: "Don't be like those bad optics wignat trash. They will turn off normal people!" Meanwhile, he lusted over some who named Paultown, a bisexual bodybuilder, and an Australian degenerate homosexual who sucked on horse dildos.

Now, Fedentes has gone to the level of saying that it's cool to have cocaine fueled orgies and pass around 17 year olds... and we need to abolish AoC! Superior optics, indeed. Nothing will get the normies on your side to chat will coworkers like saying child molester physiognomy case studies should be able to defile "developed" 13 year olds.

Let's keep in mind that the entire, and I mean ENTIRE, circle of associates of Fedentes are demented freaks who either harass women who tried to prey on them. I know personally one woman who Beardson and his crew went after. Malkik "Smooth" Sanchez constantly harassed White women. Baked Alaska used a psychologically damaged woman (women if you include Ashton Birdie.) Chaggot's saga has been well covered.

I think one stream in this whole thing is the Prince Hubris (Shawn Deats?) character who admitted that he was cruising Catholic chapels to try to find a mid teens girl. These people are the definition of predators and in another context would be on the candid camera being asked to take a seat by Chris Hansen.

While it is probably hoping for too much, my best case scenario is, as I mentioned some time ago, for lower level FBI guys to push hard on the grooming/pedophilia/CP angles of the investigation. Frankly, this collective of sickos should not be walking free, pushing their luck further and further. What I think probably will happen is there will be a selective inclusion of some of the grooming stuff; just enough to tar Rightists generally with perverted garbage, but not enough to totally take down this Mercer backed hive of scum.
I think the glowniggers plan a large scandal using Fuentes as the key to frame actual figures that are taken seriously in not only white nationalist but also even boomercon circles.
The reason this operation is taking so long is simply because anyone that takes their far-right/moderate right ideology seriously or isn't a deranged troon who A-logs thinking it will help in tarnishing the image of rightism knows that Fuentes is a fed or at the very least a grifter.
Glowniggers are not omnipotent, so the diversity hires will keep beating the same hammer like a groid beating his son for eating his Jordans, regardless of results.
I'm pretty sure even Charlie Kirk and TPUSA know the glowing nature of America First.
 
Yeah, I think these are good points. The age of consent talk is weird because if you're young you can still court a young woman and marry her in a chaste way by the laws of most states; i.e., most states don't prevent teenagers of a certain age from being married with parental consent. My best friend's parents got married when they were both 16. (Whether or not this is wise is another discussion.) Age of consent really comes in more if you're talking about a dating relationship where both parties are unmarried and sleeping together, which seems off-brand for Nick.

I think Nick spends too much time online and it's warped his view of women a lot. I spend a ton of time on the internet, but am from a smaller city, have always interacted with girls who attend church, were homeschooled, etc. My wife was a virgin when we married; I actually was her first kiss. Every one of my male friends who got married were average-looking guys who probably married at least even or above their level, and their wives had not had sex before marriage. It's not nearly as impossible as some people make it out to be. You need to put yourself in social circles where women are still virtuous. The world of right-wing media has people saying the correct stuff, but most of them aren't genuine. I spent some time working in some of those circles and some of those "conservative" women were inappropriate and made me feel uncomfortable at times.

If I were young and on TikTok, Twitter, etc., working in media, I'd definitely believe every woman above the age of 18 (and a lot below) are whores and that's probably were some of this is coming from.
This

If you look for women in vice ridden positions, then you'll only find vice ridden women

If you look for women in virtuous positions then you'll find virtuous women
 
I think the glowniggers plan a large scandal using Fuentes as the key to frame actual figures that are taken seriously in not only white nationalist but also even boomercon circles.
The reason this operation is taking so long is simply because anyone that takes their far-right/moderate right ideology seriously or isn't a deranged troon who A-logs thinking it will help in tarnishing the image of rightism knows that Fuentes is a fed or at the very least a grifter.
Glowniggers are not omnipotent, so the diversity hires will keep beating the same hammer like a groid beating his son for eating his Jordans, regardless of results.
I'm pretty sure even Charlie Kirk and TPUSA know the glowing nature of America First.
Really good take. I was talking to someone a few weeks ago about how Nickelodeon is almost a fixture now at InfoWars and how if he is branded a groomer, etc., it would tarnish anyone who gave a platform to this guy.

Now, for years people in RW circles have told me that Alex Jones was perhaps the most prolific FBI informant (which is my position.) In fact, Alex Jones admitted in the second hour of his show on the Monday or Tuesday after the Jan 6 honeypot that "of course I talk to the FBI. They come to me for intel.... The good ones." I can try to find the exact clip and timestamp it, but the way I and others took it was he was doing some pre-emptive damage control in the event it comes out that he has been turning people in for decades (and that is why he has been allowed to make tens of millions of dollars in profit.)

