Preston Poulter et al v. Ali "Dean" Assaf et al (2021)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
It's been a couple of days since the last update to the case and I just thought of something:
Is there a filing time limit?
If so, how close are we to the deadline?
Click to expand...

It would depend on the court in question.

Could they be looking to let the clock run out and refile?
 
The defendants may not have even been served yet, and if they have, they can propose extending their deadline to respond.
 
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
It's been a couple of days since the last update to the case and I just thought of something:
Is there a filing time limit?
If so, how close are we to the deadline?
Click to expand...

This is my guess at a timeline based on other past stuff in the Federal 5th Circuit. And this is just a guess. I'm no expert.

The next event should be for Poulter to request a summons on the defendants.
Then around roughly a week later, the defendants will have been served and summons comes back executed to the court
The defendants might be given about three weeks from the time they were served to respond.
If they filed a motion for a two or three week extension for the initial response, it would usually be granted without opposition.

So we are possibly about eight weeks out from the responses being made to the complaint. But there
could be slowdowns to the process due to COVID.

I'm somewhat surprised that the summons have not been requested from the court yet. I'm not sure what the deadline
would be for that. Its usually sort of an automatic thing at the start and I don't know why anyone would delay doing it.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Autistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Elwood P. Dowd, VIkkiVerse and jspit2.0
Strix454 said:
I'm somewhat surprised that the summons have not been requested from the court yet.
Click to expand...
Filed May 24th for all three defendants.

1623887908300.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Smug Freiza, jspit2.0 and 2 others
My bad. So I would guess they were served maybe within a week of the summons and they have three weeks to respond.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: jspit2.0
I'm not a Robot said:
Filed May 24th for all three defendants.

View attachment 2268355
Click to expand...
It's an invalid summons to begin with. His name isn't Dean Assaf, which they fixed in their amended complaint, so I believe a new one will have to go out for him. To my knowledge, Vikki hasn't been served at all. In fact I don't believe anyone has been served at all, let alone properly. Since there's no proof of service on the docket at the moment then that supports my assertion on the matter. They're also looking to bring Randall Hegg, a/k/a @TESTEFY-HD into the lawsuit. His address and dox were apparently posted to Preston's Discord.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Elwood P. Dowd and Smug Freiza
Spectre_06 said:
It's an invalid summons to begin with. His name isn't Dean Assaf, which they fixed in their amended complaint, so I believe a new one will have to go out for him. To my knowledge, Vikki hasn't been served at all. In fact I don't believe anyone has been served at all, let alone properly. Since there's no proof of service on the docket at the moment then that supports my assertion on the matter. They're also looking to bring Randall Hegg, a/k/a @TESTEFY-HD into the lawsuit. His address and dox were apparently posted to Preston's Discord.
Click to expand...

DA Talks put up a whole lot more information in a video which will helpfully tie the name in the dox to "testefy" for Preston. All these people are more concerned with their dumb youtube feuds and personal drama than legally defending themselves.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Strix454 said:
DA Talks put up a whole lot more information in a video which will helpfully tie the name in the dox to "testefy" for Preston. All these people are more concerned with their dumb youtube feuds and personal drama than legally defending themselves.
Click to expand...
They voluntarily doxed a co-defendant at the request of the man suing them for likes? Ethan should send them thirty pieces of silver ribbitcoin.

1623896350200.png


 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Yuusha-sama and Strix454
I'm not a Robot said:
They voluntarily doxed a co-defendant at the request of the man suing them for likes? Ethan should send them thirty pieces of silver ribbitcoin.

View attachment 2268692
View attachment 2268690
Click to expand...
He's not a codefendant, and he's probably the one that--if he's dragged in--no one will want to deal with at all. Ethan is not a fan of Testefy because the little cancer loves to fucking cause shit and spread rumors for attention. He was literally trying to drive a wedge between Dean and Vikki, even saying multiple times he had "evidence" that everything Preston accused them of was true--only to then turn around when told to produce said evidence and admit he had nothing more than "they joined my server". He was also saying he hopes Preston takes Vikki--and later Dean--for every penny they have. Honest opinion, with Testefy literally calling Preston and John Lamont pedophiles and child predators they have a much stronger case against him than the others.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Elwood P. Dowd, Smug Freiza and 1 other person
As of right now, @TESTEFY-HD has not officially joined this lawsuit.
As such, he isn't relevant to it (that could change, though).
We don't even know if the listed defendants have been properly served.
... Speaking of which, any chances of seeing a Melinda Scott scenario where the case is dismissed because of improper service?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Smug Freiza
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
As of right now, @TESTEFY-HD has not officially joined this lawsuit.
As such, he isn't relevant to it (that could change, though).
We don't even know if the listed defendants have been properly served.
... Speaking of which, any chances of seeing a Melinda Scott scenario where the case is dismissed because of improper service?
Click to expand...
The case wasn't dismissed because of improper service, the default judgment that was entered for Melinda was vacated because of the improper service. That being said, I do not see this case proceeding beyond the motion to dismiss for either failure to state a claim, or lack of jurisdiction on the part of the court.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant and Captain Manning
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Captain Manning, Botchy Galoop, The Coon and 2 others
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
Well, then.
Let's see if they can get another attorney (or attorneys) that will take up their case. If not, the only time and money that was wasted were their own.
Click to expand...
They'll have to hire a real lawyer because even if Preston thought he could use his pro se experience, he can't with John attached to the lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, The Coon, Mister Dongs and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back