But, why would he host a punk who is about to go down for being a Jan 6er AND and pervert? Maybe something in my assessment is wrong. Or, maybe, Jones also knows that his time is almost up and he will have to spin off Infowars to something like TheBlaze while he "goes back to home broadcasting because the message is too explosive for a fixed office" or some similar nonsense.

Meanwhile, by this point he has humiliated the Right not just once with his approach to Sandy Hook but again by giving a platform to an extraordinarily toxic personality. Since Alex Jones reaches or at least influences millions, maybe this is a step to the intentional humiliation of, as you say, BoomerCon and moderately RW types. It's worth noting that it appears Jones' lawyer sidekick Barnes seems to anticipate this given how direct and thorough his rejection of Fed has been (meanwhile, Alt Lite types and PJW praise Nickers as a "Rosa Parks of our generation." (To be clear I am NOT agreeing with Barnes and his neocon take on Israel.)

I haven't seen what David Knight has been up to since January. He probably would consider the Afro-Latino Campus Conservative exactly as you say, Nynch, a circus performer intended to grab attention and infect those around him. And maybe because no one is taking the bait (rather they needed to astroturf him as mentioned), the planned op is stalled. On the other hand, my working theory last month was that the higher level types are going to time things for the maximum humiliation effect and to get more mileage from the braindead masses (e.g., oh we just have to suspend normal law for Right Wingers because that Nick Fuentes is so unbelievably....)

Then again, there is always the possibility that the 400+ randos picked up and thrown into DC torture pits has been enough for this go. I don't think this is the case because I think they want more legislative pretenses for locking down finances, especially through crypto wallets. The story about NF getting the $600,000 supposedly from a Frenchman who committed suicide seems like too juicy an opportunity to leave on the table.
 
Inside the Blue and Red lines, and note this is before feminism, starting around the 1500s the west of the red line, the average age of marriage was 23 or older for women and 26 or older for men.
that's very interesting because we constantly hear that in medieval times if you lived to 30 you were considered an elder. these are the lies the enlightenment tells you. from all sources on the medieval times people regularly lived to 70
 
that's very interesting because we constantly hear that in medieval times if you lived to 30 you were considered an elder. these are the lies the enlightenment tells you. from all sources on the medieval times people regularly lived to 70
The average was dragged way down by newborn deaths, plagues, and the like. If you lived to adulthood, were lucky enough to avoid the common disasters of the time, and were reasonably wealthy, you'd stand a good chance of living to an old age.
 
Nick is such a disgrace. I didn't want to derail the thread any further last time Nick's AoC stance was brought up, but I guess he won't shut up about it so it's topical again.
TPTB want to go after your kids. Nick HAS to know this. We are only a few years away from conservatives showing off their pet "Non offending paedophile" to own the libs like they're doing with Bruce Jenner now.
On the friend-enemy distinction, kid diddlers are one of the BIGGEST enemies that the average, productive person has. As a dissident figure, regardless of personal beliefs, Nick should be advocating the opposite. This really just spells it out that Nick lost his head after groyper wars and is little more than a pawn to be used by whoever's in charge. I don't think he's an active agent like some people in the thread, but it doesn't even matter at this point.
 
The age of consent is such a useless thing to argue with as a conservative. There are so many things to try and push back on, like no fault divorce, child custody imbalance, etc. Anytime I see someone, left or right circle, start to fixate on age of consent then something is up. Optics King should focus on divorce laws and finding virtuous WOMEN, not impressionable children.
 
The average was dragged way down by newborn deaths, plagues, and the like. If you lived to adulthood, were lucky enough to avoid the common disasters of the time, and were reasonably wealthy, you'd stand a good chance of living to an old age.
This

If you lived to the age of 5 or maybe 10, your life expectancy jumps up past 60. The average was 30 because that many died before 5. Not uncommon for a woman to have 7 kids and 3-4 survive. We just didnt know what we know now when it comes to healthcare.
 
1623739456963.png

Spotted at the first Annual Men's March for Life on June 12th.

Page 4 is the bulletin insert for this
The first ever National Men's March to defend the least of these and call for the endo f [sic] the government sanctioned daily mass murder of abortion. T

This march required Professional dress code: Wear a suit. Priests in clerics

NO signs. We will have one banner to express our clear, unified message:

Let's Stop Murdering our Preborn Children... This Men's March is the first step toward a National Men's Movement to End Abortion that will strive to compliment and unite the many men's groups already are [sic] assembled and doing good things.

LET YOUR FAITH
BE GRATER THAN YOUR FEAR

Here's the post event promo Here's the actual event

300 men showed up all wearing suits, Sargon would be proud. So much for a single unified message there boys. We can't get a good turn out or frame our photo's correctly spell or use proper grammar in our promos and no one covered this and we didn't even bother to come up with a hashtag so we never had a chance to be a #movement. But we have the best optics.

So AF is still trying to grift onto the pro-life catholic grift. At least that blue suit looks fly as fuck that straw hat and grey suit not doing it for me.
 
Last edited:
Spotted at the first Annual Men's March for Life on June 12th.

...

300 men showed up all wearing suits, Sargon would be proud. So much for a single unified message there boys. We can't get a good turn out or frame our photo's correctly spell or use proper grammar in our promos and no one covered this and we didn't even bother to come up with a hashtag so we never had a chance to be a #movement. But we have the best optics.

So AF is still trying to grift onto the pro-life catholic grift. At least that blue suit looks fly as fuck that straw hat and grey suit not doing it for me.

One of the greatest currents in traditional Catholic and conservative Catholic circles over the past ~5 years (and especially the past 2) has been the active subversion by GOP and quasi counter new world order groups.

Traditional Catholicism generally speaking prior to the 2010s was pretty firmly contra-ZOG (cf Plot Against the Church by "Maurice Pinay" for example.) The general current of the laity, whether it was FSSP, ICKSP, SSPX, or even dedicated diocesan parishes, was that neo-liberalism is fundamentally wrong and the Tribe has incredible control over things.

Given that the SPLC and ADL have consistently registered "Traditional Catholicism" as the largest anti-Semitic hate group in the USA, there should be no surprise that some chose to try to subvert rather than directly engage.

Enter various grifter types who were backed by Opus Dei and have gone on to become near cult leaders for their online audiences. In the meanwhile, traditional Catholic media sources have significantly toned down discussion on controversial subjects like the tug of war between the Church and Jewish power. Instead, in some cases, these outlets have become almost absurd mouthpieces for Bannon/Trump/Mercer propaganda.

There is a clear tidal pull, which sadly is working, to draw people from a more authentic approach to what we believe is the greatest crisis in the Church since the Arian Heresy, and towards a sort of neo-neoconservative Catholicism. With a bit more incense, Latin, and nicer vestments, laity are led to become kind of fiefdom of the GOP and false opposition (like Trump and DeSantis.) Fr Altman is a good example of this: probably well meaning, but has gone to a wild degree of pro-GOP preaching instead of recognizing the bankruptcy of all electoral politics.

But where does Fuentes factor into this?

It is undeniable that there was some kind of concerted effort to rebrand odious grifters as "traditional Catholics." Fedentes did this most aggressively, but Sammy Davis Jr's twin Ali Akbar (whose stage name is "Ali Alexander), a known homosexual, temporarily rebranded as a traditional Catholic convert. "Prince Hubris" of course did this routine. Baked Alaska has done the same, although his is the most laughable as he has admitted it is just something he said as an act.

But why? In my view, the funding and direction provided by Opus Dei to create online parallel bishops in Taylor Marshall and Michael Voris is a similar initiative to the creation of a cadre of Zoomer freaks pretending to be Catholic. The particular goals differ however.

In the former case, they want to draw people away from recognizing that authentic Catholicism and Talmudic Judaism are completely opposed and to be a sincere Catholic means to reject the world, which is utterly dominated by this Judeo order and collaborators. Marshall will rant about Freemasons all day (90% of which are just White guys in the South having a social club and aren't even needed as a buffer by the powers that be any more), never mentioning that Freemasonry was basically Kabbalah set up in post-Crowmellian England. Indeed he will decry "anti-Semitism" and promote Holocaust idolatry.

In the latter situation (Nickers et al), I believe the goal is humiliation. Skinny fat 19 year old punks waving around our symbols while they do buttstuff and groom youngsters, all while they do not attend Mass nor know anything about basic Catholic belief/history/practice.

I know that this sounds tin foil tier, but it is not deniable that Opus Dei has provided funding for the people I mentioned (and is known to promote a sort of Judaized neoconservative faux Catholicism.) It is also not deniable that Mercer-backed Milo has been cultivating a traditional Catholic persona for years. For perhaps less than a million dollars, some of Trump's original Jewish billionaire backers would get a lot of return on investment if their pets humiliated the bulk of trad Catholics by tarring us with NF's garbage activities.

Guy in the pic with the blue AF cap looks suspiciously familiar to horrendous optics purple polo guy stood next to Nick at a stop the steal protest in DC where this pro life march took place. Same weak bone structure and absent jawline. Also a penchant for purple. Can any autists confirm?
View attachment 2263558
Looks like the same chinless trust fund weak 'Groyper' to me. Good catch, Biggie.
 
Back